برای اطلاعات بیشتر کافیه عدد 151 رو به پشتیبانی ارسال کنید: @yogapendarsupport
❤8

Channel
@yogapendarchannel
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
11,550subscribers
-23 since we began measuring on 21 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001886307632 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @yogapendarchannel |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 21 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/yogapendarchannel |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Sept 2026, 10:39 | 11,550 | -14 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 05:19 | 11,564 | -9 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 10:49 | 11,573 | -3 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 03:43 | 11,576 | +2 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 04:34 | 11,574 | -3 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 02:48 | 11,577 | -1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 23:36 | 11,578 | +1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 00:04 | 11,577 | +1 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 23:41 | 11,576 | +10 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 00:43 | 11,566 | -4 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 12:05 | 11,570 | -1 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 21:17 | 11,571 | -2 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 16:30 | 11,573 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 2 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (2 April 2026 – 17 August 2026) |
| Views total | 10,110 |
| Reactions total | 52 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 01:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,938 reactions across 18 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1,293 | 66.7% | |
| 🙏 | 237 | 12.2% | |
| 👍 | 113 | 5.83% | |
| 😢 | 81 | 4.18% | |
| 🕊 | 57 | 2.94% | |
| 👏 | 47 | 2.43% | |
| 🔥 | 25 | 1.29% | |
| 👌 | 21 | 1.08% | |
| 🏆 | 14 | 0.722% | |
| 😭 | 13 | 0.671% | |
| 🤔 | 10 | 0.516% | |
| ❤🔥 | 8 | 0.413% | |
| 😍 | 7 | 0.361% | |
| 🥰 | 7 | 0.361% | |
| 👀 | 2 | 0.103% | |
| 🍾 | 1 | 0.052% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.052% | |
| 🤷♀ | 1 | 0.052% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,938 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 2 April 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
برای اطلاعات بیشتر کافیه عدد 151 رو به پشتیبانی ارسال کنید: @yogapendarsupport
❤8
دوستان مربی یوگا که منتظر این دوره بینظیر بودن، هفته دیگه کلاس شروع میشه 🧘♀️✨ این دوره برای همه مربیهای یوگا واجبه 🙏🔥
❤17
File, posted without a caption
❤11
پاسخ هوشمند: 🧠 دوره آناتومی و کینزیولوژی یوگا و بدن هوشمند با رویکرد علمی، فاشیایی، نوروماسکولار و فانکشنال بدن فقط عضله نیست… بدن شبکهای از فاشیا، اعصاب، تنفس، الگوهای حرکتی و ارتباطات عصبیـعضلانی است. در این دوره یاد میگیریم: ✔️ تحلیل علمی آساناها ✔️ آناتومی عضلات و مفاصل و لیگامانها ✔️ درک زنجیرههای حرکتی و عملکردی بدن ✔️ نقش فاشیا و سیستم عصبی در حرکت ✔️ اصلاح اجرای حرکات یوگا در جهت کاهش احتمال آسیب ✔️ ن…
❤14🏆1👍1
آیا هر چیزی که در MRI دیده میشود، دقیقاً همان چیزی است که درد را ایجاد کرده؟ 🧠 بررسیهای علمی نشان دادهاند که بعضی تغییرات ساختاری، مانند تغییرات دیسک و مفاصل، ممکن است در افرادی که درد یا محدودیت مشخصی ندارند هم دیده شوند. این موضوع به معنای کماهمیتبودن MRI نیست. MRI یکی از ابزارهای ارزشمند بررسی بدن است؛ اما نتیجه آن بهتر است در کنار این موارد تفسیر شود: شرح حال فرد محل و الگوی علائم معاینه حرکتی و عصبی عمل…
❤80🙏41👍15👏12🔥2
🌿 REN4؛ یکی از مهمترین فرانتمو پوینتهای بدن این نقطه در طب سوزنی برای تقویت انرژی و کلیه، کمک به تنظیم متابولیسم و روند کاهش وزن، و همچنین حمایت از عملکرد روده و کاهش برخی التهابهای گوارشی کاربرد دارد. 🎥 در این ویدیو با کاربردهای مهم REN4 و روش صحیح پیدا کردن آن آشنا میشوید. حتماً ویدیو را تا انتها ببینید.
❤181🙏57👏6🔥6🥰5👀2
بسیاری از ما فکر میکنیم چون در سکوت نشستهایم و مراقبه میکنیم، پس خودآگاهی بیشتری پیدا کردهایم. اما گاهی آنچه تجربه میکنیم «خودآگاهی» نیست، بلکه «داستانی زیبا برای توجیه خودمان» است. تا وقتی جرئت دیدن ترسها، خشمها، حسادتها، ضعفها و الگوهای تکراری خود را نداشته باشیم، سکوت هم میتواند به پناهگاهی برای فرار از حقیقت تبدیل شود. آگاهی واقعی فقط آرامش نیست؛ صداقت با خود است. شاید مهمترین سؤال این باشد: آیا مراقبه…
❤173👍72👏15🙏15🤔10🏆3🤷♀1
۱۱ - ذهن پنهان نیست، ذهن همان نقاب است (بخش پایانی) لینک کانال خلاصه کتاب
❤33🙏18🔥2
خوش است خلوت اگر یار یارِ من باشد نه من بسوزم و او شمعِ انجمن باشد من آن نگینِ سلیمان به هیچ نَسْتانَم که گاه گاه بر او دستِ اهرمن باشد روا مدار خدایا که در حریمِ وصال رقیب محرم و حِرمان نصیبِ من باشد غزلی از حضرت حافظ این صدا : بهروز رضوی @razavi_behrooz @Hamidjafarinezhad1356 کانال رسمی بهروز رضوی 👇👇👇👇👇 https://t.me/razavi_behrooz صفحه رسمی اینستاگرام بهروز رضوی 👇👇👇👇👇 @razavi_behrooz #بهروز_رضوی_نیا #…
❤97😢30🕊16❤🔥8👍4🙏2👏1🥰1
بزرگ مرد دنیای هنر و مرد جاودانه صدای ایران، انسانی که معنای بزرگی و شرافت بود، دار فانی را وداع گفت، بهروز رضوی عزیز، روحت شاد باشه🖤🖤
❤105😢49🕊40🙏16😭13🔥6
🌬️ شاید عجیب به نظر برسد، اما گاهی ریشه کمردرد، گردندرد یا حتی دردهای شانه، جایی نیست که درد را احساس میکنیم... دیافراگم فقط عضله تنفس نیست. ❤️ این عضله با فاشیا، ستون فقرات، دندهها، عضلات مرکزی بدن، سیستم لنفاوی و حتی سیستم عصبی ارتباط عمیقی دارد. وقتی دیافراگم خوب حرکت نکند، تنفس کمعمقتر میشود، بدن راحتتر وارد حالت استرس و تنش میشود و ممکن است الگوهای حرکتی بدن هم بهتدریج تغییر کنند. نتیجه؟ 😕 گاهی کمرد…
❤232🙏37👏13👍7🏆6🔥6👌4🕊1
شروع دوره از سه شنبه ۵ خرداد عدد ۱۵۰ رو به پشتیبانی یوگاپندار در تلگرام ارسال کنید @yogapendarsupport
❤27🏆4🙏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @yogapendarchannel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Yogapendar” (@yogapendarchannel), 11,550 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yogapendarchannel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.