Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for IDOL

Channel

IDOL

@yakyanlive

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,221subscribers

-6 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001135081793
TypeChannel
Username@yakyanlive
CreatedBetween 1 June 2017 and 30 September 2020— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/yakyanlive

Growth

2,2212,2272,2246 August 2026 — 2,227 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,226 subscribers9 August 2026 — 2,223 subscribers13 August 2026 — 2,221 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,220–2,228 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 02:372,221-2
9 Aug 2026, 16:032,223-3
7 Aug 2026, 00:502,226-1
6 Aug 2026, 21:322,227first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 4 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
35.2%
avg views ÷ 2,221 subscribers
Avg views / post
783
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.93%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 11 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held11 (4 June 20265 August 2026)
Views total3,913
Reactions total193
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 16:49 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

315 reactions across 11 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍20765.7%
🔥4915.6%
3310.5%
😁216.67%
😱30.952%
😢20.635%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 315reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 4 June 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 11 we hold a reading for · 27%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @yakyanlive. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 11 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 June 2026 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 17:00 UTC444 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Один из примеров 1. Дождался отклонения спреда 2. Смотрю на красивую раскорреляцию, точка спреда есть. Смотрим фильтры 3. По BAND прогноз был вниз -30% 4. По PYTH прогноз был вверх +30% Все звезды сошлись, луна полная, магические числа подтверждают, что верняк😄 Цены достаточно быстро начали сходиться. Вы должны понимать, что в этот трейд я и так, и так бы заходил, но кроме него я выполнил еще 8 подобных. 2 убыточны

👍10🔥62

5 Aug 2026, 17:00 UTC452 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🥸По гридам заканчиваю и параллельно тестирую стратегию "необъяснимо, но факт" Парный трейдинг это одна из старых крепких стратегий в моем арсенале. Принцип там не меняется(работа на сближение), но с фильтрами я периодически экспериментирую. На resonance вышла обнова с облаком прогнозов. Тестирую вторую неделю. ✅Основа: 1. Смотрю ценовые движения отобранных активов (коррелируемые, с подобным бизнесом, коинтеграция н

👍6🔥3

28 Jul 2026, 20:06 UTC905 views125 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

Закончил анализ месячных экспираций Интересные выводы Вначале еще раз напишу, что рынок эффективный, поэтому безрисковых ситуаций там нет. Если просто покупать пут спред и открывать грид - то 90% времени сидим в убытке, потому что гриды не успевают отбивать стоимость премий опционов. И только в тех случаях, когда происходит снижение цены к нижней границе - тогда заработок и на метчах, и на пут спреде (вола растет, до

👍116🔥63

26 Jul 2026, 17:13 UTC952 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

меня не взломали, все ок. думаю все понимают, что это скам я ленюсь пост оформить, а тут выложили историю та еще и марафон запустили, в воскресенье. Точно не мой формат😄 Уверен, что у всех рациональное мышление развито достаточно, чтоб подобные штуки игнорить Приятного вечера 🌆

😁212🔥1

24 Jul 2026, 19:55 UTC≈1,160 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Каждый год приблизительно летом мне приходит в голову проверить еще пару вариантов как хеджировать грид стратегии опционами. И каждый раз я убеждаюсь, что рынок эффективен и идеального хеджа не существует 😐 В этот раз я взял пут спред с проданной ногой на 20% ниже цены входа и покупкой ближайшего к нему пута на квартальных экспирациях (например, -50кР + 55кР) Грид с не симметричными границами (-20% +5%), риск и объем

👍13🔥31

16 Jul 2026, 19:48 UTC≈1,410 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Когда открываем протектив пут на коин-м опционах и фьючах, то нужно лонг по фьючу брать размером страйк умноженный на количество путов. На скрине пример где куплено 14.03 БТС и 10 путов. А если это делать на юсдс опционах, то взял 10 путов - значит нужно купить 10 фьюча. Почему разница? из-за того, что при покупке коин-м пута на балансе появляется бумажный долг в 4.03 БТС, а долг это шорт позиция и чтоб ее перекрыть

👍9🔥2

25 Jun 2026, 19:30 UTC≈2,010 views28 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

За что может забанить HashHedge? (опыт подписчика) За ПАРНЫЙ ТРЕЙДИНГ Если вы на одном челлендже открываете лонг по битку, а на другом шорт по солане - будьте готовы, что вас забанят. Кто-то следит за изменениями в правилах? мне кажется, что они день и ночь туда что-то дописывают 😄 Риск департамент считает это арбитражным абьюзом. Кто-то из рисковиков в чате гпт прочитал "статистический арбитраж" и такой "ок, доба

👍19🔥4😱3😢2

24 Jun 2026, 17:46 UTC≈1,320 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

в какой-то момент покупатели пут опционов начнут фиксировать результат. в это время продавцам опционов уже не будет смысла держать хедж - будут откупать базовый актив или фьючерс. сценарий достижения макс пейна сомнительный, но я прикуплю колл вне денег на начало июля.

👍13🔥3

21 Jun 2026, 20:11 UTC≈1,470 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

А если к предыдущей конструкции добавить еще покупку пут спреда 40/45 и продажу колл спреда 90/95, то у нас получается безрисковый левередж с защитой от глубокого падения. Единственный минус это плавающий фандинг, но можно на срочном фьючерсе зайти и заплатить фикс базис. эта конструкция отлично открывается через блок заказы еще и со сниженной комиссией. имба

👍14🔥21

21 Jun 2026, 09:40 UTC≈1,730 views39 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

По разным причинам у вас может быть куплен спот эфир или биток с целями сильно выше. Тогда этот лайфхак для вас. Разберем простой пример: купил 1 биток по 65к, буду добирать по 60к, по 55к и т.д.(DCA в целом). Цель уровень 90к. Я резервирую деньги на будущие покупки. Плюс меня сожрет фомо, если цена с текущих улетит. 💪Поэтому делаю не супер рисковый левередж через опционы. Под залог битка открываю лонг на фьючерсе+п

24🔥8👍7

4 Jun 2026, 15:31 UTC≈1,860 views11 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

Забаним за честность 😄 Каждому аффилейт партнеру выделяют менеджера компании. Я своего спрашивал за каждый нюанс. Так 24 февраля я спрашивал за доп аккаунт. На что получил ответ, который к сожалению сейчас уже изменен, но в целом из него можно было сделать вывод, что доп аккаунт не запрещен. Информация транслировалась другим. В основном эта фича использовалась с целью получить более дешевый первый челлендж. Регаеш

🔥11

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @yakyanlive. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 195,984 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“IDOL” (@yakyanlive), 2,221 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yakyanlive.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.