Channel
@yadavi124
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,322subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001142048501 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @yadavi124 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2016 and 31 March 2020— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/yadavi124 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 04:57 | 2,322 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 06:41 | 2,323 | -4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:02 | 2,327 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:34 | 2,326 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 26 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
56 reactions across 10 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 32 | 57.1% | |
| 👍 | 17 | 30.4% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 3.57% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 3.57% | |
| 🤣 | 2 | 3.57% | |
| 🖕 | 1 | 1.79% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 56reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 26 December 2025 to 29 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
⭕️ نفی خانواده و ازدواج میشه این👇 میگه امروز تولد ۵۰ سالگی منه، نه همسری دارم، نه فرزندی، خودم کیک رو پختم {و خودم خواهم خورد} دخترها، گول فمینیست ها رو نخورید! اگه عاقل نباشید و زندگیتون رو درست نسازید، پنجاه سالگیتون میشه همین ... تنها، با کیکی که خودتون پختید و اشکهایی که دونه دونه روش سرازیر میشه! #خانواده ┏━━ °•🖌•°━━┓ @jahad_tabein ┗━━ °•🖌•°━━┛
👍2🤣2🖕1😁1
مولای یا مولای.... #استادفرج_قاسمی 💌کانال اعمال یداوی رحیق/استاد فرج قاسمی https://eitaa.com/joinchat/1759838228Cbcd844697c
❤1👍1
مناجات مسجد کوفه تا تهش ببین
❤7👍1
پزشکان دلسوزی که به عمق فاجعه واکسن اعتراف میکنن کجا و خرافه پرستانی که واکسن را بت کرده اند. 💌کانال اعمال یداوی رحیق/استاد فرج قاسمی https://eitaa.com/joinchat/1759838228Cbcd844697c
👏2
بی بی سی : موضوعی به نام طب اسلامی نداریم!!! 👇👇👇 🌍دیدگاه علمای بزرگ عالم تشیع درباره طب اسلامی 🖼علامه حلی رحمه الله علیه : غذاها و داروها سودمند و زیانمند با عقل درک نمی شود و با بعثت انبیا این فایده حاصل میشود. 🖼شیخ مفید رحمه الله علیه : طب دانشی صحیح است که راه دستیابی به آن، وحی و از طریق سمع و توقیف است. 🖼شیخ صدوق رحمه الله علیه : عقیده ما دربارهی اخبار و احادیث رسیده در طب، برچندگونه است و باید پس از بررسی …
قبرستان وادی السلام
❤10
حرم امام کاظم علیه السلام دعاگوی شما
❤11
💢 #شلغم خوردنیِ بسیار عالی و پر خاصیت... 👈بیماریهای زمستان را با چه درمان کنم؟! #شلغم پیامبر خدا (صلّیاللهعلیهوآله): 🔸خوردن #شلغم در فصل خودش، هر دردی را از بین میبرد 📚 محاسن ج۲، ص۳۳۳ 🔸از امام کاظم(علیه السلام) پرسیده شد که شلغم را خام بخوریم یا پخته؟ امام علیهالسلام فرمودند: هر دو. 📚 طب الأئمة ج۱ ص۱۰۵ 🔻علم ژنتیک جدید به مفهومی رسیده به نام اپیژنتیک 👈🏻 اپیژنتیک میگوید: 🔻ژنها ثابتاند، اما فعال یا خاموش …
👍2❤1
Photo, posted without a caption
شبکه خبر اعلام کرد در آمریکا واکسیناسیون نوزادان منع شده خواستم این خبر خوش را به همکاران خود اطلاع رسانی کنم
👍8
پنج سال فرستادنش زندان ؛ میدونید برای چی؟! برای اینکه تونسته بود سرطان خودش رو با هستهء زردآلو درمان کنه . ارزشمندترین کانال #طب_اسلامی👇🏻 🌐طب الائمه الصادقین«استاد قاسمی» https://eitaa.com/joinchat/2700214775Cc35748b316
از سوئد اومده بود کربلا و از طیق پیج اومد برا تولگیری بعدش هم باکویی های عزیز
👍3❤1😁1
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @yadavi124. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 827,668 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“اعمال یداوی رحیق/فرج قاسمی” (@yadavi124), 2,322 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yadavi124.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.