#一意 #蘿蔔糕 #葵涌邨 #被撻訂 #請廣傳

Channel
本土經濟圈 - 米豬連盟
@yellowbuyredbluebye
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
3,672subscribers
-17 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001312774117 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @yellowbuyredbluebye |
| Created | 6 October 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/yellowbuyredbluebye |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 11:36 | 3,672 | -4 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 17:47 | 3,676 | -5 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 16:55 | 3,681 | -7 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:35 | 3,688 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:48 | 3,689 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:46 | 3,689 | first reading |
Engagement
8 posts held, back to 7 August 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 January 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
#轉載 【江湖救急 大家幫手清倉】 一四折平賣高級O2口罩,只求清貨,來貨價$549,現售$80,希望大家一齊幫手清倉! 寄賣地點:馬頭圍邨水仙樓海藥堂中醫診所 前土瓜灣區議員馬希鵬同黎廣偉於疫情初期口罩荒不惜高價入大量口罩,只求街坊人人有口罩用。點知冇得Claim政府錢之餘,到貨日仲被人一延再延,等到貨到時,口罩荒已退,最後變咗自掏銀包之餘,仲要囤倉。 到咗DQ潮,辦事處無埋,而貨呢,繼續積存。幸得海藥堂老闆幫忙存貨同寄賣,希望大家幫幫手,去海堂買兩盒O2口罩。兩位議員已不求回本,只求清倉,以免浪費。 於做區而言,兩位議員未必好識宣傳自己,我直頭當面批評過佢哋搞鼠患搞菜檔發力十足但傳唔入街坊隻耳。而口罩呢壇嘢,馬後炮啲講仲有啲傻仔。 但我諗,大家就係鍾意佢哋仍然願意做傻仔。呢個時代,喺得權之後,責任多咗,顧慮多咗,發聲難,秉持赤子之心發聲更難。無咩計算,無咩考慮自己得益,為街坊好,做咗先啦。 於我而言,猶記得,每…
#小編食評 #LokB #後生仔海南雞1998 #良心經濟圈 #本土經濟圈 #黃色經濟圈 #旺角 #食評_旺角 #食評_泰國菜 #MK_Thai_001 #旺角黃店 《投稿日期:2021年9月29日》 難得見後生仔海南雞1998唔使等位 終於試到佢個招牌無骨海南雞飯($55) 飯可以揀白飯或油飯 雞肉嫩滑得嚟啖啖肉 食得好滿足 飯量算多 油飯香口又唔會太油膩 下次要再試其他雞 —— 📍 店名:後生仔海南雞1998 ✉️ 地址:旺角通菜街2號鴻光大廈地下L號舖 🈺 營業時間: 星期一至六 12:00 - 21:00 星期日 全日休息 ——————————— 讀者投稿: @aaaa_00000 @a01982
#轉貼 #需要關注 #月餅 =============== #屯門 #水飯鏜
#投稿 #admin投稿 #告急 #極度需要關注 #月餅 ======================= #網店 #月難月愛 #月難月愛 月餅企劃係由 #新記冰室 嘅老細特登為手足開設, 目的係用作支援手足, 由於今次溝通上出現問題, 以為係仲有八百盒月餅, 點知係仲有800箱😳,即係二千四百盒😱😱😱, 因此大降價, 流心奶黃月餅 由原價$238/1盒 降至 🆘 $168/1盒🥮 每一盒🎁都會附送一張🖍文宣畫作嘅明信片, 一盒4⃣個裝,兩個印有「香」,另外兩個人有「港」字嘅🈷餅 🥮🆘🥮🆘🥮🆘🥮🆘🥮🆘 分銷點除咗有幫手大力推叫人買月餅嘅深水埗 #HongKong_in 之外, 向 #月難月愛 嗰邊查詢另外仲有其他分銷點 現貨 售賣 取餅 🥮🆘🥮🆘🥮🆘🥮🆘🥮🆘 以下係流心奶黃月餅現貨分銷點: 港島區💛 #銅鑼灣 - 糖街 8號 樂聲大廈 1樓 #鬼混 #VieWonWon #中環 - 機利文新街 20號 永康樓 地…
#小編食評 #LokB #綠色越南 #良心經濟圈 #本土經濟圈 #黃色經濟圈 #荃灣黃店 #荃灣 #黃越南菜 #食評_荃灣 #食評_越南菜 #TW_VN_001 《到訪日期:2021年8月4日》 生牛肉湯河($49) 湯底好味,有少少似腩汁,無味精 牛肉量好多 有好大片嘅牛肉片同好淋好大件嘅牛腩 兩大嚿蘿蔔都好甜好淋 配有辣椒、青檸、香葉可以自己落 香葉解油膩 加左青檸,肉味更鮮 價錢合理,好食,份量亦唔算少 小編推介💛💛 P.s. 舖頭係室外無冷氣 怕熱人士要小心熱親 —— 📍 店名:綠色越南 ✉️ 地址:荃灣昌寧商場地下28號舖(出面向街角落頭位) 🈺 營業時間: 星期一 休息 星期二至日 11:30 - 21:30 ——————————— 讀者投稿: @aaaa_00000 @a01982
#讀者投稿 #餓底手足投稿 #兩三碗餃子 #良心經濟圈 #本土經濟圈 #黃色經濟圈 #黃大仙 #慈雲山 #黃餃子店 #食評_廿黃大仙 #食評_餃子 #WTS_Dumpling_001 《投稿日期:2021年6月1日》 Credit: @goodnightfoodv3 我都唔係好識形容有幾大隻😂 我食咗6隻已經好飽,第8隻食到想嘔,抖咗陣先食得晒10隻 佢嘅湯底係用魚熬煮,冇落味精,而且唔腥,但因為飽得滯冇飲😂 🍮有手足fc埋 係愛啊哈利💛 P.s. 可以係自助區拎酸蘿蔔、菜脯同水! —— 📍 店名:兩三碗餃子 ️✉️ 地址:慈雲山華麗商場高層1號及5A號鋪 🈺 營業時間: 星期一至日 11:00-00:00 ————————————- 讀者投稿: @aaaa_00000 @a01982
#行路撚九龍新界版圖 今次係九龍新界版圖最後一擊,我地定左係821行,今次挑戰既路段最多上落斜。之前既路段大多係平路都要行十五個中,未知今次要行幾耐,目標籌到$20000。最近天氣亦都好唔穩定,就好似現今既情況,迷霧裡仍然要向前,那怕只是一小步,向住遠處既號角聲繼續前行。 自從第一次行完港島一圈之後,我哋立志要圍住香港行一圈。因為九龍新界條路線有啲長,所以今次係接住上次終點,係馬鞍山開始,行到去起點尖沙咀。 今次會有西牛、中仔、黃金魔法卡一齊出戰!。如果你地支持我地,只需要以行動撐612。今次目標係$20000 #純粹自發 #謝絕收款 Donate612 x 西牛 x 中仔 x 黃金魔法卡 「你捐612,我做行路撚」之九龍新界版圖 路線:馬鞍山-尖沙咀碼頭 全程40km 日期: 2021年8月21日 (六) 捐款詳情: 直接入數612基金 將捐款截圖send比 IG: @donate612 TG: 95055693 Signa…
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @yellowbuyredbluebye. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,379,935 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@yellowbuyredbluebye named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“本土經濟圈 - 米豬連盟” (@yellowbuyredbluebye), 3,672 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yellowbuyredbluebye.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.