Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ๐Ÿ‡พ ๐Ÿ‡ฆ ๐Ÿ‡ธ ๐Ÿ‡ฒ ๐Ÿ‡ฎ ๐Ÿ‡ณ ๐Ÿ•Š

Channel

๐Ÿ‡พ ๐Ÿ‡ฆ ๐Ÿ‡ธ ๐Ÿ‡ฒ ๐Ÿ‡ฎ ๐Ÿ‡ณ ๐Ÿ•Š

@yasminka955

On this record: Growth ยท Engagement ยท What this channel posts ยท Reactions ยท Stars ยท Posts ยท Citations ยท Telegram's recommendations ยท Cite this entry

3,648subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 15 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 3,162โ€“10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001675973150
TypeChannel
Username@yasminka955
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023โ€” estimated from Telegramโ€™s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded15 August 2026
Last confirmed live26 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 26 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/yasminka955

Growth

3,6483,6513,649.515 August 2026 โ€” 3,651 subscribers16 August 2026 โ€” 3,648 subscribers20 August 2026 โ€” 3,649 subscribers26 August 2026 โ€” 3,648 subscribers15 August 202626 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 11 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โ€œno change observedโ€, never โ€œinterpolatedโ€. The vertical axis spans 3,648โ€“3,651 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Aug 2026, 13:033,648-1
20 Aug 2026, 03:243,649+1
16 Aug 2026, 17:233,648-3
15 Aug 2026, 03:153,651first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 โ€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโ€™s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramโ€™s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR ยท 30 days
15.1%
avg views รท 3,648 subscribers
Avg views / post
551
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.06%
reactions รท views ยท ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท viewsโ€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโ€™s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held20 (6 August 2026 โ€“ 14 August 2026)
Views total11,023
Reactions total558
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface โ€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 03:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โ€œcorrectingโ€ the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ€” 8.12K, 3.7M โ€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
12m 27s
Average length
53s

Measured directly from 14 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel โ€” not this channelโ€™s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramโ€™s own rounded chrome, so it carries no โ‰ˆ mark.

Reaction mix

558 reactions across 20 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
โค24844.4%
๐Ÿ”ฅ9717.4%
๐Ÿ‘7513.4%
๐Ÿ˜5710.2%
๐Ÿคฃ234.12%
๐Ÿ’ฏ213.76%
๐Ÿคฉ193.41%
๐Ÿ’”71.25%
๐Ÿฅฐ71.25%
๐Ÿ˜ข40.717%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ€” ๐Ÿ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ€” 4.34K, 1.2M โ€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโ€™s own count on each post โ€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ€” those same posts carry 558reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โ€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ€.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for ยท 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars โ€” bought with money โ€” on a post by @yasminka955. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 August 2026 to 14 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegramโ€™s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

14 Aug 2026, 18:46 UTC161 views9 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

)))

๐Ÿ˜9

Signed ๐’ด๐’ถ๐“ˆ๐“‚๐’พ๐“ƒ โ„ฌ๐’ถ๐“‰๐’ถ๐“โ„ด๐“‹๐’ถ

14 Aug 2026, 05:47 UTC306 views21 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ’ฏ

๐Ÿ”ฅ17๐Ÿ‘4

Signed ๐’ด๐’ถ๐“ˆ๐“‚๐’พ๐“ƒ โ„ฌ๐’ถ๐“‰๐’ถ๐“โ„ด๐“‹๐’ถ

13 Aug 2026, 20:39 UTC371 views32 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

ะขะพั‡ะฝะพ ะตัั‚ัŒ๐Ÿ˜‚

๐Ÿ˜20๐Ÿ’ฏ11โค1

Signed ๐’ด๐’ถ๐“ˆ๐“‚๐’พ๐“ƒ โ„ฌ๐’ถ๐“‰๐’ถ๐“โ„ด๐“‹๐’ถ

13 Aug 2026, 15:13 UTC403 views22 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

ะœะพั โ™พ๏ธ

โค19๐Ÿ”ฅ3

Signed ๐’ด๐’ถ๐“ˆ๐“‚๐’พ๐“ƒ โ„ฌ๐’ถ๐“‰๐’ถ๐“โ„ด๐“‹๐’ถ

13 Aug 2026, 15:08 UTC393 views21 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

ะœะฐะปะพ ั‡ะตะปะพะฒะตะบะฐ ะปัŽะฑะธั‚ัŒ, ะฝะฐะดะพ ะตะณะพ ะฟะพะฝัั‚ัŒ, ะฝะฐะดะพ ะตะณะพ ะถะธะทะฝัŒัŽ ะถะธั‚ัŒ, ะฒะผะตัั‚ะต ั ะฝะธะผ ะดั‹ัˆะฐั‚ัŒ. ะกะปั‹ัˆะฐั‚ัŒ ะฟะพั€ะพัŽ ั‚ะพ, ั‡ั‚ะพ ะฝะตะปัŒะทั ัะบะฐะทะฐั‚ัŒ. ะœะฐะปะพ - ะตะณะพ ะฝะฐะนั‚ะธ, ะณะปะฐะฒะฝะพะต - ะฝะต ะฟะพั‚ะตั€ัั‚ัŒ!!! ๐Ÿ’ž

โค17๐Ÿ”ฅ4

Signed ๐’ด๐’ถ๐“ˆ๐“‚๐’พ๐“ƒ โ„ฌ๐’ถ๐“‰๐’ถ๐“โ„ด๐“‹๐’ถ

13 Aug 2026, 11:00 UTC414 views27 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚

๐Ÿคฃ18๐Ÿ˜5โค4

Signed ๐’ด๐’ถ๐“ˆ๐“‚๐’พ๐“ƒ โ„ฌ๐’ถ๐“‰๐’ถ๐“โ„ด๐“‹๐’ถ

13 Aug 2026, 08:29 UTC417 views23 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

๐Ÿ‘16๐Ÿ”ฅ6โค1

Signed ๐’ด๐’ถ๐“ˆ๐“‚๐’พ๐“ƒ โ„ฌ๐’ถ๐“‰๐’ถ๐“โ„ด๐“‹๐’ถ

12 Aug 2026, 15:29 UTC490 views31 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

ะฏ ะฟั€ะพัั‚ะพ ะถะตะฝั‰ะธะฝะฐ)๐Ÿฅฐ

โค22๐Ÿ‘9

Signed ๐’ด๐’ถ๐“ˆ๐“‚๐’พ๐“ƒ โ„ฌ๐’ถ๐“‰๐’ถ๐“โ„ด๐“‹๐’ถ

12 Aug 2026, 15:21 UTC479 views4 reactionsread 15 August 2026

https://vt.tiktok.com/ZS4KkqRTM ะ”ัƒัˆะตะฒะฝะฐั ะฟะตัะฝัโ™ฅ๏ธ

โค4

Signed ๐’ด๐’ถ๐“ˆ๐“‚๐’พ๐“ƒ โ„ฌ๐’ถ๐“‰๐’ถ๐“โ„ด๐“‹๐’ถ

12 Aug 2026, 13:17 UTC497 views21 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

ะกะตั€ะดั†ะต ั‡ัƒะฒัั‚ะฒัƒะตั‚ ั€ะพะดะฝะพะต๐Ÿฅฐโ™ฅ๏ธ

โค21

Signed ๐’ด๐’ถ๐“ˆ๐“‚๐’พ๐“ƒ โ„ฌ๐’ถ๐“‰๐’ถ๐“โ„ด๐“‹๐’ถ

12 Aug 2026, 06:13 UTC529 views41 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

โ™ฅ๏ธ

โค35๐Ÿ‘6

Signed ๐’ด๐’ถ๐“ˆ๐“‚๐’พ๐“ƒ โ„ฌ๐’ถ๐“‰๐’ถ๐“โ„ด๐“‹๐’ถ

10 Aug 2026, 18:34 UTC621 views41 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚

๐Ÿ˜23๐Ÿ”ฅ7๐Ÿ’ฏ5๐Ÿคฃ5๐Ÿ‘1

Signed ๐’ด๐’ถ๐“ˆ๐“‚๐’พ๐“ƒ โ„ฌ๐’ถ๐“‰๐’ถ๐“โ„ด๐“‹๐’ถ

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @yasminka955. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank โ€” 1,396,567 of 1,621,120entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below โ€” republished posts weigh more than named mentions โ€” and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelโ€™s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page โ€” a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel โ€” every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ€” that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโ€™s namer to yesterdayโ€™s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ€” the โ€œNamed by N registered channelsโ€ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegramโ€™s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly โ€” each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseโ€™s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ะŸัะธั…ะพะปะพะณะธั ะถะธะทะฝะธ ะธ ั„ะธะปะพัะพั„ะธั
@psy_citat ยท 58,275
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 60 here โ€” alongside 59 others โ€” read 22 August 2026
ะžะผะฐั€ ะฅะฐะนัะผ ะธ ะดั€ัƒะณะธะต ะฒะตะปะธะบะธะต ั„ะธะปะพัะพั„ั‹
@psysoul_info ยท 81,322
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 55 here โ€” alongside 54 others โ€” read 18 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegramโ€™s list for THAT channel, not this one โ€” see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 August 2026 โ€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

โ€œ๐Ÿ‡พ ๐Ÿ‡ฆ ๐Ÿ‡ธ ๐Ÿ‡ฒ ๐Ÿ‡ฎ ๐Ÿ‡ณ ๐Ÿ•Šโ€ (@yasminka955), 3,648 subscribers as measured 26 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yasminka955.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.