3 measurements spanning 4 days, net -9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,931–3,942 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Aug 2026, 10:12
3,932
-5
8 Aug 2026, 11:07
3,937
-4
7 Aug 2026, 13:18
3,941
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 16 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
11.4%
avg views ÷ 3,932 subscribers
Avg views / post
450
1 post measured
Reaction rate
2.22%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 July 2026
Posts held
20 (16 March 2026 – 30 July 2026)
Views total
450
Reactions total
10
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 05:48 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
13s
Average length
13s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
208 reactions across 20 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
😁
110
52.9%
❤
59
28.4%
👍
13
6.25%
👏
11
5.29%
🤯
9
4.33%
🔥
5
2.40%
😱
1
0.481%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 208reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 March 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Давно не было листингов, сегодня на отработке GRVT
Листинг пройдет на Binance Alpha 13:00 UTC, ByBit, OKX, KuCoin, 14:00 UTC
ETH - 0xAD29F2723fcdBcF665F210F25E06f97477e417cF
BSC - 0x46F2564E0FA8248d15125E7e54173cfbdEf91Be7
Бридж : https://portalbridge.com/?fromChain=Ethereum&fromToken=GRVT&toChain=Bsc&toToken=GRVT
Помните Grass? Он еще жив
Проверьте, отображаются ли у вас очки (если нет, то вас побрили перед раздачей дропа за второй сезон). Если есть, то все отлично.
Как ни странно, почти все уже забыли об этом проекте и остановили фарм, так как проект запускает множество новых эпох, но в последнее время начали активизировать соцсети, поэтому рекомендую следить
Разлок на 100млрд$ заказывали?
10,8% SPCX или 95 млрд$ пойдет в рынок 5 августа. Префом шортить я бы не стал это та же история что с LAB когда команда держит фул саплай и может качать график куда угодно
https://tokenomist.ai/stock/spcx
То есть ранние инвесторы пойдут на выход через месяц-полтора. И выходить будут об ритейл и об те самые фонды, которых только что силой загнали в акцию
Санкционный бан для HTX
Великобритания подозревает, что Huobi Global S.A. предоставлял финансовые услуги двум субъектам. CEX начали блокировать депозиты с HTX
Если держите деньги на бирже - выводите через web3-кошельки и миксеры
Откручиваем ваши акки MEXC с -пнл 🦫
Закидываем страховой депозит (от 50$) и свой Web Id , выставляем свои фильтры под открут и запускаем , к вашему аккаунту доступа нету и на аккаунте сидите только вы
Можно ставить сразу много аккаунтов слотов хватает , также у ребят лучший процент на рынке и отличный траст у девов ,также саппорт по всем вопросом в боте работает 24/7
Ваш процент - 45%
Промокод для доступа к боту…
КАК ФЛИПАТЬ 0фис биток + получить 0фис на акк
МОЯ СТРАТЕГИЯ НА ГРАФИКЕ, ОТКРЫТИЕ И ЗАКРЫТИЕ ПОЗИЦИЙ
Перейдем к самому интересному, как я флипую:
Депозит на аккаунт 250-300$$
График секундный, это очень важно, потому что трейды у нас и есть секундные, на минутном графике очень плохое понимание графика
Включаю плечо 200-500х(какое дадут) , почему сразу так много (НО нюанс: если ты этого еще никогда не флипал, ты долже…
Потестил этого бота для Hyperliquid и реально зашло
Из того, что прям зашло:
— не нужно подключать API или давать доступ к кошу
— просто вставляешь адрес и сразу видишь все свои позиции
— удобно трекается pnl и риски
— есть алерты, если позиция начинает лететь куда-то не туда
— всё это прямо в телеге, без постоянного сидения в Hyperliquid
Что особенно понравилось - это уведомления. Когда не за компом, бот реально п…
Сегодня нашел новую фичу для трейдеров на Hyperliquid
Большинство времени ты должен сидеть за рабочим местом и трекать свою позу, а все эти “аналитики/трекеры” - либо кривые, либо с подпиской, либо еще и доступ к кошу просят
Так вот сейчас юзаю RiskOff Bot это бот, который просто подключаешь по адресу коша и он:
— показывает все позиции
— отслеживает pnl
— кидает алерты если что-то летит в ликвидацию
— + даёт норм …
Карта ByBit уже доступна в Apple Pay
+10$ новым рефералам за транзакции на сумму 100$ — https://www.bybit.com/cards/?ref=2AJNEJ&source=applet_invite
У них базово действует кешбэк 2% + курс лучше чем на других крипто картах
❤8😁3👏1🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @yariketh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,219,257 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
DropCryptoZona💵💪 @DropKriptozona · 113,935 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 14 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ярик.eth” (@yariketh), 3,932 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yariketh.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.