Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Яна Постникова

Channel

Яна Постникова

@yanapost

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Cite this entry

724subscribers

+15 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001197045510
TypeChannel
Username@yanapost
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 October 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/yanapost

Topic

Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 69% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

7047247147 August 2026 — 709 subscribers8 August 2026 — 709 subscribers15 August 2026 — 706 subscribers22 August 2026 — 704 subscribers29 August 2026 — 706 subscribers6 September 2026 — 704 subscribers13 September 2026 — 723 subscribers6 October 2026 — 724 subscribers7 August 20266 October 2026
8 measurements spanning 60 days, net +15. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 701–727 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Oct 2026, 19:37724+1
13 Sept 2026, 19:18723+19
6 Sept 2026, 01:38704-2
29 Aug 2026, 12:09706+2
22 Aug 2026, 23:07704-2
15 Aug 2026, 14:36706-3
8 Aug 2026, 02:17709no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:39709first reading

Engagement

8 posts held, back to 5 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 54s
Average length
38s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

132 reactions across 8 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤6952.3%
🔥3728.0%
💯1712.9%
😁53.79%
🤣21.52%
⚡10.758%
🙏10.758%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 132 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 5 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
21
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 8 we hold a reading for · 63%
Most on one post
9
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @yanapost. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 8 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 17:28 UTC56 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🌳 Летняя подборка 😅Короче, ловите прикол: Хотела я , значит, снять для вас красивый парк. Снимаю первое видео, на фоне какая-то мама начала воспитывать ребенка именно в этот момент (оригинальное звуковое сопровождение🌚) . Думаю: «ладно, сниму другое видео с озером», и тут одна утка начинает шпехать другую 😅 (Крайние два видоса) Короче, съемка не задалась) Или задалась ? )) Возможно, жизнь мне так хотела показ…

❤7😁5🤣2

29 Jul 2026, 16:31 UTC167 views17 reactions3 Starsread 8 August 2026
Voice message

💔Понимаете, что отношения давно себя исчерпали, но не можете уйти? 💔Почему после расставания продолжаете мысленно возвращаться к человеку, скучать, ждать или надеяться? —————————————————— Таймкоды: 00:00 — О чем этот подкаст: почему мы застреваем в разрушающих отношениях и почему после расставания не можем отпустить мысли о человеке? 01:11 — Четыре этапа принятия ситуации 02:28 — Этап 1. Отрицание в отношениях: по…

❤11🔥5🙏1

28 Jul 2026, 08:05 UTC164 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

В тему подкаста выше — отзыв о сессии с запросом «хочу отпустить бывшего, перестать о нем думать и о его предательстве, это длится уже 2 года. Расстались по причине его измены, сейчас просто по-дружески общаемся» 🔥Результат за одну (!) сессию. ❗️Я всегда говорю, что не обязательно «тянуть кота за яйца», годами прорабатывая одно и то же в классической терапии. Такие запросы щелкаются, как семечки, всего за ОДНУ се…

🔥7❤4

27 Jul 2026, 18:37 UTC194 views16 reactions9 Starsread 8 August 2026
Voice message

💔КАК ОТПУСТИТЬ БЫВШЕГО? 🔴Что сделать, чтобы уже наконец «отпустило»? Рабочая пошаговая инструкция 🔴Почему, спустя месяцы и годы, ты мыслями возвращаешься к человеку? 🔴Почему техники прощения и медитации на отпускание на тебя не срабатывают ? ✏️Пиши в комментариях или в личку слово «ОТНОШЕНИЯ» и получи индивидуальный разбор твоей ситуации (голосовое сообщение ~15 минут) На разборе ты узнаешь: — какие глубинные п…

❤9🔥4💯3

20 Jul 2026, 05:06 UTC268 views12 reactions7 Starsread 8 August 2026
Voice message

🔴Если Вам приходится заслуживать чью-то любовь, “догонять” партнера 🔴доказывать, что вы достойны быть рядом 🔴постоянно чувствуете себя нелюбимой /нелюбимым 🔴замечаете, что снова и снова влюбляетесь в недоступных: женатых, на расстоянии, медийных личностей и духовных лидеров — обязательно послушайте это аудио. 👫Также разберем, кто на самом деле влияет на сценарии в отношениях — мама или папа? Развеем мифы. —————…

❤6🔥5⚡1

10 Jul 2026, 14:19 UTC297 views28 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Не знаю, как у вас, но… я когда узнала про это исследование, моя внутренняя дикая женщина прям «выдохнула») как-будто часть меня легализовали. В тему вышесказанного, я вообще давно задумывалась над этими формулировками: «Мужчине нужна женщина, которая в него поверит и он тогда достигнет успеха…» Или «Женщине нужна опора, защита, поддержка в виде мужчины» Алло) Такие отношения вообще не про двух зрелых людей, а…

💯14❤10🔥4

10 Jul 2026, 13:53 UTC236 views16 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Хотите ШОК-контент? 🪨 Женщины в каменном веке были ОХОТНИЦАМИ наравне с мужчинами. И это не фемский вброс, а научные исследования последних лет*. 🧪 Ученые по пептидам зубной эмали научились определять пол даже очень древних останков. И, благодаря проведению протеомного анализа, выяснили, что ~30-50% (!) захороненных тел на территории Америки и не только с копьями, стрелами и другими охотничьими предметами — ЖЕНСКИ…

❤10🔥6

5 Jul 2026, 11:33 UTC254 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Лето в Петербурге 🌱

❤12🔥6

Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @yanapost. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Яна Постникова” (@yanapost), 724 subscribers as measured 6 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yanapost.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.