Channel
@yanyanbaogaolanmu
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
3subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 3 November 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003909414290 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @yanyanbaogaolanmu |
| Created | 8 June 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 3 November 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 3 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/yanyanbaogaolanmu |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Nov 2026, 07:22 | 3 | no change |
| 3 Nov 2026, 06:49 | 3 | first reading |
3 posts held, back to 8 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 3 (8 June 2026 – 1 November 2026) |
| Views total | 215 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Nov 2026, 07:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 3 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 2 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
【客服榜报告模版】 ❤萝卜青菜各有所爱，出击感受仅代表个人喜好以及观点，请各位自行斟酌考量❗ 【出击日期】：11月1号 【出击人ID】：和超过20岁的少女上床就会死掉 【老师艺名】：妍妍 【客服账号】：@fujianjingpin 【城市地区】：厦门 【茶费次数】：7 【目测年龄】：18 【人照相似】：（满分90） 【本人颜值】：（满分90） 【身材曲线】：（满分90） 【目测胸围】：b 【肤色质感】：正常 【bb紧致度】：紧 【课表满足】： 【情绪价值】：（满分90） 【日☀后评语】：妹妹人比照片要瘦一点，身材瘦小型的，主动询问要不要69，口的还可以，69完要漱口不然会抗拒舌吻，下面还蛮紧的，可以感觉确实没怎么做，舌吻也比较投入，不错的妹子 【总体评分】：（满分90） 【推荐指数】：（最高7颗⭐） 【客服榜】 t.me/fujianbaogaochaxun
【客服榜报告模版】 ❤萝卜青菜各有所爱，出击感受仅代表个人喜好以及观点，请各位自行斟酌考量❗ 【出击日期】：11.01 【出击人ID】：荒野大镖客 【老师艺名】：妍妍 【客服账号】：@fujianjingpin 【城市地区】：厦门 【茶费次数】：7p 【目测年龄】：19-20 【人照相似】：90（满分100） 【本人颜值】：90（满分100） 【身材曲线】：90（满分100） 【目测胸围】：B 【肤色质感】：小麦 【bb紧致度】：紧、润 【课表满足】：90 【情绪价值】：90（满分100） 【日☀后评语】：今日见泡面上新了一个妹子，便约上，路上有点堵，迟到了几分钟，见到妹子，感觉还可以，就付米，自助洗，随后妹子洗，出来的时候看奶子颜色虽然不够粉，但是坚挺，乳晕包裹的奶头小小的，忍不住直接上手了，妹子可🐍可69，妹子有点烟嗓，🐍的话我小🐍了一下感觉稍微有点烟味就没再🐍了，69的话最近不太感冒，但是还是让妹子转过来好生欣赏了…
Channel created
Showing the 3 most recent of 3 posts we hold for @yanyanbaogaolanmu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“妍妍 报告栏” (@yanyanbaogaolanmu), 3 subscribers as measured 3 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yanyanbaogaolanmu.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.