Channel
@yesimtypology
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,069subscribers
+41 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1003916541123 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @yesimtypology |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 26 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/yesimtypology |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 13:18 | 2,069 | +26 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 09:11 | 2,043 | +13 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:02 | 2,030 | +2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:04 | 2,028 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (26 July 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 22,315 |
| Reactions total | 848 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 17:06 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
848 reactions across 20 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 6183589111836709791 | 427 | 50.4% | |
| 💘 | 177 | 20.9% | |
| 🤝 | 165 | 19.5% | |
| 💯 | 79 | 9.32% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 848reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
да, я 2л . . 🥹и мне интересны люди с психологической точки зрения, я очень стараюсь их понять, и при этом быть понятой ими. построение эмоциональных связей для меня очень приятный процесс, даже если эта связь строится в основном на негативных эмоциях. ＠ да, я .. типологии ꘓꘓ 𝖻𝗈𝗍 ♡゙
🤝38custom 618358911183670979126💘9💯1
да, я сп3 . . 🥹и мой главный страх - оказаться некомпетентной, слабой или обузой, поэтому я обязана быть безупречной и незаменимой функцией для своего окружения. я буду пахать втихую, решать все проблемы, вытаскивать их из огня и подстилать соломку везде, где только можно, чтобы никто и никогда не упрекнул меня в том, что я чего-то не вывожу. мне нужно быть для них железобетонной стеной и автономной единицей без един…
custom 618358911183670979116💘11🤝7💯1
да, я суггестивная чл . . 🥹и я всегда начинаю стрессовать, когда не понимаю, правильно ли у меня получилось или нет—мне всегда нужен человек которому я могу доверить свой процесс или результат, я начинаю требовать честного ответа, задавать вопросы что нужно делать, с чего начинать, какой план составлять, как это сделать, из чего оно делается, я в полном тупике. ＠ да, я .. типологии ꘓꘓ 𝖻𝗈𝗍 ♡゙
custom 61835891118367097919💘4
да, я сп6 . . 🥹и я специально ищу себе в друзей людей с проблемами, чтобы быть для них "добрым другом, который всегда примет и никогда не бросит", чтобы им было тяжело от меня уйти и я не остался один в отвратительном мире ＠ да, я .. типологии ꘓꘓ 𝖻𝗈𝗍 ♡゙
custom 618358911183670979120💘11💯6
да, я 1л . . 🥹и мне реально проще просто кинуть источник информации человеку вместо того чтоб самой разжёвывать всё ему.. "я же как-то поняла, прочти и ты поймёшь, что тебе ещё нужно?" ＠ да, я .. типологии ꘓꘓ 𝖻𝗈𝗍 ♡゙
custom 618358911183670979146💯11
да, я со4 с е7 в тритипе . . 🥹и мне трудно воспринимать самого себя всерьез. все мои негативные эмоции проходят через плато обесценивания, просто чтобы я мог раз за разом тянуться к людям, насколько сильно они бы меня не ранили. ＠ да, я .. типологии ꘓꘓ 𝖻𝗈𝗍 ♡゙
💘12custom 61835891118367097913💯2
да, я е4 . . 🥹и единственный рабочий по сути способ сблизитсья с кем-то для меня - через общие проблемы. ＠ да, я .. типологии ꘓꘓ 𝖻𝗈𝗍 ♡゙
💯21💘11custom 61835891118367097913
да, я сп6 . . 🥹и даже если человек сильно близок мне, я все равно не стану рассказывать про свое состояние, чувства и тому подобное. ＠ да, я .. типологии ꘓꘓ 𝖻𝗈𝗍 ♡゙
💘17custom 618358911183670979117🤝8
да, я сх2 . . 🥹и я полностью предана и отдана партнёру. для меня огромное значение в жизни занимают любовь и отношения. это то, во что я готова вкладывать все свои силы и не щадить энергию и силы полноценности. это единственный человек, которому я могу раскрыть все свои тайны и доверить внутренний мир... это то, что держит меня на плаву и дарит желанное ощущение. ＠ да, я .. типологии ꘓꘓ 𝖻𝗈𝗍 ♡゙
💘14custom 61835891118367097916💯4
да, я 4л . . 🥹и я верю тебе, если ты звучишь убедительно. ＠ да, я .. типологии ꘓꘓ 𝖻𝗈𝗍 ♡゙
💘18custom 618358911183670979110💯2
да, я 1ф4в . . 🥹и мне без разницы куда поступать, где работать, что делать по жизни и я не хочу об этом думать, хочу, что бы всё выбрали за меня, мне главное поменьше трудиться. ＠ да, я .. типологии ꘓꘓ 𝖻𝗈𝗍 ♡゙
custom 618358911183670979136💘3
да, я со9 . . 🥹и иногда мне очень сложно снять розовые очки и принять, что на деле все хуже, чем я думал изначально. ＠ да, я .. типологии ꘓꘓ 𝖻𝗈𝗍 ♡゙
🤝21custom 618358911183670979111💘6
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @yesimtypology. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 749,743 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“да я … типологии ♡゙” (@yesimtypology), 2,069 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yesimtypology.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.