这是ChatGPT给出的数据,按照这计算,目前的成本以及利润分配是合理的
Signed ug

Channel
@ye_wu
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,121subscribers
-11 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001992174280 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ye_wu |
| Created | Between 1 October 2023 and 30 April 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 30 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ye_wu |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Aug 2026, 16:34 | 1,121 | -4 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 09:56 | 1,125 | -1 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 11:22 | 1,126 | +2 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 16:08 | 1,124 | -2 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 07:14 | 1,126 | -5 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 05:03 | 1,131 | -3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 12:33 | 1,134 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:48 | 1,132 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:03 | 1,132 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 24 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 6 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (24 October 2025 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,690 |
| Reactions total | 5 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 23:48 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
35 reactions across 6 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 28 | 80.0% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 5.71% | |
| 🤓 | 2 | 5.71% | |
| 💩 | 1 | 2.86% | |
| 😭 | 1 | 2.86% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 2.86% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 35reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 24 October 2025 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
这是ChatGPT给出的数据,按照这计算,目前的成本以及利润分配是合理的
Signed ug
基本上来咨询的所有人,对百25的管道收益比例,没完整的概念 我给你们说明下 1、单粉在平台内的消费,时间越久消费越多 逻辑上,平台内容丰富+收费合理=单粉消费无上限 怎么也比传统卖粉挣的多 2、主播分成通常百50样子,通道一进一出要百8-10 3、平台运维费特别是流量费,你打开AI自己搜下,短视频直播平台消耗的流量费有多少,你直接搜日活1w,一个月要多少流量费加其他运维成本 记住是短视频+直播+发布作品 不是直播+作品发布 搜完ai对这些有点认识了,再算算工作室百25什么概念 短视频对于平台内容的丰富有很大作用,同时也是粉丝认识主播的一个无法替代的方式,也是主播展示自己无法替代的方式,但是这个流量消耗同样惊人 一个人一天刷短视频的时间,可能刷1h可能刷5h,这运维成本差异非常大 如果短视频的流量费太高,运营方式和利润分成比例都可能要调整,这些需要上线运行后,后台数据支撑再分析
Signed ug
后期会考虑把个人推广的收益增加到百20甚至更高 再把工作室的收益提高点,这个需要上线后一段时间的测试 这种暴力让利会让平台源源不断带来新客户 主流平台都是专业的主播的说实话没什么吸引力 从客户中挖掘培养素人主播是平台的运营方向 主流平台大部分的利润都自己拿了,也有相当部分的利润给到了那些打假粉的工作室 我这里的收益主播占大头,工作室其次,平台维护费用再其次,通道占比最小 让利、纯色、不杀,不赌、无广告、高质量、内容多样性、性价比,形成一个完整的运营闭环 不保证能成功,大家拭目以待
Signed ug
随着app的客户增加,内容也会丰富起来 每个人都可以开播,发作品,后期的主播基本都会来客户本身 平台会给漂亮的优质的内容推流,扶持一批优质主播来增加粉的消费 平台下载不需要任何权限,注册也只有账号密码 充值采用贴码,每天几千个二维码来保障充值的隐私安全 以客户的视角来看 平台首先满足了客户对于“色”的需求 基于这点,再满足客户安全、隐私的需求 最后再满足客户对于内容高质量的需求,同时价格低廉 后期再推出真实的空降和包养(会收取合作方的押金来保障客户的安全隐私问题) 多管齐下,区别于市场上的所有台子 做一个长久的,纯粹的色播平台
Signed ug
管道收益指的是粉在app里面的所有消费你都会有收益 粉在里面消费1年,3年,你也有收益 这种app跟工作室深度绑定的模式对于我们来说杜绝了假粉,对于工作室来说收益更高,也更持久 很多人会考虑前期工作室成本问题,存活问题 这些我都有帮你们考虑好了 具体的有打粉经验的来咨询我 而且打粉的前期投入其实没多少 按照市场数据推算 单粉的月消费在50-500,平均在150-300区间比较多 那么半年消费 一年消费你都有提成 我们会把重心放在做好内容上,放在客户投诉上,来增加客户的粘性和复购率
❤5
Signed ug
程序还在写,十几人的精英团队操刀 每个人都可以当up,每个人都可以在上面赚钱消费 工作室25%永久管道收益 个人拉新15%永久管道收益 主播45%-55%收益分成 页面,机制,算法,完美复刻抖音快手 百分百自写代码 招: 打粉工作室(永久管道收益)、素人主播(平台签约,流量扶持)、贴码团队(纯色小额)
Signed ug
U聚业务@ye_wu pinned «我又准备做色播了,这次准备充足 纯色,不杀,不赌,无广告,走长期路线 app模板按照抖音快手复刻,可发作品可直播 预计再有10-20天写好第一版程序,再用一礼拜调试 需要以下资源: 1、打粉工作室(永久管道收益模式,杜绝假粉,一定是自己的一手工作室) 2、前期的签约主播(随便什么人长的还可以的就行,不分什么专业不专业) 3、贴码车队(微信支付宝都是小额的几十块,正常不超过500单笔,需要直押) 4、如果有资方或者其他优势资源方可以谈入股,当然一定是跟我的理念相符的 5、没人能保证项目百分百能运营成功,合…»
我又准备做色播了,这次准备充足 纯色,不杀,不赌,无广告,走长期路线 app模板按照抖音快手复刻,可发作品可直播 预计再有10-20天写好第一版程序,再用一礼拜调试 需要以下资源: 1、打粉工作室(永久管道收益模式,杜绝假粉,一定是自己的一手工作室) 2、前期的签约主播(随便什么人长的还可以的就行,不分什么专业不专业) 3、贴码车队(微信支付宝都是小额的几十块,正常不超过500单笔,需要直押) 4、如果有资方或者其他优势资源方可以谈入股,当然一定是跟我的理念相符的 5、没人能保证项目百分百能运营成功,合作需谨慎,每个合作伙伴我都会详细讲解运营思路,目前市场没有跟我模板一样的,自行判断
❤3👍2
Signed ug
1
Signed ug
1
Signed ug
菠菜im,不限量,发了就算
❤3😭1
Signed ug 收苹果im
1
❤2💩1🥰1
Signed ug
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @ye_wu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 685,180 of 1,627,445entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“U聚业务@ye_wu” (@ye_wu), 1,121 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ye_wu.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.