Voice message, posted without a caption

Channel
杨门 (封禁圈的故事)
@yang_pindao
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
11,322subscribers
-8 since we began measuring on 31 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1004407725612 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @yang_pindao |
| Created | 18 August 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 31 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/yang_pindao |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 68% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 05:19 | 11,322 | -9 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 22:40 | 11,331 | -2 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 15:40 | 11,333 | -1 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 03:16 | 11,334 | -2 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 18:01 | 11,336 | +1 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 20:36 | 11,335 | +2 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 12:27 | 11,333 | +2 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 13:48 | 11,331 | -1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 15:27 | 11,332 | +2 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 02:30 | 11,330 | first reading |
Engagement
13 posts held, back to 18 August 2026 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 8.92%
- avg views ÷ 11,322 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,010
- 9 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 9
- of 13 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 13 (18 August 2026 – 2 September 2026) |
| Views total | 9,092 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 00:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 28s
- Average length
- 28s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
在飞机上,穷人就是富人,富人就是骗子
不适合我的领域 终究不想去弄
向流星許願一個沒有悲傷的明天. ╲⠀╲ ⋆⠀╲ ╲ ╲⠀╲ ☾⋆.˚ ⠀ ╲ ⋆。 ☆⠀ ╲⠀⠀ ⊹ ⠀. ☆ ⊹ ⠀⠀ ★
时间过得好快 记得以前还是个清纯初中生 如今是一个罪恶稻天的大叔
Voice message, posted without a caption
你什么时候死全家 我想给你个家
人人都想要真诚和偏爱,可是都充满了虚伪
长久和封禁、举报、各类血腥色情的违规内容打交道,不知不觉里,心慢慢冷了下来。 记不清从哪一刻开始,原本柔软的善意被磨淡,习惯了这些阴暗,不再轻易共情,只剩麻木与冰冷
制所有封号圈的一封信 很多人觉得,封号、举报,本身就带着恶意。 可走在这条路上的人心里清楚,最初拿起封禁这把工具,本不是为了主动攻击谁。 我们一开始,只是想用这种方式护住自己。 不想被诈骗裹挟、不想遭遇勒索威胁、不想被色情、骗局、恶意骚扰不断消耗; 在杂乱的圈子环境里,封禁,是一层自保的屏障,避免自己落入圈套、变得被动而弱小。 但也要记得:自保不等于肆意挥刀。 封禁的底线,该是抵御伤害,而非当作博弈报复、随意打压别人的武器。 别让最初保护自己的初衷,最后变成无端针对他人的戾气。 守住边界,分清自卫与加害,才不会忘了最开始,我们只是想不被欺负而已。
从最开始的默默无闻,到现在都名满天下 谁也没有靠 只凭借自己的信誉 三年从未跑一单 全网无反诈记录 找到一条给500u
作为封禁圈老牌组织杨门,我们永远在跟随时代进步 每当我们踏入一个圈子,都会进入无限的疯狂
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @yang_pindao. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“杨门 (封禁圈的故事)” (@yang_pindao), 11,322 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yang_pindao.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.