Channel
@yangjour
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
50subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002612757908 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @yangjour |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/yangjour |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 16:58 | 50 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 11:01 | 51 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:38 | 51 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 4 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
69 reactions across 6 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5264970975308460201 | 14 | 20.3% | |
| custom 5271984536643720182 | 14 | 20.3% | |
| custom 5238236358669013651 | 12 | 17.4% | |
| 💘 | 8 | 11.6% | |
| 👾 | 5 | 7.25% | |
| 👀 | 4 | 5.80% | |
| custom 5265163969663897084 | 3 | 4.35% | |
| 🦄 | 3 | 4.35% | |
| custom 5467804417929547677 | 2 | 2.90% | |
| custom 5235487785758003824 | 1 | 1.45% | |
| custom 5235730855137155191 | 1 | 1.45% | |
| custom 5467816478197715551 | 1 | 1.45% | |
| 🍓 | 1 | 1.45% |
Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 69reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 4 May 2026 to 11 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @yangjour. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 May 2026 to 11 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
𝅄 ࣳ . ׄ ℐ𝒐𝒖𝒓𝒏𝒂𝒍𝒊𝒔𝒕 ẞ𝓲𝓷𝓲 ֶָ֢ · . 𝑰𝒏𝒕𝒆𝒓𝒗𝒊𝒆𝒘𝒔. 🤩 ࿙࣪⠀ִ 𓆪 ִ ╾ 𖥔 ╼━━╾ 𖥔 ╼━━╾ 𖥔 ╼━━╾ 𖥔 ╼ 🤩🤩🤩 ׅ ׄ𓆇 𝓑𝓲𝓷𝓲 – journalist ִ ᜔ ⊹ ִ ᜔Инᴛᴇᴩʙью ᴄ жуᴩнᴀᴧиᴄᴛᴋᴏй Янхᴇ !ִ ݊ ׅ 𝒢𑄾 ݂ Тᴦᴋᴀнᴀᴧ - @yangjour ׅ ⊹ ׅ # Сᴛᴀʙь ᴩᴇᴀᴋции ᴇᴄᴧи ᴨᴏнᴩᴀʙиᴧᴏᴄь ۫۫ ೇ۫ ׄ 🤩 🤩 ݂ㅤ ࣪๑ ℳy 𝑩𝒐𝒕 - @Binipandas_bot ݂ 𝑆𝘰𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅 𝒩𝘦𝗍𝗐𝗈𝗋𝗄 🤩 𝗍𝖾𝗅𝖾𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗆 & 𝗍𝗂𝗄𝗍𝗈𝗄
💘2🍓1👾1🦄1
— ребят, выгорела очень сильно, думала что Нью эра поможет, но в итоге не очень она с этой задачей справляется. У меня есть немного контента, но мне безумно не хочется делать текст к видео формату. + к этому у меня закончилась премка, а покупать я её не хочу так как сейчас не веду канал(
💘5👀1
Sticker, posted without a caption
Sticker, posted without a caption
🎁 . . 🌟𝐧т𝕖𝗋α𝖼tׁׅι𝕧є ‹ 💎 —— 🤩 𝗪𝗁ꪮ 𝗋ꫀ𝗮𝗅lყ 𝗅í𝗲 ? 💋 - 𝟥𝟴 . 🪦 ( ( ➖• ➿ 🤩 ➿ •➖ ) ) 🪦 🎲 :; ᴧюди иɜ ʙᴀɯᴇй ᴩᴇᴀᴧьнᴏй жиɜни ɜнᴀюᴛ ᴏ ᴛᴏʍ, чᴛᴏ ʙы ᴄᴏᴄᴛᴏиᴛᴇ ʙ ᴏи? ᴇᴄᴧи дᴀ - ᴛᴏ ᴋᴀᴋ ᴏᴛнᴏᴄяᴛᴄя, ᴀ ᴇᴄᴧи нᴇᴛ - ᴛᴏ ᴨᴏчᴇʍу нᴇ ᴩᴀᴄᴄᴋᴀɜыʙᴀᴇᴛᴇ? 🪦 🎁 ( 𝖨 𝕕𝗼𝗇'𝘁 𝖻𝖾𝗅𝕚𝐞ν𝐞 𝖺𝐧𝗱 𝕞𝖾 . . . 📰 __ @ y𝗮n𝗴j𝗼u𝗿 // 🕯 . 🪦
custom 52649709753084602015custom 52382363586690136514👀2custom 52651639696638970842custom 52719845366437201822custom 54678044179295476772👾1🦄1
Sticker, posted without a caption
😁😆😁 Вам не кажется что это идеальный коллаб?
custom 52719845366437201823👀1👾1💘1
💕: поднажмите с реакциями, я как никак из реста вышла!
custom 52719845366437201822custom 52382363586690136511
⭐😊🤩 . 𝖸𝗔𝖭𝗚𝖧𝗘𝖤 𝗽𝗋𝗲𝗍𝘁𝗒 🎀🎀 𝟏𝟏. 🎀 𝖩𝗢𝖴𝗥 🤩. 🔤 ➿ 🎀➖🎀 🤩 🎀➖🎀 ➿ 🗓 𝖠𝗯ꪮ𝘂𝗍 𝗠ꫀ 🎀🔣 🎀 яԋ𝘅э - 𝗇𝗼𝗍 n𝗲ᥕ 🥂 жყ𝗽 🎀 𝗶𝗻 ꪮ𝗻l𝗶𝗻𝗲 🎁 𝗶n𝗱u𝘀t𝗿y🎀 ⭐𝗕𝖾𝘀𝗍 🤩 🔇 ʝ𝗼𝗎𝗿 🎀 𝖼𝘂𝗍𝗲 & 𝗌𝗲𝗑𝘆 🤍 🧪🎀 𝖺𝗿c𝗵𝗂𝘃ҽ𝘀 🤩 🎀 𝖻𝗼ꪮ𝘀𝗍🔇թ𝗶α𝗿 𝖼𝗵α𝘁✨ ➿ 🎀 ➖🎀 🎀🎀➖ 🎀 ➿ 🔇 🎀 𝖬𝗬 𝖡𝗢𝖳 🥚 🤩 ⭐🎀 𝗒𝗮𝗇𝗴𝗁𝗲𝖾 ❤️ @yanghee_bot ** 🤩 🤩 Եᥱᥣ𝗹 ო𝗲 ց𝗶́𝗿𝗅 !! ➰ 𝖻𝗲𝗍𝘁𝗲𝗋 𝗀𝗂𝗿𝗹𝖿𝗋𝗂𝗲𝗻𝖽 🐍
custom 52649709753084602019custom 52382363586690136517custom 52719845366437201827👾2🦄1custom 52354877857580038241custom 52357308551371551911custom 52651639696638970841
Sticker, posted without a caption
Sticker, posted without a caption
Channel name was changed to «‘‘ 𝘆αɳ𝗴𝗁𝗲є ˙⊹( 𝗆𝖾𝖽𝗂𝖺 ) 🪷»
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @yangjour. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 314,019 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@yangjour named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“‘‘ 𝘆αɳ𝗴𝗁𝗲є ˙⊹( 𝗆𝖾𝖽𝗂𝖺 ) 🪷” (@yangjour), 50 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yangjour.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.