Channel
@ymlnvchannel
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
2,156subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001132734734 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ymlnvchannel |
| Created | Between 1 June 2017 and 31 August 2020— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ymlnvchannel |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 20:32 | 2,156 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 16:47 | 2,156 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 10 November 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 August 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
265 reactions across 20 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 139 | 52.5% | |
| ❤ | 61 | 23.0% | |
| 👍 | 41 | 15.5% | |
| ❤🔥 | 6 | 2.26% | |
| 👏 | 5 | 1.89% | |
| 🤔 | 4 | 1.51% | |
| 🤝 | 4 | 1.51% | |
| 🗿 | 3 | 1.13% | |
| 😐 | 2 | 0.755% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 265reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 November 2023 to 19 August 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Я давній фанат стейблів. Бо вони by design працюють набагато краще, ніж будь-яка фіатна валюта. Приклад: треба переказати гроші батькам з Дубаї в Україну. Через банк - місія неможлива, а через стейбл - 60 секунд. Просто відправляю 500 USDT, і за 10 секунд гроші вже там. Комісія? Ну може долар. Все. Ніяких айбанів, свіфтів і банківського цирку. Оце і є причина, чому я впевнений: майбутнє за стейблами. Трошки біль…
❤13👏3
HR Generalist ✔️ знайшов через канал, дякую ❤️ Наразі дуже шукаю Продакт Менеджера з досвідом розробки нон-кастодіальних воллетів, знаєте таких?
❤3🤔1🤝1
MacPaw завжди славилася сильними спеціалістами(тками), і я знаю, як непросто було туди потрапити. Скорочення це завжди реальний стрес для всіх сторін. Готовий підтримати нетворком або поспілкуватися про вакансії в Simple.app. Ми в Simple.app зараз шукаємо: Продакт Менеджера CRM Manager HR Generalist Middle Data Analyst Бронюй спілкування за посиланням – з радістю обговоримо можливості! https://calendly.com/oleksand…
❤29
Сьогодні рівно рік, як я в Simple, за чей час ми дуууже круто зросли по вім метриках AARRR фреймворку, але наразі нам потрібне посилення команди для підтримання нашої динаміки. Шукаю 1. Продакт менеджера з досвідом роботи у двосторонніх маркетплейсах 2. Продакт менеджера з досвідом крипто/фінтеху 3. СRM менеджера (крипто, гемблінг досвід) Основні побажання по всіх ролях: 1. Аналітичні люди, які максимально працюють…
🔥7❤1
Збір донатів в крипті наразі це нереально складно, тому скоро ми випустимо крипто банку для донатів
🔥21❤2
Також шукаю: ASO Manager Tik Tok Influencer Marketing Manager (Junior) CRM Manager
🔥4
Ємельянов на звʼязку ☎️ Мені потрібен динамічний Head of Marketing, щоб приєднатися до Simple.app – провідного крипто-проєкту з екосистемою продуктів для десятків мільйонів користувачів та мільйонів активних користувачів щотижня. Потрібен хтось із глибоким досвідом у фінтеху, крипті або підпискових сервісах, з чітким аналітичним мисленням і здатністю приймати незалежні рішення. Ти маєш бути стратегом, новатором і ч…
🔥2
Із цікавого за останній час – в телеграм боті 8М користувачів, в наших каналах по пару мільйонів, мільйон інсталів аппки і тд – вважаю, зробили цікавий експеремент. Зараз шукаю команду по ютуб відео, яка могла б швидко штампувати і анимувати educational video для Youtube за допомогою AI і інфи від наших інхаус експертів. Якщо знаєте когось - дайте інтро на @ymlnv
🔥11❤2
Наш бот Simple Tap сьогодні пробиває майлстоун у 1 000 000 користувачів. Коли я минулого вівторка на All Hands з командою казав, що ціль 1 000 000 юзерів, не мав на увазі що вже через тиждень. В групі Телеграм вже 550к, в 2х чатах досягли ліміту в 200к користувачів. Завдання далі – активувати юзерів в додатку, бо є інстали і KYC, але "з проходняка" не конвертяться. Праюємо далі.
🔥18❤3
Тестуємо з командою силу Телеграму. Останні пару тижнів працюю з ранку до 2х ночі, коли як, взагалі не впадлу, бо несеться. Зробили @simple_tap_bot. Наразі +100k юзерів в боті, +60k в каналі, десятки тисяч інсталлів додатку. Перший висновок, Телеграм - це🔥
🔥13🤔2
Друзі, чудовий ранок, щоб змінити місце роботи! 😀 Simple росте і я шукаю Product Lead на напрямок нашої академії — це підписочний edtech продукт з квізовою веб-веб воронкою. Якщо цікаво, напишіть в ЛС @ymlnv
🔥12🗿3🤝3
Що думаємо?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤🔥5👍2😐2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ymlnvchannel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Що думаємо?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Який слоган подобається більше?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 November 2023 to 19 August 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 1,227,315 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Продукти Ємельянова” (@ymlnvchannel), 2,156 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ymlnvchannel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.