почему у меня после этого отпуска ни одной веснушки на лице, а на животе у меня просто ярд веснушек? это норм вообще?

Channel
Яна sunctity
@yaaannyctity
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
203subscribers
+12 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001374629521 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @yaaannyctity |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 23 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 23 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/yaaannyctity |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 23 Aug 2026, 06:05 | 203 | +15 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 18:08 | 188 | -3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 12:00 | 191 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:07 | 191 | first reading |
Engagement
14 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 41.0%
- avg views ÷ 203 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 83.3
- 14 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 18.2%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 14
- of 14 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 14 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 14 (3 August 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,166 |
| Reactions total | 132 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 12:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 24s
- Average length
- 12s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
132 reactions across 8 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5341355658702758871 | 27 | 20.5% | |
| custom 5325686114768417515 | 26 | 19.7% | |
| custom 5325894004070439968 | 22 | 16.7% | |
| custom 5199549054203210595 | 21 | 15.9% | |
| custom 5291730150570868352 | 20 | 15.2% | |
| custom 5327920365345720987 | 6 | 4.55% | |
| custom 5210667560596413706 | 4 | 3.03% | |
| custom 5395701645130614620 | 4 | 3.03% | |
| custom 5307761189017635562 | 2 | 1.52% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 132reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 6
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 3
- of 14 we hold a reading for · 21%
- Most on one post
- 3
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @yaaannyctity. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 8 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
вот это я натворила вчера делов исполнительный комитет реально при исполнении
custom 53256861147684175154custom 53413556587027588713custom 53279203653457209872custom 52106675605964137061
кто не мой фанат, тот лох
custom 53256861147684175159custom 53413556587027588715custom 53258940040704399682
вы сегодня так ахуеете
блог рппшницы
те самые идеи в гипомании а вообще мой вес сейчас такой же, как в мои 17 лет, в целом все хайпово 😜😜😜
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 53957016451306146204custom 52106675605964137062custom 53077611890176355622
t.me/anonaskbot?start=user_sknqqqjfkl 😁😈
"бейбифейс с демонскими глазами"
ладно вот такие сообщения это как глоток воздуха, можно пока и без монако
custom 53413556587027588716custom 51995490542032105954custom 53279203653457209874
ненавижу работать, с моей внешностью мне нужно жить в монако
custom 53256861147684175157custom 51995490542032105954custom 53413556587027588714custom 52106675605964137061
сказали, что надо научиться выдерживать толерантность к неопределенности, таких хуевых советов за свои деньги я ещё не получала
custom 52917301505708683528
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @yaaannyctity. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Яна sunctity” (@yaaannyctity), 203 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yaaannyctity.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.