Topic
Adult — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (qwen3.6:35b-a3b, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 November 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 79% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. This entry also forms a group of 2 channels linked by matching posts. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 4 of the 4 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 10 comparable posts for this entry, running 21 October 2026 to 11 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
- Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
- 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
- shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
- Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Of the group of 2 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @cph994. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 12 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Channels linked by matching posts
This channel is in a group of 2 registered channels linked by matching posts. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
Growth
Growth history is still building. We hold one measurement for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.
Engagement
11 posts held, back to 21 October 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 5 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 9.44%
- avg views ÷ 30,440 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2,870
- 11 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.019%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 11
- of 11 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 431
- Videos
- 168
- Links
- 33
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 57s
- Average length
- 11s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 21 October 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 11 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
11 Nov 2026, 15:12 UTC402 viewsread 13 November 2026 Photo
🎁更多抽奖: https://t.me/cuivd
🎟️ 抽奖标题:娜莎福利上车
📪抽奖说明:中奖者机器人会发送中奖信息
中奖截图联系 @abc1970004573
🎫 参与条件:
🎫 加入-义乌个人上课娜莎 《不是中介 口嗨勿扰》
🎫 加入-义乌极品公开
🎫 加入-义乌修车极品
🎁 奖品内容:
💰️ 半价卷1P × 1
💰️ 口令红包18 × 1
💰️ 夜优惠500 × 5
📅 开奖时间:2026-11-14 12:00自动开奖
👉 参与抽奖链接: https://t.me/cj888999bot?start=join-L179440973476
8 Nov 2026, 05:34 UTC705 viewsread 13 November 2026 Video
😘义乌金华全裸5T全场00后
😂义乌金华全新豪华大场房间带门
全场 😍🤩__😍0️⃣位技师任军挑选🇸🇰🚀👌📱😂
不辜负客户不夸大宣传没有套路只
有真诚只要您需要对接内场无套路
🫣🫣🫣🫣🫣🫣🫣🫣🫣🫣🫣
全身放松 ⭐️ 全身推油 ⭐️ 互动调情
龙舞抓波 ⭐️ 舌吸咪咪 ⭐️ 胸推调情
环游世界 ⭐️ 海底捞月 ⭐️ 双乳弹跳
过肩舌滑 ⭐️ 花式舔蛋 ⭐️ 一飞冲天
花式出水 ⭐️ 裸式胸推 ⭐️ 花式臀推
玉足足交 ⭐️ 射胸射足 ⭐️ 花式舔棒
🫣🫣🫣🫣🫣🫣🫣🫣🫣🫣🫣
一直传承全方位整套会所服务
为男人打造尊享服务!
到店排钟🏋️♀️一对一服务
停车方便 明码标价 安全靠谱
☺️☺️☺️☺️☺️☺️☺️
《🌟🌟😍😍🥰😛💥》不充卡,不办卡😵
激情全裸…
3 Nov 2026, 08:35 UTC≈1,840 viewsread 13 November 2026 Photo
全国林妹高端外围【大⭕️圈】
#定金预约 本群已担保
💎专注各市区修车 🈶洋马,空姐,少妇,萝莉, 学妹 御姐等高素质高颜值🉑上门 🈶教室
✡️奢华的环境、全套服务、至尊享受、帝王体验
没有玩过大圈的建议先点下方频道查看规则
♏️双向客服林妹: @wai998bot
♒️总频道: 频道点击浏览👀
#本群推荐信誉客服 24小时接待联系即可
2 Nov 2026, 12:59 UTC≈2,010 viewsread 13 November 2026 Video
🔴义乌首家高端莞式海选SPA🔴
新项目新团队励志走向义乌巅峰spa店
💯义乌旗舰店💯网红店 SPA🔵聘各店之红牌,铸就本店巅峰颜值,实体口碑店(颜控首选)👍
✈️✈️海选(60分钟全裸,全裸)
【服务模式】全裸
全场海选模式:每天出勤10➕👙各类高颜值,极品嫩菜,带您体验前所未有的视觉盛宴🫠
🔮 主打高颜值🔮服务一流。
💰新店开业特价 3️⃣9️⃣9️⃣
🎼劲爆来袭
🎼劲爆来袭
♥️独立浴室✨私密性强✨高质量服务
😀致力打造SPA届的巅峰、理想天堂圣地🖤
【温馨提示】
♥️无套路、不办卡、没有任何隐形消费! 先体验后买单,用心做口碑♥️
性价比天花板,五星级享受,灵魂最终的归宿☂️
💯安全💯稳定💯可靠
电话:17879310387
预约电报:@Axmyydskk
机器人双向:@ximujiqiren_bot
QQ:2782321084
欢迎进入交流群:点击预览详细👀
…
2 Nov 2026, 04:53 UTC≈2,090 views1 reactionsread 13 November 2026 Photo
义乌高端秘境 95SPA💦💦💦
电报:@hahajiejie456
QQ:1621407177
频道: 频道点击浏览👀
原价 699,预约价 499
服务内容👀美女全裸服务👙进去先帮大哥洗澡,跪下给哥哥口💦高山流水👄水中潇👙胸推👙臀推调情🥰毒龙钻🫴嘴刮痧👄嘴拔罐👄口吹,激情口爆🫦回龙潇,结束服务洗澡🌊
👍私密安全 🛡安全保障
💸明码标价 ❌无办卡 🚫无套路
🥰方便停车 出入安心
🥰各种制服💃主题剧情
保证真人真照,每天出勤 20➕高端
❤1
30 Oct 2026, 07:42 UTC≈3,060 views0 reactionsread 13 November 2026 Photo
义乌 东阳 金华 主打高性价比高质量妹妹,课室的,外出的应有尽有。
🚗另外全国一二三线城市都可以安排小姐姐上门
😘上课联系:@chiyuaa
⭕️流程:下方各区上课资料,看好了截图或者告诉我,我会给你发具体位置,约好时间。到了地方之后拍照片给我
⭕️所有工作室都是见人付款,没有前期费用。
✅所有服务问题—见到人—妹子本人会给你做起具体介绍,每个妹子服务都不一样,各有差异,具体面谈!
✅到地方如果看不上/或者价格不合适,如果同一个地方有多位,可以换人、也可以撤退,不存在留客不让走,没有套路-诚信第一!
😘上课联系:@chiyuaa
————————————————
🧝🏻♀️选妃频道:点击预览👀
🤖唯一 QQ:3887459317
开课时间12:00-----凌晨4:00
29 Oct 2026, 06:38 UTC≈3,450 viewsread 13 November 2026 Photo
义乌 东阳 金华 主打高性价比高质量妹妹,课室的,外出的应有尽有。
🚗另外全国一二三线城市都可以安排小姐姐上门
😘上课联系:@chiyuaa
⭕️流程:下方各区上课资料,看好了截图或者告诉我,我会给你发具体位置,约好时间。到了地方之后拍照片给我
⭕️所有工作室都是见人付款,没有前期费用。
✅所有服务问题—见到人—妹子本人会给你做起具体介绍,每个妹子服务都不一样,各有差异,具体面谈!
✅到地方如果看不上/或者价格不合适,如果同一个地方有多位,可以换人、也可以撤退,不存在留客不让走,没有套路-诚信第一!
😘上课联系:@chiyuaa
————————————————
🧝🏻♀️选妃频道:点击预览👀
🤖唯一 QQ:3887459317
开课时间12:00-----凌晨4:00
26 Oct 2026, 10:39 UTC≈3,910 viewsread 13 November 2026 Photo
【重磅活动修车 福利多多!】
< 公寓模式,一个房间,一个妹子,安排不满意,可换 东阳 金华 义乌 永康 横店都可以 就近安排 >
活动项目①
原价698元,活动价*499 服务内容1:美女全裸陪洗澡胸推,臀推水中萧擦干水到床上
按摩胸推臀推过水漫游,刮痧毛扫 毒龙调情吹箫,口爆一次(也可加小费做全套一般➕2.3张)
回笼萧整个服务过程60分钟
【诚信靠谱 ,主打服务口碑 专做回头客】
从咨询到售后,确保您满意。选择迈巴赫,品质服务,流畅体验,尽在掌握!立即行动,开启您的专属之旅
唯一客服:@lidingyong
备用客服:@wuhanwei12
Q:99265381
☎️:15171083756
机器人🤖@weizong1314bot
频道: 点击浏览👀
🔰【评论区必看 】 ⬇️⬇️⬇️
24 Oct 2026, 11:04 UTC≈4,360 viewsread 13 November 2026 Video
义乌😎😎高端纯欲95SPA👄💦💦💦
原价599.预约499 #双人同行优惠30
义乌纯欲💦💦💦
靓妹🌃。有豪华工作室
服务内容👀美女全裸服务👙陪洗澡💦高山流水👄水中潇👙胸推👙臀推调情🥰毒龙钻🫴嘴刮痧👄嘴拔罐👄口吹,激情口爆🫦回龙潇,结束服务洗澡🌊
预约vx:
预约QQ:530879571
电报客服 @yhj6666
电报客服: @kdd2005916
双向机器人 @@yqq19990724_bot。
选妃频道:点击预览👀
小课程,亲民大众系 妩媚型安摩騷妹,专业中小调理。形象落落大方,热情真诚周到。实打实的技术流,兢兢业业,时间充足,不偷懒不耍滑。设备发齐全,酥爽放松,堪称解压神器。
小弟已去替老板验证,主打就是年轻靓妹,骚妹,大胸妹。
保证真人真照,每天出勤 #几十➕高端
#义乌靠谱商家会所 #群管认证
24 Oct 2026, 05:31 UTC≈4,420 viewsread 13 November 2026 Photo
🟡昵称:#呆小雨
🕐地区:#廿三里街道
🤖双向: @daixiayu5bot
🚀电报:@xiaoyu881
🔴水费:📤课表查看图📤
#禁收车费定金和没见人就给课费
21 Oct 2026, 08:06 UTC≈5,370 viewsread 13 November 2026 Photo
😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀
高级桑拿会所🏳️🌈🏳️🌈🏳️🌈🏳️🌈至尊帝王享受
📱📱📱📱📱📱📱📱📱📱📱📱📱📱😀😀😀😀😀
👍无任何定金 ❤️满意再消费
🩷定期体检 🤬安全保证
🥵足钟足时 🤘不催不事
🥰环境高端 📸5年老店铺
🎉先体验🪩后消费❤️优质靠谱
😀😀店里😀😀基本应有尽有的🍓
😀😀📱📱😀😀➖3️⃣0️⃣
📱📱子不满意 换到满意为止
😀😀不满意的 没有任何费用
😀😀😀😀 😀😀😀😀
🤣帝王享受 花式服务 丝袜诱惑😈
👎鸳鸯戏水 水磨推拿 口舌调情🍓
🍓胯下毒龙 情趣制服 花式调情🍓
👅滚水吸皮 SM调教 激情澎湃🔞
🍓到店海选 手推胸推 足交臀推 🤑
😀😀 免费停车 交通便利
☝️无套路,🎉安全靠谱
😂满足老板的👍一切需求
时间:60-70分钟(无限火力)
价格:💴299-599💵
🔜主打…
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @yiwu88779. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“义乌极品公开” (@yiwu88779), 30,440 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yiwu88779.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.