Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ya'subiy

@yasubiy

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

4,023subscribers

-25 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001895371786
TypeChannel
Username@yasubiy
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/yasubiy

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 89% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

4,0234,0484,035.58 August 2026 — 4,048 subscribers8 August 2026 — 4,048 subscribers11 August 2026 — 4,032 subscribers15 August 2026 — 4,023 subscribers8 August 202615 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -25. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,019–4,052 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 03:184,023-9
11 Aug 2026, 13:344,032-16
8 Aug 2026, 03:584,048no change
8 Aug 2026, 01:324,048first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 27 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
117.8%
avg views ÷ 4,023 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,740
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 10 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 August 2026
Posts held19 (27 June 20261 August 2026)
Views total47,380
Reactions total0
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 01:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 04s
Average length
37s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
110
across the posts below
Posts paid on
15
of 19 we hold a reading for · 79%
Most on one post
56
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @yasubiy. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 June 2026 to 1 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

30 Jul 2026, 12:56 UTC≈5,000 viewsread 8 August 2026
Video

ҳай сиқилма, август ҳам келиб қолди.

26 Jul 2026, 18:17 UTC≈4,050 views0 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

У тебя новое анонимное сообщение! Qanchalik erkinlik berilishi kerak ayol kishiga turmushga chiqqanidan song ғалати савол бўлди. менимча, “аёлга қанча эркинлик бериш керак?” деган саволнинг ўзи тўғри эмас. чунки эркинлик эр берадиган ёки тортиб оладиган нарса эмас, инсоннинг ҳаққидир. лекин буни “турмуш қургач, хоҳлаганимни қиламан, ҳеч ким аралашмайди” деб тушуниш ҳам нотўғри. чунки никоҳ фақат ҳуқуқ эмас, масъул

24 Jul 2026, 17:44 UTC≈3,960 views0 reactions3 Starsread 8 August 2026

У тебя новое анонимное сообщение! Tayyorman db o'ylaganmisz hech bitta oilani boshqara olaman deb манимча одам ўзига “мен 100% тайёрман” деб кафолат бериши қийин, чунки оила бошқариш китобдан ўрганиладиган эмас, жараёнда сабр, тажриба ва масъулият билан шаклланади. лекин оила қуриш учун инсонда асосийси масъулиятни зиммасига олишга тайёрлик бўлиши керак. Аллоҳга таваккал қилиб айта оламанки, ҳам руҳан, ҳам молияв

16 Jul 2026, 18:47 UTC≈6,460 views0 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Voice message

pov : elle te demande si elle est belle mais elle ressemble à cette chanson

14 Jul 2026, 18:48 UTC≈7,040 views0 reactions5 Starsread 8 August 2026

Посмотри на себя. Как много ты работал. Уставший, в стрессе, и борешься со своими внутренними битвами, о которых никто не знает. И несмотря ни на что, ты продолжаешь появляться каждый день. Вот хорошая новость: хорошие времена уже на пути к тебе. Я горжусь тобой…

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @yasubiy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 301,410 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ya'subiy” (@yasubiy), 4,023 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yasubiy.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.