Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 全球大事件新闻

Channel

全球大事件新闻

@ygf333

Has discussion group2 usernames

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Cite this entry

35,469subscribers

+13,402 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001620792341
TypeChannel
Usernames@qqdsj99 @ygf333
Description全球大事件新闻|专注东南亚华人圈最新动态与区域热点资讯,持续关注斯里兰卡、柬埔寨、缅甸、泰国、老挝等地社会事件、突发资讯、国际资讯、华人动态与真实故事。 这里记录海外华人圈大小事,分享一线消息与区域动态,让你第一时间掌握东南亚最新资讯。 ⚠️ 所有内容仅供参考,不代表任何立场,请理性阅读,自行甄别信息真实性。 💬 欢迎文明交流,拒绝恶意攻击与引战,共同维护良好讨论氛围。 投稿联系: @XW77_BOT
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 November 2026
Measurements held107
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/ygf333

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 59% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 6 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@THG189/108188 Aug 2026, 00:01 UTC@ygf333/27805 · this entry8 Aug 2026, 00:01 UTC1.00under a minute
@THG189/108208 Aug 2026, 00:34 UTC@ygf333/27807 · this entry8 Aug 2026, 00:34 UTC1.00under a minute
@THG189/108308 Aug 2026, 01:07 UTC@ygf333/27820 · this entry8 Aug 2026, 01:07 UTC1.00under a minute
@THG189/109048 Aug 2026, 16:42 UTC@ygf333/28054 · this entry8 Aug 2026, 16:43 UTC1.00under a minute
@THG189/109349 Aug 2026, 01:58 UTC@ygf333/28088 · this entry9 Aug 2026, 01:58 UTC1.00under a minute
@THG189/110079 Aug 2026, 17:39 UTC@ygf333/28211 · this entry9 Aug 2026, 17:39 UTC1.00under a minute
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@THG18934 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@THG189 (33–1)
@huisedny9 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0038 minutesthis entry (9–0)
@gtkx16 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0074 minutesthis entry (5–1)
@quanwangdsj5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0074 minutesthis entry (5–0)
@xhuids6685 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.9865 minutesthis entry (5–0)
@DNYBG2345 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.001.7 hoursthis entry (5–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 34 of the 34 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 517 comparable posts for this entry, running 7 August 2026 to 10 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

12,38235,47423,92835,4697 August 20269 November 2026
107 measurements spanning 94 days, net +13,402. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,918–38,938 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 107
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Nov 2026, 23:3635,469-5
9 Nov 2026, 17:3935,474+10,017
8 Nov 2026, 11:4825,457+2,169
8 Nov 2026, 07:1623,288+856
7 Nov 2026, 09:1722,432-34
7 Nov 2026, 00:5022,466+989
6 Nov 2026, 07:5721,477+104
5 Nov 2026, 23:4721,373+661
5 Nov 2026, 04:2920,712-1
4 Nov 2026, 22:0420,713+885
4 Nov 2026, 02:2619,828-9
3 Nov 2026, 18:5919,837+888
2 Nov 2026, 23:0818,949no change
2 Nov 2026, 19:1818,949+890
1 Nov 2026, 20:3518,059no change
1 Nov 2026, 20:0918,059+867
31 Oct 2026, 20:4117,192+771
31 Oct 2026, 17:0616,421+963
30 Oct 2026, 18:0915,458no change
30 Oct 2026, 17:2615,458first reading

Engagement

738 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 77 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.58%
avg views ÷ 35,469 subscribers
Avg views / post
915
175 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
175
of 738 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held738 (7 August 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total160,193
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 04:43 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈25,400
Videos
≈11,900
Links
≈2,680

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2h 35m
Average length
47s

Measured directly from 199 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 175 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

11 Nov 2026, 04:33 UTC594 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

现在网络上的病毒、木马和恶意链接越来越多,传播手段也层出不穷。 不少人想方设法通过各种群聊、频道、私信和文件分享植入病毒,稍有不慎,点击一个陌生链接,就可能导致设备中毒,甚至造成账号被盗、个人信息泄露和财产损失。 提醒大家:不明链接不要随意点击,陌生文件不要轻易下载,来历不明的软件不要安装。 尤其是各种群聊和频道里发布的链接,一定要提高警惕。 网络环境复杂,防不胜防。多一分谨慎,少一分风险,别因为一时大意,让自己的设备和资产受到损失。 关注频道 @ygf333 投稿 @XW77_BOT

11 Nov 2026, 04:26 UTC859 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

🇲🇾马来西亚霹雳州警方查获48台比特币矿机,疑涉非法接电挖矿 11月10日,马来西亚霹雳州警方联合国家能源公司(TNB)工作人员,在霹雳州 Seri Iskandar 一处住宅展开突击行动,现场查获48台比特币挖矿设备,怀疑有人通过非法连接电线的方式盗用电力进行加密货币挖矿。 据警方消息,执法人员在行动中还查获2台 Fast Ethernet 交换机、1台互联网路由器及1卷被剪断的电缆等物品。警方初步怀疑,该住宅被用于非法加密货币挖矿活动,相关人员涉嫌未经许可连接电力线路,逃避正常电费支出。 目前,警方已针对案件展开进一步调查,并将依据《刑事法典》第427条及《1990年电力供应法》第31(1)条追查相关责任人。 关注频道 @ygf333 投稿 @XW77_BOT

11 Nov 2026, 04:13 UTC840 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

#网友投稿 一共四个人,都说在国内 后面发现有问题一个人没给订,三个人订了11号的票,今天发现被退票了,给我说是小白没有做过,着急出来,我给朋友推他的公司,花了一万八的机票 今天票务发现票被退款到他个人卡里,大家注意一下这四个人,别被骗了 关注频道 @ygf333 投稿 @XW77_BOT

11 Nov 2026, 04:08 UTC902 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

#网友投稿:现在本地人真是饿疯了,在街上看到几个拖行李箱的中国人,就说中国人又回西港找工作了,意思是马上回暖了,然后他们柬埔寨人也有工作了,也是真饿了,出现幻觉了? 关注频道 @ygf333 投稿 @XW77_BOT

11 Nov 2026, 03:56 UTC933 viewsread 11 November 2026
Video

#网友投稿:🇹🇭马来西亚柔佛新山在今天凌晨5点的时候,移民局在小姐住的公寓抓了一车小姐,现在都不去场子抓了,直接直捣大本营!!!! 关注频道 @ygf333 投稿 @XW77_BOT

11 Nov 2026, 03:47 UTC932 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

#网友爆光 本人因同乡关系认识柬埔寨西港独立大道长沙杨裕兴饭店老板(化名强别、许文强)。平时常去他店里吃饭,也帮他介绍生意。当时他在店里请客时说菲律宾好赚钱,认识老板有面子,让我过去看看。因是同乡且有店面,未起疑心。 到菲律宾后对方收走护照,直接开车送到园区盘口,保安不让离开,说需Boss同意,才发现被骗。过程中手机行李全丢。等重新买到手机联系上朋友时,14天签证已逾期。后联系他本人要求离开并警告报警,他才让公司归还护照放我走。 此人卖人坑人,无底线。经打听,他还骗过别人转走钱财、卖掉别人存放的物品,并忽悠约20名老乡和顾客到菲律宾、缅甸做盘口。其真实信息(姓肖,含身份证号)已掌握,正在国内对接报警。如有其他受害者,欢迎一起举报。 因手机丢失,联系方式不全。与他有联系的人注意:他任何话和拖延理由都别信。多行不义必自毙。 关注频道 @ygf333 投稿 @XW77_BOT

11 Nov 2026, 03:42 UTC962 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

继续友情提醒下:iOS 又有安全更新了…iPhone 已经不如以往那样的“安全”,各种恶意利用在冒出… 不乱安装 App,不乱打开陌生网页(尤其涉黄的… 以前这种提醒主要都是针对 Windows 的,时代变了 关注频道 @ygf333 投稿 @XW77_BOT

11 Nov 2026, 03:32 UTC973 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

#群友爆料 泰国明星事件主人公 #辉煌钰 ,卷土重来 在金边做了两个车队 一个叫招财进宝 一个叫浪(浪是幕后 由名叫大弟(路线调度)负责对接 。 图片为强压绑架 在群里展示 ,目前金边治安严重受到质疑 ,大庭广众之下 既然三分钟绑架上车 ,其团伙游走于木牌 拜林波哥山 等地方。 图片上的群 都是辉煌钰做出来的 目的是为了更好的绑架中国人 ,据目前绑架一个中国人路费为 3000u左右 关注频道 @ygf333 投稿 @XW77_BOT

11 Nov 2026, 01:46 UTC≈1,120 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

西安一男子替境外电诈团伙取现100万元,银行柜台被警方当场抓获 近日,陕西西安雁塔区某银行网点发生一起涉电信网络诈骗案件。一名男子受境外电诈团伙雇佣,充当取现“车手”,企图到银行一次性提取100万元现金,最终被银行工作人员识别异常并报警,警方赶到现场将其控制,涉案资金全部被拦截。 据悉,嫌疑人赵某提前预约大额取现,办理业务时谎称资金是期货投资回款。然而,银行工作人员发现其无法合理说明资金来源,账户短时间内出现大额异常入账,随即启动反诈预警机制。 银行工作人员一边稳住赵某、暂缓办理取现业务,一边立即向反诈中心报警。民警接报后迅速赶到现场,将赵某当场抓获,原计划提取的100万元涉案资金未能成功转移。 经查,赵某长期受境外电诈团伙指使,先后流窜甘肃、湖南、江西等多个省份,通过异地办理银行卡、接收涉诈资金,再按照上线指令前往银行提取现金,从中赚取佣金,试图通过现金交易切断诈骗资金的追踪链条。 目前,案件仍在进一步侦办中,警方正…

10 Nov 2026, 20:00 UTC≈1,000 viewsread 11 November 2026
Video

#深夜吃瓜:金三角特区军营烧烤,一名中国男子喝多了闹事打人,喊打喊杀的,目前治安局已到达现场,枪都掏出来了! 特区乱不乱 中国人说了算…中国人的尿性大家都懂 喝了点马尿 地球🌏都是他说了算 关注频道 @ygf333 投稿 @XW77_BOT

10 Nov 2026, 15:26 UTC883 viewsread 10 November 2026
Photo

#网友曝光:本人亲身遭遇"代开会员"骗局,过程如下: 本来是想办理代开会员,结果付款之后,对方要求自己点链接提货(说平台要收0.1手续费)。当时我有点懵,也有点质疑,但最后还是做了点防备按对方指引操作了。 大致流程:付款之后,他们先让你打开网站——使用页面提示的指定钱包(全是冷钱包,估计就是专门为了盗钱做的铺垫)——会跳转到你选的冷钱包,生成订单。这时候会出现一个智能合约授权,授权之后再支付,之后钱包里的钱就被转走了。 具体过程有点长,这里只做概述。大家可以长长见识,遇到这样的千万别信。最后他们还会让你转一笔和被盗金额相同的钱。 视频里本来只是支付0.1,但上面通知栏弹出通知的时候,是把所有余额都划转了。幸好只是临时下载的测试钱包,要不然真要吃土了。我现在是无语又想笑,真是应了那句:明知山有虎,偏向虎山行——结果真被虎咬了 本次曝光只是为了提醒大家注意提防。凡是要求你先授权智能合约再付款的,一律不要操作。过程察觉不对劲…

10 Nov 2026, 15:00 UTC865 viewsread 10 November 2026
Photo

🤩🤩🤩🤩🧧🧧🧧🧧😄😁😁😁😁😁 🌟🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🔥 i8国际|豪礼天天领|福利天天享 🔥 🎁 每日签到|连续签到最高享 58U 🎰 电子日奖|每日投注最高享 18,888U 🌙 午夜回馈|专属时段最高享 8,888U 💎 神秘彩金|随机派送・1倍流水可提 👑 老客回归|专属豪礼最高 88,888U 🎉 迎新三重礼|首充・二充・三充层层加码|最高 8,888U ✨ 新客有礼|老客有奖|每日惊喜不断✨ 🎊 双十一狂欢盛典|11月11日—13日|限时3天 💰 每日投注送彩金|最高 59,999U 🧧每日存款满50即可参与|三波红包雨最高 8,888 ⏰ 红包时间(北京时间)|16:00 · 20:00 · 23:00 💎 💎 第二笔充值达标|最高奖励 19,998 🔥 三大活动同步开启|双十一福利限时放送!🔥 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 @i8kf 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 @i8pd 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 @i8i8 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 @i8win 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟…

Showing the 12 most recent of 738 posts we hold for @ygf333. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 3 posts on @ygf333 as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
17 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
18 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
14 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“全球大事件新闻” (@ygf333), 35,469 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ygf333.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.