Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Английский от Яндекс Практикума

Channel

Английский от Яндекс Практикума

@yandex_english

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

5,270subscribers

-38 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001731028760
TypeChannel
Username@yandex_english
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/yandex_english

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

5,2705,3085,2897 August 2026 — 5,308 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,308 subscribers10 August 2026 — 5,306 subscribers13 August 2026 — 5,302 subscribers16 August 2026 — 5,300 subscribers19 August 2026 — 5,299 subscribers23 August 2026 — 5,303 subscribers26 August 2026 — 5,294 subscribers29 August 2026 — 5,290 subscribers1 September 2026 — 5,289 subscribers6 September 2026 — 5,279 subscribers11 September 2026 — 5,270 subscribers14 September 2026 — 5,271 subscribers18 September 2026 — 5,270 subscribers7 August 202618 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 42 days, net -38. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,264–5,314 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 19:185,270-1
14 Sept 2026, 15:365,271+1
11 Sept 2026, 04:015,270-9
6 Sept 2026, 03:165,279-10
1 Sept 2026, 15:145,289-1
29 Aug 2026, 07:085,290-4
26 Aug 2026, 03:065,294-9
23 Aug 2026, 11:165,303+4
19 Aug 2026, 21:345,299-1
16 Aug 2026, 16:085,300-2
13 Aug 2026, 03:595,302-4
10 Aug 2026, 11:505,306-2
7 Aug 2026, 09:455,308no change
7 Aug 2026, 09:365,308first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 26 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

222 reactions across 16 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥7835.1%
6629.7%
👍2611.7%
😁156.76%
🎉94.05%
💯83.60%
❤‍🔥73.15%
52.25%
👏41.80%
10.45%
🌚10.45%
😡10.45%
🥴10.45%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 222 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 26 January 2026 to 17 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

17 Jul 2026, 09:50 UTC664 views13 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Без регулярной практики в новом языке далеко не уедешь. Отрабатывайте новые выражения и грамматику где угодно — с приложением Английский от Яндекс Практикума. Проходите уроки, когда есть минутка: в метро, в парке или пока ждёте заказ в кофейне. Внутри всё то же, что и в веб-версии: интерактивные задания, тренажёры, словарь и ИИ-помощник. Можно продолжать текущий курс или начать новый. Изучайте материал последовател

👍75🔥1

29 Jun 2026, 12:31 UTC≈1,030 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Над чем вообще смеются в Англии? Над всем подряд — как и у нас. Но британские шутки завязаны на игре слов, эвфемизмах и абсурде, поэтому их не так легко понять с первого раза. Зато шутки в контексте понять легче всего. Такой контекст дают сериалы. Собрали подборку лучших комедийных шоу с чисто британским юмором в новой статье команды курсов английского в Практикуме.

5👍2

26 May 2026, 14:16 UTC≈1,460 views13 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Знаете, как по-английски будет «не лезь на рожон» или «держись от меня подальше»? К выходу нового фильма Гая Ричи «Грязные деньги» мы вместе с @kinopoisk разобрали трейлер по косточкам. Пройдите квиз и проверьте, насколько хорошо вы понимаете гангстерскую лексику. Возможно, узнаете несколько новых словечек, которые помогут выкрутиться из любой передряги.

🔥121

13 Apr 2026, 09:05 UTC≈1,800 views18 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Можно ли использовать ИИ для самостоятельного обучения? Спойлер: можно, но осторожно. Для каких задач подходит ИИ: 1️⃣ Отработать конкретную грамматическую конструкцию 2️⃣ Разобрать непонятное правило 3️⃣ Попрактиковаться в письме 4️⃣ Получить быструю обратную связь или сгенерировать аудио для прослушивания Наше мнение — со всеми этими задачами ИИ справляется неплохо, даже если не идеально с точки зрения методиста

👍8🔥63🥴1

7 Apr 2026, 08:02 UTC≈1,450 views24 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Наш день рождения — повод сделать вам приятное 🎂 В этом году Английскому от Яндекс Практикума исполняется 6 лет и в честь этого события мы подготовили подарки. 1️⃣ Дарим скидку 16% на курсы Для взрослых Для подростков 14–17 лет Для детей 7–13 лет Скидка действует с 7 по 13 апреля. Don’t miss it 🎉 2️⃣ Квиз про английский: от повседневных выражений и идиом до сленга и интересных фактов В комментариях принимаем позд

🎉98🔥6😡1

3 Apr 2026, 09:05 UTC≈1,310 views20 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Давно нас не было и вот возвращаемся с большой наградой🥇 🏆 20 февраля в Москве прошла премия «Я знаю: EdTech». В голосовании, которое длилось с 17 ноября по 30 декабря, приняли участие более 90 000 человек. Именно их выбор определил победителей. 🏆 По итогам голосования мы вновь заняли 1 место в номинации «Лучшее решение в языковом образовании». 🏆 Второй год принимаем поздравления, но от этого они только приятнее 😃

🔥136😁1

30 Mar 2026, 13:35 UTC≈1,390 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Poll

Перевод vs локализация

  1. В сером39%
  2. Грязные деньги61%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

2

30 Mar 2026, 13:35 UTC≈1,410 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026

ГАЙз, что лучше: перевод или локализация? Смотрим отрывок нового фильма ГАЯ Ричи «Грязные деньги»( в оригинале «In the Grey») и голосуем ниже

5🌚1👍1

2 Feb 2026, 11:07 UTC≈2,150 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Poll

Please text me … you finish your meeting.

  1. later15%
  2. after77%
  3. afterwards8%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

🔥51

2 Feb 2026, 11:06 UTC≈1,900 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Poll

First, we checked in at the hotel. …, we went exploring.

  1. afterwards69%
  2. after12%
  3. later19%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

👏3

2 Feb 2026, 11:05 UTC≈1,660 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Poll

We went to a cafe … a movie.

  1. afterwards7%
  2. after87%
  3. later6%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

3

2 Feb 2026, 11:05 UTC≈1,430 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Poll

I’ll call you…

  1. later97%
  2. after1%
  3. afterwards2%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

3

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @yandex_english. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

30 Mar 2026, 13:35 UTCAnonymous Poll59 voters

Перевод vs локализация

  1. В сером39%
  2. Грязные деньги61%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

2 Feb 2026, 11:07 UTCAnonymous Quiz382 voters

Please text me … you finish your meeting.

  1. later15%
  2. after77%
  3. afterwards8%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

2 Feb 2026, 11:06 UTCAnonymous Quiz334 voters

First, we checked in at the hotel. …, we went exploring.

  1. afterwards69%
  2. after12%
  3. later19%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

2 Feb 2026, 11:05 UTCAnonymous Quiz331 voters

We went to a cafe … a movie.

  1. afterwards7%
  2. after87%
  3. later6%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

2 Feb 2026, 11:05 UTCAnonymous Quiz325 voters

I’ll call you…

  1. later97%
  2. after1%
  3. afterwards2%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 26 January 2026 to 17 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Skyeng: Английский для жизни
@skyengweekly · 128,321
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 13 August 2026
Инглекс | Заряжаемся английским
@englex_school · 65,898
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 21 August 2026
Яндекс Практикум
@yndx_practicum · 34,046
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 3 September 2026
Практикум про диджитал-профессии
@mrkt_practicum · 25,124
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 14 September 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Английский от Яндекс Практикума” (@yandex_english), 5,270 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yandex_english.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.