Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 🍀伊伊淺唱聆聽👧賴11tw

Channel

🍀伊伊淺唱聆聽👧賴11tw

@yiyi21211

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

5,141subscribers

+6 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001910430750
TypeChannel
Username@yiyi21211
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/yiyi21211

Growth

5,1295,1425,135.56 August 2026 — 5,135 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,129 subscribers10 August 2026 — 5,134 subscribers13 August 2026 — 5,142 subscribers16 August 2026 — 5,141 subscribers5,1416 August 202616 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 10 days, net +6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,127–5,144 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 20:065,141-1
13 Aug 2026, 11:285,142+8
10 Aug 2026, 10:515,134+5
7 Aug 2026, 09:105,129-6
6 Aug 2026, 19:315,135first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 18 October 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.65%
avg views ÷ 5,141 subscribers
Avg views / post
136
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
6
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held20 (18 October 20256 August 2026)
Views total818
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 04:44 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 16:14 UTC134 viewsread 12 August 2026
Voice message

想太多 是我想太多 你總這樣說 但你卻沒有 真的心疼我 是我想太多 我也這樣說 這是唯一能 安慰我的理由

Signed 🍀努力賣茶の伊伊

6 Aug 2026, 15:55 UTC116 viewsread 12 August 2026
Voice message

歌名: 我不難過 原唱: 孫燕姿 亂唱: 伊伊 終於你開口向我訴說她有多溫柔 雖然你還握著我的手 但我已不在 你心中 我真的懂 你不是喜新厭舊 是我沒有 陪在你身邊當你寂寞時候 別再看著我說著你愛過 別太傷痛 我不難過 這不算什麼 只是為什麼眼淚會流我也不懂 請忽略伊伊後面🤣忘詞惹哈哈哈哈

Signed 🍀努力賣茶の伊伊

6 Aug 2026, 15:55 UTC127 viewsread 12 August 2026
Voice message

歌曲: 祝你愛我到天荒地老⭐ 原唱: 顏人中 亂唱: 伊伊 到 底患了什麼病症 天 色漸晚時我最愛分神 荒 蕪的心事認真 地 在撩人 老 想給你最甜蜜的眼神 不 想假裝矜持錯過緣分 離 你愛我還有幾個時辰

Signed 🍀努力賣茶の伊伊

6 Aug 2026, 15:55 UTC142 viewsread 12 August 2026
Voice message

未完結的愛 ⭐ 總是 翻來覆去 愛很透明 卻找不出問題 怎麼走到這裡 誰又能說清 忘不掉 你帶給我的吻 給我的安穩 帶給我的恨 也許我愛得太沉 太過天真 換不得永恆

Signed 🍀努力賣茶の伊伊

6 Aug 2026, 15:55 UTC119 viewsread 12 August 2026
Voice message

歌名: 不能說的秘密 ⭐ 原唱: 周杰倫 亂唱: 伊伊 冷咖啡離開了杯墊 我忍住的情緒在很後面 拼命想挽回的從前 在我臉上依舊清晰可見 最美的不是下雨天 是曾與妳躲過雨的屋簷 回憶的畫面 在盪著鞦韆 夢開始不甜 妳說把愛漸漸 放下會走更遠 又何必去改變 已錯過的時間 妳用妳的指尖 阻止我說再見 想像妳在身邊

Signed 🍀努力賣茶の伊伊

4 Aug 2026, 06:19 UTC180 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @twyy520Voice message

歌名: 到時說愛我⭐ 原唱: 茜拉 亂唱: 伊伊 他的體溫 不保溫 形成疑問 他的暱稱 已改稱 一句陌生 寂寞總夜裡挑撥 挑戰人意志的薄弱 不願心跳永遠沈默 緊隨愛的線索 去失落 去失措 這就是生活 如果沒如果 左右結果 我們只能注定錯過 喔 在未來才遇見的你聽我說 到時候記得說愛我

Signed 🍀努力賣茶の伊伊

24 Oct 2025, 04:36 UTC≈3,130 viewsread 12 August 2026
Voice message

我們的歌 - 王力宏 己經聽了一百遍 怎麼聽都不會倦 從白天唱到黑夜 你一直在身邊 如果世界太危險 只有音樂最安全 帶著我進夢裡面 讓歌詞都實現

Signed 🍀努力賣茶の伊伊👧賴11tw

24 Oct 2025, 04:36 UTC≈2,960 viewsread 12 August 2026
Voice message

我們的歌 - 王力宏 己經聽了一百遍 怎麼聽都不會倦 從白天唱到黑夜 你一直在身邊 如果世界太危險 只有音樂最安全 帶著我進夢裡面 讓歌詞都實現

Signed 🍀努力賣茶の伊伊👧賴11tw

24 Oct 2025, 04:36 UTC≈2,660 viewsread 12 August 2026
Voice message

Mine Mine - 周杰倫 我的眼皮跳一下 代表你在想我 我的耳朵癢一下 代表你在講我壞話 我沒這麼不好吧 不用跟朋友說吧

Signed 🍀努力賣茶の伊伊👧賴11tw

24 Oct 2025, 04:36 UTC≈1,970 viewsread 12 August 2026
Voice message

秋刀魚 的滋味 貓跟妳都想了解 初戀的香味就這樣被我們尋回 那溫暖 的陽光 像剛摘的鮮豔草莓 你說妳捨不得吃掉這一種感覺 雨下整夜 我的愛溢出就像雨水 院子落葉 跟我的思念厚厚一疊 幾句是非 也無法將我的熱情冷卻 妳出現在我詩的每一頁

Signed 🍀努力賣茶の伊伊👧賴11tw

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @yiyi21211. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 674,666 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 21 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🍀伊伊淺唱聆聽👧賴11tw” (@yiyi21211), 5,141 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yiyi21211.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.