Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝐘𝐨𝐮 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐌𝐞

Channel

𝐘𝐨𝐮 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐌𝐞

@you_andm1i

Not marked by Telegram, checked 12 August 2026

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

4,481subscribers

-39 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002243469383
TypeChannel
Username@you_andm1i
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/you_andm1i

Growth

4,4814,5204,500.57 August 2026 — 4,520 subscribers7 August 2026 — 4,520 subscribers11 August 2026 — 4,502 subscribers14 August 2026 — 4,488 subscribers17 August 2026 — 4,481 subscribers7 August 202617 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 10 days, net -39. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,475–4,526 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 20:574,481-7
14 Aug 2026, 16:054,488-14
11 Aug 2026, 14:214,502-18
7 Aug 2026, 14:174,520no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:034,520first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
14.3%
avg views ÷ 4,481 subscribers
Avg views / post
641
21 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
21
of 21 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held21 (4 August 20268 August 2026)
Views total13,471
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 18:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 09:24 UTC571 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Цитаты — не магия, а инструмент: начни с одной фразы в день, отражай её в жизни и записывай мысли. Какая цитата тебя вдохновляет сейчас? 😊

8 Aug 2026, 07:49 UTC563 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Позитив — не про розовые очки, а про зеркало: ловишь плохую мысль, говоришь ей правду и выбираешь полезную замену. Попробуй сегодня — заметишь разницу. 😊

8 Aug 2026, 05:59 UTC555 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Наблюдай за пингвинами: учись сотрудничать. 1) Делегируй простые задачи. 2) Собирайтесь на короткие совместные действия. 3) Хвалите друг друга за маленькие успехи. 🐧

8 Aug 2026, 03:09 UTC572 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

8 из 10 привычек не приживаются без простого плана. Начни с одной маленькой привычки, закрепи неделю, добавь ещё — так менять жизнь реально и без стресса. ✨

7 Aug 2026, 09:24 UTC697 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Частая ошибка — искать мотивацию в чужих словах, а не в своих ценностях. Найди одну честную цель, возвращайся к ней ежедневно. Маленький шаг — всё меняет. 😊

7 Aug 2026, 07:52 UTC665 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Бетховен писал «Оду к радости», уже почти глухой — музыка стала актом веры в жизнь. Когда ты творишь вопреки, возможное расширяется. Попробуй сегодня. 🎵

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @you_andm1i. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 546,222 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Nasheeds | Quran
@nashidy_s · 88,499
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 34 here — alongside 33 others — read 17 August 2026
Nasheeds| Нашиды | Quran
@nasheedrs · 108,190
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 14 August 2026
ЭХО ДАГЕСТАНА | Махачкала Дербент Хасавюрт Каспийск Буйнакск Избербаш Кизляр
@ekho_dagestana1 · 210,998
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 11 August 2026
Мой Дербент
@derbentmoy · 106,533
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 15 August 2026
ТУТ ДАГЕСТАН 🦅 | МАХАЧКАЛА КАСПИЙСК ХАСАВЮРТ ДЕРБЕНТ
@tutdagesttan · 118,276
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 14 August 2026
арабские цитаты
@islamskietsitaty · 109,817
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 14 August 2026
ЧП Дагестан
@chp_05 · 90,575
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 17 August 2026

This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝐘𝐨𝐮 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐌𝐞” (@you_andm1i), 4,481 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/you_andm1i.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.