Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

YCLIENTS

@yjournal

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

20,261subscribers

-15 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001210792377
TypeChannel
Username@yjournal
DescriptionОнлайн-запись и автоматизация Поддержка: VK: https://clck.ru/3T5NfC Макс: https://clck.ru/3T5NkZ Тел.: 8-800-505-04-75, 8-800-505-41-13 Задать вопрос: @yjournal_dm Включен в перечень персональных страниц Роскомнадзора: https://clck.ru/3Gm6m9
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/yjournal

Growth

20,25920,27620,267.56 August 2026 — 20,276 subscribers6 August 2026 — 20,276 subscribers7 August 2026 — 20,270 subscribers8 August 2026 — 20,266 subscribers9 August 2026 — 20,263 subscribers10 August 2026 — 20,259 subscribers11 August 2026 — 20,261 subscribers20,2616 August 202611 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 5 days, net -15. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20,256–20,279 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 16:0920,261+2
10 Aug 2026, 16:2320,259-4
9 Aug 2026, 14:1320,263-3
8 Aug 2026, 14:5120,266-4
7 Aug 2026, 16:3020,270-6
6 Aug 2026, 20:4520,276no change
6 Aug 2026, 20:3320,276first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 10 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
18.1%
avg views ÷ 20,261 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,670
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.486%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held15 (10 July 202612 August 2026)
Views total47,690
Reactions total232
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 23:26 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,870
Videos
107
Links
620

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

290 reactions across 15 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54338140510439448668529.3%
🔥8529.3%
👍7325.2%
🥰175.86%
👏103.45%
🤔82.76%
😍62.07%
😱51.72%
🤩10.345%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 290reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 15 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @yjournal. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
20.0%
3 of 15 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
3
posts carrying an erid · 3 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
4,000
over 3 measured posts
Median views · rest
3,810
over 12 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2VtzqwCjDrS117 July 202617 July 2026
2VtzqwCyKKQ115 July 202615 July 2026
2VtzqwQZQVY110 July 202610 July 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

31 Jul 2026, 10:04 UTC≈3,820 views17 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

✖️Продолжаем разбирать ошибки при закупке, которые мешают салону зарабатывать больше Вместе с iBT.ru сегодня рассмотрим еще две ошибки. 🔵Ошибка четвертая: ограничивать гостей в выборе из-за ожидания крупной закупки. Сужаете меню услуг и временно убираете какие-то позиции, чтобы спланировать закупку нужного объема? В условиях ограниченного выбора клиент может почувствовать дискомфорт и уйти к конкурентам. 🔵Ошибка п

👍6🔥6custom 54338140510439448663👏2

30 Jul 2026, 12:20 UTC≈3,440 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

💬 Управляйте каналами для отправки уведомлений в YCLIENTS и экономьте деньги В YCLIENTS теперь можно выбрать приоритетные и резервные каналы для отправки уведомлений клиентам и сотрудникам. Это позволит вам минимизировать число одинаковых сообщений у клиента и сэкономить на платных рассылках . ↖️Создайте общий порядок отправки уведомлений в разделе Настройки → Уведомления → Каскады уведомлений → Общие настройки кас

👍3🔥2🤔2😱2custom 54338140510439448662

29 Jul 2026, 13:15 UTC≈3,130 views12 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Розыгрыш продолжается 🎁 Мы запустили розыгрыш лицензий, и у вас еще есть время, чтобы присоединиться. 🟡 Что разыгрываем: 5 клиентов получат промокод на 30 000 ₽ для оплаты YCLIENTS 🟡 Условия участия: → Подписаться на наш канал в МАКС. → Нажать кнопку «Участвовать» под закрепленным постом в МАКС Итоги подведем 12 августа. Времени еще много, но лучше не откладывать на последний день 🔜 Участвовать

🔥6👍3custom 54338140510439448663

28 Jul 2026, 12:01 UTC≈3,610 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

📲 Сотрудники не пропустят ни одного изменения в записи В YCLIENTS появилась бесплатная интеграция «МАКС — уведомления для сотрудников». Теперь ваши сотрудники будут моментально узнавать обо всех изменениях в записях прямо в мессенджере. ↖️Как подключить: Сотрудник добавляет мессенджер МАКС к нужным Типам уведомлений в разделе Настройки → Уведомления. ↖️Как работать сотрудникам: В профиле каждого мастера появляется

custom 54338140510439448665🤔2

22 Jul 2026, 09:25 UTC≈4,590 views39 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Получите 30 000 ₽ к лицензии YCLIENTS за подписку на наш канал 💛 Нам точно не нужен повод, чтобы порадовать вас. Поэтому мы решили разыграть лицензии YCLIENTS. 📎 Что разыгрываем: 5 клиентов получат промокод на 30 000 ₽ для оплаты YCLIENTS 📎 Что нужно сделать: → Подписаться на наш канал в МАКС. → Нажать кнопку «Участвовать» под закрепленным постом в МАКС. 📎 Кто может участвовать: Участвовать могут все клиенты — те

custom 543381405104394486618👍10🥰5🤔3😱3

21 Jul 2026, 13:40 UTC≈4,060 views55 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🛏 Почему разрешить сотрудникам спать на работе — хорошая идея Бизнесом в сфере услуг можно управлять жестко, через штрафы и контроль. А можно, наоборот, при помощи доверия и заботы о мастерах. Сооснователь сети студий красоты Wonder Look Анна Магай установила в одном из салонов кровать и разрешает сотрудникам спать на рабочем месте во время окон между клиентами. По словам Анны, она тоже работала мастером и понимает

👍33🔥16custom 54338140510439448665🤔1

20 Jul 2026, 11:50 UTC≈3,810 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

💬 Три главных канала для привлечения новых клиентов в салон в 2026 году Сооснователь сети студий красоты Wonder Look Анна Магай поделилась тремя каналами, которые за наименьшую цену приводят новых клиентов: 🔘Платный трафик на сайт. Однако важно, чтобы сайт был не просто визиткой, но позволял клиенту легко и быстро записаться на визит. 🔘ВКонтакте. Количество обращений через эту соцсеть увеличилось в несколько раз,

🔥4🥰3custom 54338140510439448663

17 Jul 2026, 14:02 UTC≈3,910 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Advertisementerid 2VtzqwCjDrSPhoto

✖️ Не делайте так при закупке Мы продолжаем разбор ошибок вместе с iBT.ru. Сегодня — еще две. *️⃣ Ошибка вторая: закупать одни оксиды для разных брендов. В большинстве случаев цвет ляжет ровно. Но риск остается. Если компоненты не совпадут, то получите зеленый или красный блонд. Вместо красивого оттенка — проблемы. Клиента после такого не вернуть. *️⃣ Ошибка третья: работать на привычных брендах и игнорировать спро

👍5🔥2custom 54338140510439448662

17 Jul 2026, 11:00 UTC≈3,720 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Posted without readable text

🔥6🥰2custom 54338140510439448662

16 Jul 2026, 14:10 UTC≈3,960 views21 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Posted without readable text

🔥10custom 54338140510439448666😍5

15 Jul 2026, 14:33 UTC≈4,000 views14 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Advertisementerid 2VtzqwCyKKQPhoto

🛒5 ошибок при закупке расходников, которые незаметно «съедают» прибыль салона Закупка расходников — привычный процесс, который редко пересматривают. А зря: именно в нем чаще всего скрываются незаметные потери прибыли. Рынок меняется, поставщики уходят, а старые схемы работы остаются. Вместе с iBT.ru запускаем серию постов, где разберем 5 ошибок, которые мешают салону зарабатывать больше. 🦞 Первая ошибка: продолжать

custom 54338140510439448666🔥5🥰3

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @yjournal. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 201,426 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“YCLIENTS” (@yjournal), 20,261 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yjournal.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.