自动投注要恢复公益吗
❤11👍5🌭3👎1🖕1
Signed 明宝

Channel
@ycjndq
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
10,743subscribers
-30 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1003322164349 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ycjndq |
| Created | Between 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ycjndq |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 12:38 | 10,743 | -25 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 15:53 | 10,768 | +5 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 17:24 | 10,763 | +6 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 20:26 | 10,757 | -23 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 22:11 | 10,780 | +12 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 19:07 | 10,768 | -5 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:15 | 10,773 | first reading |
24 posts held, back to 30 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 24 (30 June 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 28,310 |
| Reactions total | 236 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 04:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
290 reactions across 23 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 155 | 53.4% | |
| 👎 | 38 | 13.1% | |
| 👍 | 25 | 8.62% | |
| 🖕 | 19 | 6.55% | |
| 💩 | 16 | 5.52% | |
| 🙏 | 11 | 3.79% | |
| 🤡 | 7 | 2.41% | |
| 🤣 | 5 | 1.72% | |
| 🤮 | 5 | 1.72% | |
| 🌭 | 3 | 1.03% | |
| 🤷♀ | 2 | 0.69% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 0.345% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 0.345% | |
| 😘 | 1 | 0.345% | |
| 🥱 | 1 | 0.345% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 290reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 30 June 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ycjndq. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 24 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 June 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
自动投注要恢复公益吗
❤11👍5🌭3👎1🖕1
Signed 明宝
随机抽取6位: 1. @pxssr 2. @qiufeng8a 3. @mlycnb66 4. @Aantt000 5. @Stacy_Anderson7715 6. @grtdv88
Signed 明宝
在这个评论抽6瓶红牛用豆包来抽 8:35停
❤9
Signed 明宝
骗子通过p图来说你账号有诈骗标签其实是没有的 然后叫你去申诉 那个机器人是盗号的 大家注意点
❤9
Signed 明宝
现在可以自己手动在群里的禁言了! 用法: 1. 私聊机器人发送 解除禁言 → 解除您本人在群组中的禁言 示例: 解除禁言 解除禁言机器人: @bljcjybot
👍5🖕2❤1
Signed 明宝
https://t.me/pcyx?start=BM6599621896 真实有效! 点击链接即可参与
❤3
Signed 明宝
秋天的第1天能不能来个0或者27
👎30❤5💩4🤮3
Signed 明宝
牛子币机器人 @nznzbbot 24小时内随机发放牛子币 (通过发言抽取) 10个牛子币可兑换 8.8c 后续会增加更多牛子币兑换的项目 👤 可用命令(私聊或指定群): 查询(或“我的牛子币”) - 查看你总共拥有的牛子币数量 兑换 - 获取兑换联系管理员的方式 排行榜 - 查看牛子币总余额排行 帮助 - 显示本帮助信息
❤5
Signed 明宝
😀世博钱包火热上线 😀 针对钱包会员每月发放888万福利 当月单个用户最高盈利1.5亿美金(全网公开可查,绝无虚假) 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 全网高赔率游戏 · 实时余额共享 ✅转账秒到账 · 0手续费 ✅ 余额宝年化收益 8.88% 每日结算(全网最高利息) ✅ 支持多种玩法 随时提现 ✅ 游戏赔率全网领先 世博集团10亿美元备用金护航,诚邀您前来体验。 我司以公平公正为原则,若以上广告不实或我司经营私彩,举报者奖励500万美金。 欢迎各位老板进场体验 🔵世博钱包:@SBQB 🔵游戏中心:@SB28
❤2💩1🥱1
Signed 明宝
kkpay哈希 开奖api 最近 500 条 https://api.jnd.中国/api/history?limit=500 最新一期 https://api.jnd.中国/api/latest 遗漏api https://yl.jnd.中国/api/mbnb
❤2
Signed 明宝
双向tg号.txt
❤9💩7🤣5
Signed 明宝
为了展示红包封面的帅气,评论区抽3个18.8c Ai开奖公平公正
❤45🙏11👍10🤡7🖕6🤷♀2💯1🤮1
Signed 巴黎
Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @ycjndq. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 500,883 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“巴黎世家数据公开频道” (@ycjndq), 10,743 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ycjndq.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.