国家动物博物馆谴责: 家长递标本任孩子踢打 8月29日,国家动物博物馆内,两名孩子在濒危动物展厅玩闹,用手抓、脚踢标本。 随行父亲非但不制止,反而拿起标本递给孩子,导致莽山原矛头蝮标本受损。 馆方表示强烈谴责,称这是性质恶劣的不文明参观行为。 受损标本已由专业人员修复,馆方感谢其他游客及时告知。 #国家动物博物馆 #不文明参观 #标本损坏 #家庭教育 [网易新闻]
Signed YM 编辑

Channel
@ym_yaowen
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
16,913subscribers
+117 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002260198845 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ym_yaowen |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 22 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 30 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ym_yaowen |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Aug 2026, 18:39 | 16,913 | +20 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 15:44 | 16,893 | +10 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 17:03 | 16,883 | -1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 15:36 | 16,884 | -1 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 16:47 | 16,885 | +14 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 16:22 | 16,871 | +23 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 13:46 | 16,848 | +30 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 23:38 | 16,818 | +11 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 10:23 | 16,807 | +10 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 10:58 | 16,797 | -6 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 07:26 | 16,803 | -2 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 10:16 | 16,805 | +1 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 10:04 | 16,804 | -6 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 18:06 | 16,810 | +1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 04:48 | 16,809 | -4 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 20:43 | 16,813 | +7 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 20:58 | 16,806 | +9 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 23:35 | 16,797 | +2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 02:01 | 16,795 | +2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:15 | 16,793 | first reading |
684 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 47 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 684 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 684 (7 August 2026 – 30 August 2026) |
| Views total | 30,504 |
| Reactions total | 3 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 30 Aug 2026, 14:48 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
3 reactions across 3 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2 | 66.7% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 33.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 684 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 684 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 30 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
国家动物博物馆谴责: 家长递标本任孩子踢打 8月29日,国家动物博物馆内,两名孩子在濒危动物展厅玩闹,用手抓、脚踢标本。 随行父亲非但不制止,反而拿起标本递给孩子,导致莽山原矛头蝮标本受损。 馆方表示强烈谴责,称这是性质恶劣的不文明参观行为。 受损标本已由专业人员修复,馆方感谢其他游客及时告知。 #国家动物博物馆 #不文明参观 #标本损坏 #家庭教育 [网易新闻]
Signed YM 编辑
重庆立法: 学校可禁学生带手机 2026年9月起,重庆施行新条例,学校可禁止学生携带手机入校,严控校园用网。 福建、广州、郑州等地已立法禁止学生带手机入校,国家层面教育部多次发文限制。 背景:2026年4月重庆一高三女生借摊主手机作弊,引发家长与摊主冲突,学校通报处理。 分析认为,立法禁止手机入校已成趋势,但需因地制宜审慎考量。 #重庆 #手机禁令 #未成年人 #教育 #立法 [网易新闻]
Signed YM 编辑
德专家: 中国军备扩张非自卫 德国基尔大学专家基希贝格尔指出,中国在和平时期用25年追赶西方军备,极不寻常。 中国已建成三艘航母,并成功研发电磁弹射系统,与美国同步。 卫星图像显示,中国沙漠腹地新建八角形建筑,疑为导弹防御系统。 专家认为,中国军备扩张目标并非自卫,而是试图超越美国。 国际观察者担忧中国对台湾的主张,习近平如何使用新军事力量备受关注。 #中国 #军备 #德国之声 #台湾 [德国之声]
Signed YM 编辑
江西省長葉建春涉稀土腐敗落馬 江西省委副書記、省長葉建春因涉嫌嚴重違紀違法被查。 據報導,葉建春家族涉足稀土生意,政商兩界頗有微詞。 其妻亦被帶走,相關報導已被刪除。 江西重稀土儲量佔中國約2/3,戰略價值高。 官方強調杜絕家族式腐敗,嚴防政商勾連。 #葉建春 #江西 #稀土 #反腐 [中央社]
Signed YM 编辑
尼泊尔洪灾致682死 外交部呼吁国际援助 8月26日尼泊尔-西藏边界发生冰川崩塌引发洪灾,造成682人死亡、3000人失踪。 灾后重建预计需40-50亿美元,尼泊尔已向国际社会请求专业支援。 美国地质调查所确认灾害由冰川崩塌引发,气候变迁加剧此类风险。 尼泊尔外长与中国外长王毅达成协议,将加强水文数据实时共享。 尼泊尔温室气体排放不足全球0.01%,却是气候变迁主要受害国之一。 喜马拉雅冰川加速融化威胁20亿下游人口,引发不可预测灾害风险。 #尼泊尔 #洪灾 #气候变迁 #喜马拉雅 [中央社]
Signed YM 编辑
中国隐形无人机GJ-21 现身辽宁进行试飞 8月19日和27日,中国隐形攻击无人机GJ-21在辽宁葫芦岛高速服务区上空被拍到试飞。 GJ-21是海军型隐形攻击无人机,去年胜利日阅兵首次亮相,近期罕见公开。 该机将由076型两栖攻击舰四川舰搭载,该舰已进入最后海试阶段,预计年底交付。 四川舰是全球首艘配备电磁弹射系统的两栖攻击舰,可起降固定翼飞机和无人机。 卫星图像显示四川舰与多艘军舰在青岛基地,可能进行联合测试。 #中国 #无人机 #航母 #台湾 #军事 [南华早报]
Signed YM 编辑
中国学者呼吁: 人工翻译把关AI政治译文 中国学者呼吁用人工翻译精炼AI翻译的政治话语,避免直译导致误解。 西安翻译学院教授李燕发文称,AI时代翻译能力是国家软实力的核心。 她指出,中国成语“韬光养晦”被AI直译为“隐藏光芒,滋养晦暗”,可能助长外界对中国战略意图的猜疑。 李燕建议将“韬光养晦”译为“保持谦逊,增强实力”,以体现和平发展理念。 她还提到“摸着石头过河”应意译为“渐进式改革”,便于外国受众理解。 #ai翻译 #中国 #政治话语 #软实力 #翻译 [南华早报]
Signed YM 编辑
韩国女子因用痒痒挠敲天花板 骚扰邻居被判罚款 韩国春川地方法院判处55岁女子A某200万韩元罚款,因其多次用痒痒挠敲击天花板并联系楼上邻居,构成跟踪骚扰罪。 A某自去年1月起因噪音问题与邻居B某发生纠纷,在B某要求其通过管理办公室投诉后,仍多次直接联系B某。 法院认定A某行为客观上足以引起对方焦虑或恐惧,不属于社会可接受范围。 A某还须完成40小时跟踪骚扰罪犯治疗项目。 #韩国 #跟踪骚扰 #噪音 #法院判决 [南华早报]
Signed YM 编辑
海湾国家转向自主防卫: 中国中东政策面临考验 伊朗战争进入第六个月,海湾国家转向自主防卫网络,与巴基斯坦、土耳其等签署军事协议。 美国和中国均未能保护海湾国家免受伊朗攻击,促使科威特、沙特等国寻求新合作伙伴。 分析认为,中国“参与而不承诺”策略面临挑战,其调解者角色可能被削弱。 专家指出,海湾国家正从“大国间对冲”转向“对冲依赖本身”,寻求战略自主。 #海湾国家 #伊朗战争 #中国中东政策 #军事合作 #战略自主 [南华早报]
Signed YM 编辑
特朗普新策略: 用改名湖泊转移视线 8月29日,特朗普发布AI生成视频,展示加拿大鹅在“美国湖”游行,回应将安大略湖改名。 此举旨在转移公众对伊朗战争和经济问题的关注,中期选举临近,其支持率仅30%左右。 此前,特朗普突然提及与金正恩会谈,并批评韩国,缩减联合军演。 白宫还宣传“14项近期胜利”,并计划用4亿美元购买广告宣传特朗普个人。 民主党批评这些举动“幼稚”,称是“可悲的转移注意力”。 #特朗普 #美国政治 #中期选举 #加拿大 #伊朗战争 [南华早报]
Signed YM 编辑
澳大利亚拟改革: 社交媒体算法可自选 社会服务部长Tanya Plibersek表示,社交媒体在青少年性暴力及窒息行为增加中扮演重要角色。 澳政府正考虑允许用户选择是否使用社交媒体算法,并考虑效仿英国禁止色情内容中的勒颈和窒息描写。 这些措施将纳入第二个结束对妇女儿童暴力的国家行动计划。 #澳大利亚 #社交媒体 #算法 #性暴力 #政策 [卫报:Krishani Dhanji]
Signed YM 编辑
OpenAI终止与Cursor合作: 因SpaceX收购引发信任危机 OpenAI宣布将终止向Cursor提供模型,提议11月12日切断服务。 OpenAI称基于与马斯克公司过往违约经历,无法信任SpaceX遵守条款。 Cursor CEO表示OpenAI模型仅占其用户流量5%,正与OpenAI协商。 此次事件是马斯克与奥特曼长期争端的延续,马斯克曾起诉OpenAI。 #openai #cursor #spacex #马斯克 [cnbc]
Signed YM 编辑
Showing the 12 most recent of 684 posts we hold for @ym_yaowen. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@ym_yaowen named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“YM 要闻” (@ym_yaowen), 16,913 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ym_yaowen.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.