Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for brains are sєxy🧠

Channel

brains are sєxy🧠

@yana_pol1

Not marked by Telegram, checked 19 September 2026

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

2,668subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 18 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002208165217
TypeChannel
Username@yana_pol1
Description@nensi_139 дальше розказую свою нікомуневсрату думку про книжки🙂
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded18 September 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/yana_pol1

Growth

2,66818 Sept 2026, 18:47 — 2,668 subscribers18 Sept 2026, 19:22 — 2,668 subscribers18 Sept 2026, 18:4718 Sept 2026, 19:22
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,665–2,671 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 19:222,668no change
18 Sept 2026, 18:472,668first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 4 September 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
48.8%
avg views ÷ 2,668 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,300
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.94%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 13 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 September 2026
Posts held13 (4 September 202618 September 2026)
Views total16,923
Reactions total667
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken18 Sept 2026, 19:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,340
Videos
50
Links
290

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

667 reactions across 13 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
53580.2%
❤‍🔥406.00%
😍334.95%
💋172.55%
🥰172.55%
😁131.95%
🔥71.05%
🙏20.3%
🤯20.3%
👍10.15%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 667 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 4 September 2026 to 18 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

15 Sept 2026, 14:44 UTC≈1,170 views61 reactionsread 18 September 2026
Photo

красіве два!

56💋4❤‍🔥1

15 Sept 2026, 14:44 UTC≈1,060 views73 reactionsread 18 September 2026
Photo

красіве раз!

67💋5❤‍🔥1

14 Sept 2026, 08:38 UTC≈1,230 views23 reactionsread 18 September 2026
Photo

📚Дні Книжкової Країни: книжки, зустрічі та трохи звичного життя Попри те, що «Книжкову країну» цього року перенесли на квітень, ця осінь не залишиться без книжкових подій. 18, 19 і 20 вересня відбудуться презентації книжок, зустрічі з авторами, Премія книжкових блогерів, камерний концерт та, звісно, буде дуже багато нових книжок. «Дні Книжкової країни» проходитимуть у книгарнях Readeat, «Наш Формат», «Книгарня Є»,

13❤‍🔥8💋2

12 Sept 2026, 11:43 UTC989 views27 reactionsread 18 September 2026
Forwarded from @syn_octPhoto

В притулку мої мами критична ситуація і щодня вона стає все гірше й гірше. Мабуть, це один з найтемніших періодів з моменту існування ГО "Дім котів"💔 Понад 200 котів, хворі кошенята, евакуйовані з прифронтових зон коти, у яких купа вірусів та хвороб. Всіх потрібно лікувати, обробляти від паразитів, каструвати. У деяких котів страшенні рани, які не заживають. Допомоги від партнерів та фондів зараз майже немає. Всі з

19❤‍🔥6🙏2

12 Sept 2026, 04:23 UTC≈1,290 views69 reactionsread 18 September 2026

Нє, не так. Книжка то просто замічатєльна! (9/10) Але ж цей додік дебільний! Як ви це читали і не капали барбовал? Вам не хотілося влізти в книжку і плюнути йому в мордяку? Не повірю, що не хотілось зацідить цим романом в мімо-проходящого і нічого-незнаючого чулувіка, шоб отомстить за цю бідосю всім представникам цеї статі! Нє, ну вона тоже Мать Тереза канєшно, але поговоримо у відгуках, бо Галя берегу не бачить вже

54😁12❤‍🔥3

12 Sept 2026, 03:02 UTC≈1,270 views42 reactionsread 18 September 2026
Photo

Я ненавиджу цю книжку. Реально🥲

38❤‍🔥2🤯2

11 Sept 2026, 07:53 UTC≈1,360 views23 reactionsread 18 September 2026

https://readroom.club/@brains_are_sexy Як мене знайти в readroom В понеділок почну читати «Тіні між нами» можливо захочете доєднатись!

19❤‍🔥3🥰1

9 Sept 2026, 22:14 UTC≈1,730 views56 reactionsread 18 September 2026
Photo

Значить, я вже в тренді, я в курсі, я в readroom🤌🏻 Перші враження: я ше чючють розбираюсь шо куди клацать, але це як тредс тільки без дурачків:) Така прикольна атмосфера і я так сподіваюсь що вона такою і залишиться! Ви вже там є?

47❤‍🔥5🥰3😁1

9 Sept 2026, 20:41 UTC≈1,300 views28 reactionsread 18 September 2026
Forwarded from @diknyjkovaPhoto

Гляньте шо! 🤑 В одній колонці з інтервʼю вмістились артур і мініпути, зайчик та атака титанів І улюблені авторки та книги, звичайно 🧚‍♀

24❤‍🔥4

9 Sept 2026, 20:41 UTC≈1,310 views20 reactionsread 18 September 2026

Наша Ді в тєлєвізорі!💅🏻💓

18❤‍🔥1🥰1

5 Sept 2026, 15:24 UTC≈1,750 views129 reactionsread 18 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

77😍33🔥7💋6❤‍🔥4🥰2

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @yana_pol1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

думки вголос
@dmkvhls · 23,257
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 18 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“brains are sєxy🧠” (@yana_pol1), 2,668 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yana_pol1.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.