Local community — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 82% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
60 measurements spanning 94 days, net -126. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 22,387–22,655 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 60
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Nov 2026, 15:02
22,418
-10
7 Nov 2026, 11:45
22,428
-16
6 Nov 2026, 12:08
22,444
-3
4 Nov 2026, 06:54
22,447
-2
3 Nov 2026, 03:48
22,449
-10
2 Nov 2026, 07:17
22,459
-4
1 Nov 2026, 09:56
22,463
-12
31 Oct 2026, 06:20
22,475
+3
30 Oct 2026, 05:31
22,472
-10
29 Oct 2026, 06:30
22,482
+2
28 Oct 2026, 07:32
22,480
-10
27 Oct 2026, 03:57
22,490
+6
26 Oct 2026, 04:40
22,484
-13
25 Oct 2026, 02:27
22,497
-14
23 Oct 2026, 23:40
22,511
-6
22 Oct 2026, 06:17
22,517
-15
20 Oct 2026, 21:45
22,532
-4
19 Oct 2026, 17:36
22,536
+6
18 Oct 2026, 19:19
22,530
-9
17 Oct 2026, 19:17
22,539
first reading
Engagement
952 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 97 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
4.03%
avg views ÷ 22,418 subscribers
Avg views / post
904
175 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.10%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
175
of 952 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 163 of 175 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 November 2026
Posts held
952 (5 August 2026 – 8 November 2026)
Views total
158,152
Reactions total
1,688
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Nov 2026, 14:51 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1h 41m
Average length
44s
Measured directly from 138 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
11,193 reactions across 896 posts, in 62 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
2,019
18.0%
❤
1,778
15.9%
🤣
866
7.74%
🙏
716
6.40%
😱
631
5.64%
🤬
629
5.62%
👎
627
5.60%
⚡
472
4.22%
💯
408
3.65%
😢
315
2.81%
🔥
293
2.62%
💊
259
2.31%
👏
214
1.91%
😭
172
1.54%
😡
168
1.50%
🥴
157
1.40%
🕊
151
1.35%
🤝
137
1.22%
😁
120
1.07%
😍
100
0.893%
42 further kinds
961
8.59%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 910 of the 952 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11,292 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 952 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 8 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
4.31%
41 of 952 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
41
posts carrying an erid · 24 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
1,020
over 41 measured posts
Median views · rest
990
over 911 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2Ranyk8BjpP
3
1 October 2026
14 October 2026
2Ranykhfrdh
3
5 October 2026
12 October 2026
2Ranymxvr7D
3
1 October 2026
9 October 2026
2RanymzHTQP
3
9 October 2026
13 October 2026
2RanyoD5yRM
3
25 August 2026
29 August 2026
2RanykAYngK
2
8 October 2026
12 October 2026
2RanykKd4x3
2
19 August 2026
26 August 2026
2Ranyms2aPV
2
7 October 2026
10 October 2026
2Ranyn4g1K9
2
24 August 2026
26 August 2026
2RanynLhjgw
2
12 August 2026
14 August 2026
2RanynR3eZZ
2
7 August 2026
12 August 2026
2RanyoAKRqd
2
25 August 2026
27 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it. 12 further tokens are held for this entry and not listed here.
Measured over the 952 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 8 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 9 of 175 posts held from the last 30 days (5.14%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Результаты неожиданного сотрудничества между компанией «Сахабулт» и молодым брендом «Колд Инк» выглядят свежо и дерзко.
Здорово, что крупное предприятие ищет новые пути развития и новую аудиторию, не останавливаясь просто на унтах и шубах.
@yakutsk_vecherniy
Масштабно, стильно и аутентично: в Якутске отгремел второй сезон Недели моды!
В креативном кластере «Квартал труда» прошел большой подиумный показ, который охватил вдвое больше участников, чем весной. В этот раз свои коллекции представили 34 дизайнера, а на подиум вышли 113 моделей.
Как отмечает директор креативного кластера «Квартал труда» Наталья Нарушевич, фэшн-событие будет проходить дважды в год, открывая кажд…
Российские ученые впервые обнаружили на Марсе действующий вулкан
Сегодня наука уверена, что примерно три миллиарда лет назад и раньше на Марсе "били" вулканы. Но с годами планета постепенно остывала и уже практически не подает признаков вулканической жизни.
Но Марс, который до сих пор считался остывшей, почти "мертвой" планетой, все-таки вулканически активен! А значит, именно по этим адресам надо искать признаки жи…
Фильм «Айхал» и его актеры победили в трех номинациях зрительского голосования IX ЯМКФ
На IX Якутском международном кинофестивале подвели итоги зрительского онлайн-голосования. Лучшим якутским фильмом стала картина «Айхал» режиссера Дьулусхана Андросова. Эрхан Слепцов и Ильяна Павлова, сыгравшие в этом фильме, заняли первые места в номинациях «Лучшая мужская роль» и «Лучшая женская роль».
Читайте далее: https://vech…
В креативном кластере «Квартал Труда» в самом разгаре Неделя моды.
Событие собрало более 30 местных дизайнеров, стилистов, моделей и экспертов. Вчера участники уже обсудили будущее локальных брендов на бизнес-интенсивах, а
сегодня — большой подиумный показ. Свои новые работы представят такие яркие бренды, как INNIKI, SAAS, PARASKOVYA и OYUU. Зрителей также ждут интригующая коллаборация COLD INK и концерна «Сахабулт»…
Прокуратура республики сообщает, что из квартиры дома по ул. Ойунского в ожоговое отделение доставили ребенка 2017 г.р., которого ударило током при использовании электрического удлинителя.
@tprocsakha
@yakutsk_vecherniy
Регламент соревнований на 08 ноября:
9.30 — Финал для групп:
Мальчики и девочки 8-9 лет
Юноши и девушки 10-12 лет
11.00 — Финал для групп:
Юноши и девушки 13-14 лет
Юноши и девушки 15-16 лет
13.00 — Финал для групп:
Любители женщины от 17 лет и старше
Спортсмены женщины от 17 лет и старше
14.30 — Финал для групп:
Любители мужчины от 17 лет и старше
Спортсмены мужчины от 17 лет и старше
16.00 — Церемония награжде…
07-08 ноября состоятся Чемпионат и Первенство Республики Саха (Якутия) по скалолазанию!
Место проведения: СК «Дохсун» (г. Якутск, ул. Лермонтова, 62/5)
Дисциплина: Лазание на трудность
Соревнования проводятся в группах:
1) Участники Первенства РС (Я)
- МАЛЬЧИКИ И ДЕВОЧКИ (8-9 лет);
- МАЛЬЧИКИ И ДЕВОЧКИ (10-12 лет);
- МАЛЬЧИКИ И ДЕВОЧКИ (13-14 лет);
- ЮНОШИ И ДЕВУШКИ (15-16);
2) Участники Чемпионата РС (Я)
- ЛЮБИТЕЛ…
Сегодня отмечают Международный день КВН. Идея праздника была предложена президентом международного клуба КВН Александром Масляковым. Дата празднования была выбрана в честь годовщины первой игры Клуба веселых и находчивых, вышедшей в эфир 8 ноября 1961 года. И в 2001 году в России и некоторых странах СНГ впервые отметили Международный день КВН.
В первой игре КВН участвовали студенты Института иностранных языков и Мос…
В «Кружало» сегодня прошла ярмарка коллекционеров.
Марки, значки, монеты, банкноты, винтажный скарб. Однако же уникальных или примечательных экспонатов замечено не было.
@yakutsk_vecherniy
🔥5👏1💯1
Showing the 12 most recent of 952 posts we hold for @yakutsk_vecherniy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@yakutsk_vecherniy edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
8 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 37 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
1
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
0
vacant every time we have ever looked
@yakutsk_vecherniy named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
@online_yakutia named in 1 post, 2 September 2026 – 2 September 2026 · confirmed gone 13 October 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 20 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
SD Новости Якутии @sakhaday · 40,104 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 12 September 2026
Novosti_yakutska @novosty_yakutska · 34,052 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 13 September 2026
Пряная Якутия @pryanayayakutia · 21,886 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 22 September 2026
AZZIMOOD / ЯКУТИЯ @azzimood · 86,927 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 13 September 2026
«РАБОТА» Якутск @work_yakutsk · 20,595 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 27 September 2026
СПОРТ ЯКУТИИ @sport_yakutia · 20,166 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 28 September 2026
Управление образования ОА г.Якутска @yaguo_official · 18,873 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 3 October 2026
Топор (Сүгэ) Якутск+🪓 @toporyakutia14 · 20,886 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 5 October 2026
НВК «Саха» @nvk_sakha · 23,911 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 28 September 2026
ТОРБОЗНОЕ РАДИО @Torboznoe_radio · 30,487 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 13 September 2026
This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Якутск Вечерний” (@yakutsk_vecherniy), 22,418 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yakutsk_vecherniy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.