Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 东莞南城日式av电影版水床泡泡服务95/98个人工作室——莹莹,双飞姐妹/夜课都可约

Channel

东莞南城日式av电影版水床泡泡服务95/98个人工作室——莹莹,双飞姐妹/夜课都可约

@yingtao992

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,292subscribers

+22 since we began measuring on 15 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002438705430
TypeChannel
Username@yingtao992
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded15 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/yingtao992

Growth

1,2701,2921,28115 Aug 2026, 08:20 — 1,270 subscribers15 Aug 2026, 08:30 — 1,270 subscribers16 Aug 2026, 18:12 — 1,292 subscribers15 Aug 2026, 08:2016 Aug 2026, 18:12
3 measurements spanning 1 day, net +22. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,267–1,295 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 18:121,292+22
15 Aug 2026, 08:301,270no change
15 Aug 2026, 08:201,270first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 1 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
26.0%
avg views ÷ 1,292 subscribers
Avg views / post
336
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.106%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held20 (1 June 202615 August 2026)
Views total3,696
Reactions total1
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 08:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 07s
Average length
34s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

6 reactions across 5 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 83.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
583.3%
👍116.7%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 June 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

15 Aug 2026, 03:54 UTC84 viewsread 15 August 2026

报告模板 反馈报告 上课时间:8.15 验证留名:飞仔 所在位置:南城 老师名称:#樱桃 上课价格:1000pp 妹子年龄:28 妹子容貌:9 妹子身材:9 服务态度:10 环境设备:10 自由评论:提前一天预约好老师第二天准时到达,进门先交水费,老师有陪浴水中萧,第一次玩水床,老师的水床服务绝了,浑身涂满了润滑液,缓慢的游走着我身上的每一寸肌肤,水床轻微晃动着好舒服,舒服的差点睡着了。泡泡🐻推服务我是人生第一次尝试,奶香奶香的,那大奶感觉都能把人闷死😂。回房间干正事,先做 背部按摩放松,老师手法专业,舒服。课表上的项目都有,老师的服务估计无人能敌从上到下那叫个爽,还有哈气漫游和吹箫叫我一会上天一会入地,爽的我嗷嗷叫,69服务也很顶,赶紧让老师给我戴套,先是女上,逼紧水多,后来换传教士猛猛抽插出水。喜欢服务系的狼友们我极力推荐樱桃老师👍🏻 交流群 https://t.me/+HOwYGEQO0GE0N2Nl

Signed 南城~莹莹95.98

15 Aug 2026, 01:16 UTC99 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo

全天在线哦,水床泡泡约起,男宠们

Signed 南城~莹莹95.98

10 Aug 2026, 03:55 UTC358 views1 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

跟我在一起只要求三点,深点,用力点,久一点。开课了水床泡泡浴约起,在线等你哦

1

Signed 南城~莹莹95.98

9 Aug 2026, 06:10 UTC385 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo

别人送你金包银,我只能送你纸包精。开课了男宠们,水床泡泡浴在线哦

Signed 南城~莹莹95.98

7 Aug 2026, 05:39 UTC436 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo

做不了生活的主人,做你可以吗。开课了水床泡泡浴约起,男宠们

Signed 南城~莹莹95.98

5 Aug 2026, 05:26 UTC618 viewsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @ahkkn123456Video

宝子们开课啦!水床泡泡浴服务全天可约❤️

Signed 南城~莹莹95.98

5 Aug 2026, 05:08 UTC589 views0 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

好久不见,宝子们,水床泡泡浴开课了

Signed 南城~莹莹95.98

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @yingtao992. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“东莞南城日式av电影版水床泡泡服务95/98个人工作室——莹莹,双飞姐妹/夜课都可约” (@yingtao992), 1,292 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yingtao992.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.