Channel
@yan8595
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
842subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002946403017 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @yan8595 |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/yan8595 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 03:18 | 842 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 19:31 | 842 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 8 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 3 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 10 (8 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,712 |
| Reactions total | 2 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 19:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
10 reactions across 5 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 90.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 9 | 90.0% | |
| 👨💻 | 1 | 10.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
杭州秋雅总群：https://telegram.me/nanjinggeren66 🌳【客名】：feifan 📆【日期】: 8月5日 🧘♀【老师】: #钱多多 📮【联系】：@yang67548888 🏡【位置】：滨江区 💰【课费】：800p 🌏【罩杯】：D+ 🧖♀【服务】：莞式 📋【详情】：最近没有释放，今天感觉来了，正好在附近问了一下钱多多有没有空，赶上ls被🕊了，于是直接让老师遥控上楼。ls看上去年纪确实不大，身材也很匀称，进门交了学费后就开始脱衣服帮忙洗澡了，洗完澡后进屋开始调情，多多的服务做的真是面面俱到，同样是莞式服务，多多的莞式要更胜一筹。顺手摸了下ls的馒头🍺。正戏进入后能感觉出来ls年轻的优势，下面干几下就出水但是吸力很足，很紧，作为学生索性也不客气直接干了一会出货。因为ls屋里开了空调的原因干完一身汗还很累，于是问能不能休息会，ls说时间约课留的时间都很充足所以没关系，然后洗澡穿衣服坐着和ls聊了会天…
搬新家了。老铁们。不回就打电话 15157343626 与你号 mn675486 QQ3814514930
❤2
滨江95-98 口技一流 不回就打与你号 mn675482 v 信号。 mn675482 电话 15157343626
面具专用报告模板 『推荐指数:⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️好评)』 【验证人】：an 【老师昵称】：钱多多 【联系方式】：yang67548888 【地 区 】：滨江银泰附近 【价格】：500 【年龄】：31 【身高】：156 【体重】：98 【凶器】：D杯 【手感】：软软的很舒服，真熊 手感很舒服 爱不是释手， 【见面感觉】：热情奔放 【态度如何】 服务：半套 时间： 7.11 地点： 滨江银泰附近 联系方式： @yang67548888 细节：位置离地铁口很近，很好找。遥控上门后就被姐姐拍了下屁股，然后自己脱光光去洗的时候小老弟已经怒发冲冠了，都怪姐姐身材太顶了！洗完擦干趴着姐姐就给来了胸推，然后是舔耳私语喊老公，顶不住啊，浑身都酥酥麻麻的。然后趴着抬高屁股姐姐给毒龙打飞机，真的第一次体验趴着被人撸，太有感觉，姐姐的半套水平真的没话说。接着就是正面姐姐上来自己动，技术真的太顶了，小马达加贴身私语老公，三下五除二就让我交代了，真的…
❤3👨💻1
面具专用报告模板 『推荐指数:⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️好评)』 【验证人】：an 【老师昵称】：钱多多 【联系方式】：yang67548888 【地 区 】：滨江银泰附近 【价格】：500 【年龄】：31 【身高】：156 【体重】：98 【凶器】：D杯 【手感】：软软的很舒服，真熊 手感很舒服 爱不是释手， 【见面感觉】：热情奔放 【态度如何】 服务：半套 时间： 7.11 地点： 萧山 联系方式： @yang67548888 细节：位置离地铁口很近，很好找。遥控上门后就被姐姐拍了下屁股，然后自己脱光光去洗的时候小老弟已经怒发冲冠了，都怪姐姐身材太顶了！洗完擦干趴着姐姐就给来了胸推，然后是舔耳私语喊老公，顶不住啊，浑身都酥酥麻麻的。然后趴着抬高屁股姐姐给毒龙打飞机，真的第一次体验趴着被人撸，太有感觉，姐姐的半套水平真的没话说。接着就是正面姐姐上来自己动，技术真的太顶了，小马达加贴身私语老公，三下五除二就让我交代了，真的还是头一…
杭州秋雅总群：https://telegram.me/nanjinggeren66 🌳【客名】：魔法师 📆【日期】: 7月14日 🧘♀【老师】: #钱多多 📮【联系】：@yang67548888 🏡【位置】：滨江区 💰【课费】：800p 🌏【罩杯】：D+ 🧖♀【服务】：莞式 📋【详情】：和老师约好时间后，由于当天晚上下班加了会班导致迟到了差不多十多分钟，钱多多老师也没有催我，还跟我说没事慢慢来，随后一起去洗澡，全自动洗澡，不用我动，然后洗完趴在床上做b面，先是小小按摩了一波随后过水毒龙，按顺序进行，翻身a面，舔了舔奶头，开始口下面，由于比较粗，多多的牙老磨到，没多久就要求戴套开干，先由老师在上，随后翻身而上直接干，最后换成后入，个人对后入很有感觉，没多久就发射了，老师先去防水我先休息然后叫我去洗澡，别说情绪价值确实拉满，态度很到位，可以二刷 【机车行为】： 无 【优点缺点】：会二刷 很好 【推荐程度】：⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
❤1
面具专用报告模板 『推荐指数:⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️好评)』 【验证人】：an 【老师昵称】：钱多多 【联系方式】：yang67548888 【地 区 】：滨江银泰附近 【价格】：500 【年龄】：31 【身高】：156 【体重】：98 【凶器】：D杯 【手感】：软软的很舒服，真熊 手感很舒服 爱不是释手， 【见面感觉】：热情奔放 【态度如何】 服务：半套 时间： 7.11 地点： 萧山 联系方式： @yangnamei 细节：位置离地铁口很近，很好找。遥控上门后就被姐姐拍了下屁股，然后自己脱光光去洗的时候小老弟已经怒发冲冠了，都怪姐姐身材太顶了！洗完擦干趴着姐姐就给来了胸推，然后是舔耳私语喊老公，顶不住啊，浑身都酥酥麻麻的。然后趴着抬高屁股姐姐给毒龙打飞机，真的第一次体验趴着被人撸，太有感觉，姐姐的半套水平真的没话说。接着就是正面姐姐上来自己动，技术真的太顶了，小马达加贴身私语老公，三下五除二就让我交代了，真的还是头一次被女…
❤2
https://t.me/Mjww_hz
半岛SPA模板：https://t.me/bd_spa 【出击时间】：7月10日 【出击老师/商家】：#95.98钱多多@yang67548888 【出击留名】：不嘻嘻了 【开课位置】：滨江 【修车水费】：竞拍p 【服务点评】：夯 【过程描述】：听老师指挥进到房间，老师一开门完全惊艳到我，比照片好看太多，老师带我去洗漱，不用自己动手老师帮忙洗，服务态度很好，洗完坐在沙发，老师过来一口含住，这感觉直击灵魂，爽飞， 夯爆炸了，一口一个老公，全程没有一次齿感，这个口活太炸了，后面老师让我爬下，给我来了绝活毒龙，这一下也是直接给我带动了起来，这服务真的吊，最后在老师一次又一次的深喉下，我也是兴奋的射了老师一满口，这一段时间大脑空白，可能和女生高潮一样的感觉，感觉人都轻飘飘的，瞬间掏空了，爽飞了，滨江附近的兄弟可以出击了，我只能说夯爆了 环境卫生：小区房，环境好 初见印象：本人比照片好看 深入了解：皮肤嫩滑，胸c，屁股挺翘 服务项目：sp…
❤1
滨江银泰附近半套全套口爆滴滴在线。口技一流
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @yan8595. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 943,039 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@yan8595 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“滨江95.98个人” (@yan8595), 842 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yan8595.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.