Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Ёлки-палки

Channel

Ёлки-палки

@yollgarden

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,987subscribers

-23 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002062534967
TypeChannel
Username@yollgarden
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/yollgarden

Growth

6,9867,0106,9987 August 2026 — 7,010 subscribers8 August 2026 — 7,010 subscribers11 August 2026 — 7,007 subscribers14 August 2026 — 7,002 subscribers17 August 2026 — 6,996 subscribers20 August 2026 — 6,991 subscribers23 August 2026 — 6,996 subscribers26 August 2026 — 6,990 subscribers30 August 2026 — 6,986 subscribers2 September 2026 — 6,991 subscribers7 September 2026 — 6,987 subscribers6,9877 August 20267 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 31 days, net -23. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,982–7,014 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Sept 2026, 14:216,987-4
2 Sept 2026, 14:356,991+5
30 Aug 2026, 04:126,986-4
26 Aug 2026, 17:546,990-6
23 Aug 2026, 16:266,996+5
20 Aug 2026, 06:246,991-5
17 Aug 2026, 15:166,996-6
14 Aug 2026, 02:367,002-5
11 Aug 2026, 01:137,007-3
8 Aug 2026, 08:077,010no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:037,010first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
21.6%
avg views ÷ 6,987 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,510
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
18.2%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 13 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 August 2026
Posts held13 (31 July 202619 August 2026)
Views total9,060
Reactions total1,645
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken20 Aug 2026, 02:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

3,995 reactions across 13 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1,55138.8%
1,29332.4%
🔥78219.6%
🥰1042.60%
❤‍🔥962.40%
🤔721.80%
😍170.426%
🏆120.3%
👏120.3%
🎉110.275%
🤩110.275%
90.225%
💊70.175%
😱60.15%
🤣50.125%
🕊30.075%
💯20.05%
🤷20.05%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,995 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 19 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 13 we hold a reading for · 8%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @yollgarden. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 13 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 19 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

19 Aug 2026, 18:41 UTC430 views115 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Forwarded from @nika_zubraPhoto

Обзор цветения метельчатых гортензий на первой стадии окрашивания. Всё вокруг запушистилось! Статья в Дзене с картинками https://dzen.ru/a/aoX1ut3Fk1Owg2Kt Видео в Рутубе https://rutube.ru/video/c4a06fd5aef4d7c15bdd3001090d3612/ Видео в Дзен Премиум https://dzen.ru/video/watch/6a85e88ab46f3f18cee62cad

👍6736🤣4🥰4🔥3🏆1

Signed Nika Zubra

19 Aug 2026, 13:42 UTC≈1,080 views201 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

В Гагаринском Сфетофоре свеженькие китайские фаленопсисы по 750р. Не мороженные, не пересушенные, пока не залитые, все замечательные.

👍153🥰2319🔥4💊2

Signed Nika Zubra

17 Aug 2026, 09:14 UTC≈1,540 views366 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Инжир поспевает 😊

🔥225👍8636🎉9🥰5🤩3🤣1😍1

Signed Nika Zubra

16 Aug 2026, 18:01 UTC≈1,710 views327 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Всё, высадила групнолистные гортензии в грядочку. На зиму укрою, дальше их проблемы. Саму грядку надо обложить брёвнами или кирпичами. Но кирпичи древней исчезнувшей цивилизации сейчас дефицит.

👍22469🔥25🥰6💊2🤔1

Signed Nika Zubra

10 Aug 2026, 16:10 UTC≈2,900 views339 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

"Синий" ринхостилис распустился! Да, у садовников это считается синим. И на фотках продавца был совсем другой оттенок ночного синего неба. А так это фиолетовый довольно редкий ринхостилис с редким цветом.

👍205❤‍🔥5043🔥28😍72👏2🥰2

Signed Nika Zubra

10 Aug 2026, 09:35 UTC≈1,400 views297 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Forwarded from @nika_zubraPhoto

Очень удачная получилась композиция в этом островочке на мой вкус. Гортензия метельчатая Пинк&Роуз, гелениум какой-то, пара барбарисов Тунберга разного размера, на заднем плане листва огромной куртины сибирского ириса, голубая безымянная ёлка, за ёлкой там ещё гортензия Полярный Медведь. На переднем плане Дербенник иволистный с ближайшего болотца, уже почти отцвёл.

175👍80❤‍🔥17🔥12🥰5🏆4🤩3🎉1

Signed Nika Zubra

8 Aug 2026, 19:59 UTC≈1,640 views280 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Редкое и сложное. Зацвели два микро цимбидиума. Но с первым какая-то проблема: цветы только распустились и сразу начали гнить кончики лепестков.

163🤔71👍30🥰10🕊31👏1🤷1

Signed Nika Zubra

8 Aug 2026, 08:20 UTC≈1,500 views286 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Два горшочка с европейскими цикламенами упихала в древние советские кашпо, обложив мхом. Им там хорошо и симпатично!

169👍86❤‍🔥20🏆5🥰5🔥1

Signed Nika Zubra

7 Aug 2026, 10:52 UTC≈1,640 views444 reactions1 Starread 10 August 2026
Photo

Шикарная метельчатая гортензия Ванилла Фрайз у тёти Тамары. В этом году Ванилле очень тяжело под дождями и ветрами.

👍211🔥11879🥰21😍7😱61🤷1

Signed Nika Zubra

7 Aug 2026, 04:30 UTC≈1,470 views331 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Огромные лилии распустились. Слизнячкам на радость ☺️

199👍67🔥50🥰7🤩42💯2

Signed Nika Zubra

3 Aug 2026, 05:30 UTC≈2,780 views333 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Лимон Пандероза старается, растит два лимона сразу

👍199🔥7239🥰12👏6💊3😍2

Signed Nika Zubra

1 Aug 2026, 05:38 UTC≈2,700 views367 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Урожай спеет! На самом деле, лимоны уже можно снимать, они готовы ко всему. Но хочется дождаться пожелтевания.

197👍102🔥50❤‍🔥83👏3🥰3🎉1

Signed Nika Zubra

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @yollgarden. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Дина, Коллекция Рецептов
@dinarecipes · 36,315
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 1 September 2026
Псовский диктор🎙️
@psovsky_dicktor · 70,266
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 20 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ёлки-палки” (@yollgarden), 6,987 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yollgarden.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.