TG必备的搜索引擎,快搜kuai帮你发现有趣群组、频道、视频、音乐、电影、新闻 | Find cool stuff all in one bot! 机器人:@kuai @kuaia @kuaiaa 👉 https://t.me/kuaia?start=a_3RTFH2A

Channel
成都外围川蜀真实评价 丫姐严选
@yajie1818
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
6,339subscribers
+125 since we began measuring on 15 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001966869395 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @yajie1818 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 15 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 30 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/yajie1818 |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 30 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 58% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Sept 2026, 15:02 | 6,339 | +121 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 20:58 | 6,218 | +4 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 04:22 | 6,214 | no change |
| 15 Sept 2026, 03:47 | 6,214 | first reading |
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 19 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.032%
- avg views ÷ 6,339 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2.0
- 1 post measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 1
- of 17 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 17 (19 March 2026 – 15 September 2026) |
| Views total | 2 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Sept 2026, 04:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 29s
- Average length
- 29s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
45 reactions across 12 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 82.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 37 | 82.2% | |
| 👍 | 8 | 17.8% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 45 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 19 March 2026 to 15 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
【妹子花名】: 米娅 【验证留名】:B612 【验证时间】:8.21 【所在位置】:上门 【修车水费】:2500 【身高身材】:一米七出头 【妹子年龄】: 21,真的是大学生 【湿度紧度昆度评分】: 一摸一手水,紧致白虎 【颜值评分】:9.5 【身材评分】:9 【态度机车评分】:完全不机车 【女友感评分】:10 【服务评分】:9 【时间管理评分】:10,满钟不催 【性价比评分】:9 【综合评分】:9.5 【优点缺点】:大蟒蛇,吻到窒息,情绪价值慢慢,身材高大,皮肤细腻,干干净净的天生白虎尤其加分 【是否值得回锅】:是 【推荐程度】: 分/满分10.0分; 评分标准 6分为及格,7分为良品(考虑价格可以看一看),8分 (值得价格并且建议体验),9分(实为该价位中少见的精品),10分(极品) 【个人发挥】:时隔有一年了,终于再次见面,明显比之前瘦了点,不过还是高高大大的哈哈哈,完全是模特的料子。几句寒暄后,再次体验到让我想…
❤1
贝贝
报告模版 【🦄妹妹】:青柠 【💰价格】:25 【🐺狼友】:xxxx 【😻长相评价】:7,长的一般,御姐类型 【🫦身材评价】:8.5,高,165+,🐻大、是科技🐻,屁股没啥肉。 【💋态度评价】:9,态度没得说,态度好,洗完澡慢慢给你从上到下擦身体 【👅服务评价】:9,服务专业,但是给了我一种太专业的感觉,不像围子反而像lf,还有ab面的按摩服务。 【😍个人发挥】:进门到出门两火1个小时都没得,直接被秒。妹子所有动作都太专业了,专业到给我就是lf的感觉。口活好。女上很能动。说的要喷,感觉就是尿了两滴,拔出来几秒钟再喷哪里叫喷,跟之前遇到的那种喷的不一样。第一火正常出,休息了十来分钟妹子就开始按摩正反面,然后又口硬了开干,后边直接kb。态度、服务还是可以的,完事了妹子还喊我睡会再走。 【🔥值得打卡/回锅】:不回锅。 评分标准 6分为及格,7分为良品(考虑价格可以看一看),8分(值得价格并且建议体验),9分(实为该价位中少见的精品),…
【🦄妹妹】:库洛米 【💰价格】:中大 【🐺狼友】:ad 【😻长相评价】:可爱型,耐看,不怎么会化妆 【🫦身材评价】:矮个萝莉有胸 【💋态度评价】:刚做这一行,很拘谨,不怎么放得开,但是听话 【👅服务评价】:口活还行 【😍个人发挥】:难得有值得打卡的萝莉,身材相貌都是中大水准,很有礼貌也很听话,缺点就是刚下水放不开,不怎么蛇,综合起来秒杀现在成都市面上80%的潲水婆娘 【🔥值得打卡/回锅】:可以回锅 评分标准 6分为及格,7分为良品(考虑价格可以看一看),8分(值得价格并且建议体验),9分(实为该价位中少见的精品),10分(极品) 🍓永久ID @yajieVIP 🍓无法私信 @yajie18bot 👅成都选妃 🍓 全国大圈 🍓反馈报告 🍓全国包养
❤1
TG必备的搜索引擎,快搜kuai帮你发现有趣群组、频道、视频、音乐、电影、新闻 | Find cool stuff all in one bot! 机器人:@kuai @kuaia @kuaiaa 👉 https://t.me/kuaia?start=a_3RTFH2A
报告模版 【🦄妹妹】:心怡 【💰价格】:中大 【🐺狼友】:拔吊无情 【😻长相评价】:8,化了妆还是非常不错,还需增强皮肤管理 【🫦身材评价】:有胸有屁股,一点点小肚子 【💋态度评价】:态度好的没话说 【👅服务评价】:基础服务 【😍个人发挥】:妹子身材 颜值都还是不错的 态度没话说 脚都垫麻了 一直没说啥 健谈 情商高 【🔥值得打卡/回锅】:打卡 评分标准 8分(值得价格并且建议体验) 🍓永久ID @yajieVIP 🍓无法私信 @yajie18bot 👅成都选妃 🍓 全国大圈 🍓反馈报告 🍓全国包养
❤2
【🦄妹妹】:春娇 【💰价格】: 中大 【🐺狼友】:刀刀 【😻长相评价】:9分 【🫦身材评价】:8分 【💋态度评价】:10分 【👅服务评价】:9分 【😍个人发挥】:御姐脸,腿也不错,唯一不足的可能就是胸了,但我对胸没啥要求。初见以为是个冰块,但实际全程不冷场,很热情。态度也很好。冲着脸去的可以打卡,穿搭也不错,属于走在路上会回头的那种 【🔥值得打卡/回锅】:可打卡也可回锅 评分标准 6分为及格,7分为良品(考虑价格可以看一看),8分(值得价格并且建议体验),9分(实为该价位中少见的精品),10分(极品) 🍓永久ID @yajieVIP 🍓无法私信 @yajie18bot 👅成都选妃 🍓 全国大圈 🍓反馈报告 🍓全国包养
❤1👍1
【🦄妹妹】:柯甜 【💰价格】:中大 【🐺狼友】:yuki 【😻长相评价】:清纯甜美有一点御姐风8 【🫦身材评价】:8 【💋态度评价】:8 【👅服务评价】:8 【😍个人发挥】:甜妹脸,身材很匀称,水巨多都要溢出来了,喜欢水多的无脑干,特别润,人很热情也很多话题,有女友的感觉,冲着女友感和甜美的可以直接拿下,穿的很性感,人也很配合。 【🔥值得打卡/回锅】:值得回锅 评分标准 6分为及格,7分为良品(考虑价格可以看一看),8分(值得价格并且建议体验),9分(实为该价位中少见的精品),10分(极品) 🍓永久ID @yajieVIP 🍓无法私信 @yajie18bot 👅成都选妃 🍓 全国大圈 🍓反馈报告 🍓全国包养
❤2
TG必备的搜索引擎,快搜kuai帮你发现有趣群组、频道、视频、音乐、电影、新闻 | Find cool stuff all in one bot! 机器人:@kuai @kuaia @kuaiaa 👉 https://t.me/kuaia?start=a_3RTFH2A
【🦄妹妹】:林艺 【💰价格】:27 【🐺狼友】:不留名 【😻长相评价】:9.5 【🫦身材评价】:9.5 【💋态度评价】:10 【👅服务评价】:9 【😍个人发挥】:妹妹很清纯,初恋脸,很淑女,说话声音超温柔,年龄小19岁,颜值高,资料拍丑了,也拍胖了,皮肤白,滑,有胸有臀,无风尘气,一双玉足,妹妹否认她是白虎,资料说的是白虎,不过的确毛少,几乎没有,另外户型不是一线天,是蝴蝶B,阴唇比较大,很会夹。整体来说妹妹比较青涩,服务基本不太会,但是给人感觉很舒服,就想温柔的口感绵密的酒,不是烈酒,妹妹不太会舌吻,但是吻的很认真,中途不玩手机,一直会和你聊天,但不是话痨那种,就想女朋友一样,我还捏了捏她的脸蛋。 美中不足就是腿上有一处纹身,个人不喜欢纹身,如果没纹身的话,就可以打满分了 目前在我心目中除了奶栗之外,她就是第二了,年龄还要比奶栗小两岁 因为要吃鲍鱼,所以订的头火,整体感觉鲍鱼没有传说的那么神,B也不是很粉,也没有香味,只能说…
❤4
模板样例,请参照填写: 【妹子花名】: 安禾 【验证留名】:xxxx 【验证时间】:5月9日 【所在位置】:上门 【修车水费】:25pp 【身高身材】:155 【妹子年龄】: 18 【湿度紧度昆度评分】: 9分,湿+紧,包裹感好 【颜值评分】:8分,妹子跟验证差不多,走可爱路线的。 【身材评分】:9分,小矮矮大奶奶 【态度机车评分】:10分,不机车,不玩手机,会主动聊天。 【女友感评分】:8分,不需要女友感 【服务评分】:8分,正常服务,今天妹子嘴上火痛没怎么🐍,嘴巴小喊不完,可以一直口,深喉不了,全程骚话一大堆,高潮人会发抖,敏感批。 【时间管理评分】:9分,不催钟。 【性价比评分】:9分。 【综合评分】:9分,去掉一个最高分一个最低分,取平均分 【优点缺点】:优点身材好、态度好、情绪反馈足,敏感批,妹妹学舞蹈的、柔韧性强、可以折叠日,学舞蹈人工白虎。缺点嫩妹,技术一般,需要指导。 【是否值得回锅】:是 【推荐程度】:9…
❤4👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @yajie1818. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“成都外围川蜀真实评价 丫姐严选” (@yajie1818), 6,339 subscribers as measured 30 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yajie1818.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.