Channel
@ydwh31
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,320subscribers
+143 since we began measuring on 16 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1003975618025 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ydwh31 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 4 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 16 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ydwh31 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Sept 2026, 19:15 | 1,320 | +35 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 01:05 | 1,285 | +21 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 16:04 | 1,264 | +15 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 00:28 | 1,249 | +14 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 22:58 | 1,235 | +25 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 04:22 | 1,210 | +18 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 11:08 | 1,192 | +15 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 15:15 | 1,177 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 15 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (4 August 2026 – 16 August 2026) |
| Views total | 12,461 |
| Reactions total | 5 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 16 Aug 2026, 15:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
6 reactions across 5 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 6 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 16 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
【联系方式】: @xhj381 【老师艺名】：小思涵 【所在位置】： 青秀区 【验证留名】：lodge 【验证时间】：8.16 【课程价格】：600p 【推荐程度】：8.5 【体验细节】：冲着老师的好评来的，果然没让我失望，小思涵老师五官很精致，无科技的那种，淡淡的妆容，很好看，皮肤光滑细嫩，摸着很舒服。付水冲洗，对鸡鸡洗得很仔细。服务很认真，配合度也高，女友感十足，真的很嫩，让我有种老牛吃嫩草的感觉，不催钟，口得也很舒服，老师的下面是真嫩，非常紧，包裹感很好，个人感觉软点的都进不去，差点把持不住交代了，还好老师懂事，换女上，抱着老师酥胸插入进出，感觉跟女朋友做爱一样，最后换了后入出货了。在南宁好久没有碰到如此合心意的老师了，必须写上好评给予支持~
有空位哦 宝宝们🥰🥰
开课啦 宝宝们🥰🥰
【老师艺名】：小思涵 【联系方式】： @xhj381 【验证留名】：daohhd 【验证时间】：2026.8.14 【课程价格】：600p 【颜值身材】：身材好，颜值亮 【服务内容】：课表有的基本都完成 【服务态度】：不错 可以 【优点缺点】：看了很久还是决定cj小思涵老师，约了课后立马出发，到了后停车也非常方便，遥控上楼后见到老师非常性感可爱 ，思涵帮我把鸡鸡冲的很干净，然后我自己擦干上床，床上直接调情然后口，硬了之后戴套老师躺下，轮到我来撩老师了，老师很怕痒，然后桩了大概10多分钟，老师反馈很真实，胸很大很软，结束之后我自己冲凉再聊了一会天就走啦，老师是个宝藏老师，洗澡服务后立马开干，边做边🐍中途还和老师玩点小情趣，老师十分耐心，也很配合，像这么小年龄的老师什么都配合已经很少了，过程超级爽，值得二反。
开课了哟 宝宝们😜😜
【验证留名】：rdg 【验证时间】：8.13 【妹子花名】:小思涵 【联系方式】：【点击】南宁师范聊天群 【所在位置】：青秀区 【修车水费】：600 【身高身材】：165 【颜值相似】：9 【凶器罩杯】：B+ 【服务内容】：课表 【服务详情】：老师一对雪白的大奶让我爱不释手，口活儿真是一流，老师舔完咪咪舔旦旦，舔完旦旦舔弟弟，小舌头在🐢头上打转转，包裹着阴茎左右旋转吹，把我舔得欲罢不能，趁火候到了戴T开始干活，趴在老师的身上一对大奶顶住我的胸，我温柔的抽插着，淫叫声从老师嘴里断断续续的发出，换个姿势，后入时无敌大屁股对着我，提枪进洞，老师汁水直流，我越干越兴奋，坚持了几分钟后释放了出来，休息了一下，老师给我做了课本上的服务，选了战袍穿上老师更性感诱人了，老师用她那三寸不烂之舌把我口到飘飘欲仙，提枪上阵干到大汗淋漓才结束战斗，完事后老师耐心的给我擦拭，还夸我好厉害，感觉很有成就感！非常愉快的一次出击，特别推荐！ 【机车行为】：无
❤2
开课啦 宝宝们🥰
❤1
验证留名：木木 上课时间：8.12 老师花名：小思涵 上课花费：pp12 颜值身材：五官精致，细腰翘臀 服务内容：课表 出击体验：和老师是在酒店相约 老师到酒店后 开门见到老师，人照一致，态度也很好，很有女友感，身材棒棒的，洗干净躺床上让老师服务了，口技不错，没有一点齿感，包裹感也十足。口了好几分钟后一转攻势，粉嫩水多，一边的老师也很卖力的口着。玩了一会提枪上阵，就先女上由慢到快，逼逼紧致，润。包裹感很好，看老师来感觉了，换了个从日本小电影学到的姿势，老师侧躺着进入，包裹感又上了一个层次，继续捣鼓几分钟就忍不住发射了。 优点缺点：情绪价值拉满，逼紧水多，动作配合
开课咯 宝宝们🥰🥰
宝宝们 睡醒啦 😝可以提前约课了哦🥰
❤1
开课啦 宝宝们🥰快来一起钻被窝呀😝
❤1
【验证留名】：Wff 【验证时间】：8.10 【妹子艺名】：小思涵 【所在位置】：青秀区 【上课挥霍】：600 【服务项目】：洗吹做🐍 【颜值相似】：8 【推荐指数】：⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️(5星满分） 【服务体验】：原来只是想着试一试，在群里面无意的聊着、筛选着，然后就看着这个了，感觉离我比较近，就考虑先试一试。毕竟之前踩过的坑太多了，就不想再试新的。然后看到他群里面有一些，有个照片，突然很有以前女朋友的感觉，就决定去了，加上又近。去之前还是特别忐忑后，提前跟思涵沟通好具体时间。然后思涵也没有跟其他的人一样，那么机车扭扭捏捏的，说定了就定了，很干脆。就很有信任感。进门的话一直很干脆，然后干脆的洗洗漱漱，就特别舒服，一点都不机车，就跟跟自己的以前的女朋友一样。自由的感觉，不像以前遇到那种，然后非要自己主动，然后什么都要自己来。就跟自己在上班一样，自己卖苦力。非常感谢思涵妹妹，我有一种跟以前谈恋爱的感觉。虽然心里不是特别想，但还是要…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ydwh31. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“小思涵（个人自聊） つ😘つ” (@ydwh31), 1,320 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ydwh31.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.