Channel
@xzz0758
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
280subscribers
+105 since we began measuring on 10 November 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003509135260 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @xzz0758 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 November 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/xzz0758 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Nov 2026, 00:50 | 280 | +105 |
| 10 Nov 2026, 19:22 | 175 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 6 November 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 14 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (6 November 2026 – 10 November 2026) |
| Views total | 3,151 |
| Reactions total | 2 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Nov 2026, 19:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
2 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 6 November 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 15 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🎰 小崽汁 半价 📮 参与条件： 🎫 加入-小崽汁频道 🎫 加入-北京 · 无忧说好评 🎫 加入-北京【无忧】活动榜单 🎫 加入-北京【无忧】绅士男群 └ 🎟️ 发言数大于 5 条 🎫 加入-北京【无忧】总榜老师 🎫 加入-北京【无忧】精选榜单 🎁 奖品内容： 💰️ 700 半价卷 × 1 ⚠️ 抽奖说明： 中奖者机器人会发送中奖信息 1、中奖7天内私信老师兑换，逾期作废。 2、需按时上提交作业 如有特殊情况，提前报备。 3、凡无故缺席、未提交作业，将取消后续资格。 4、无上课意向的兄弟，请勿抽奖。 🔋 人品加成：⚡️ 规则 📅 开奖日期：(北京时间) 2026年11月18日 12时00分00秒
休息了，可以预约明天
好评多多，，本人白又瘦类型 又粉又嫩，，喜欢我的哥哥可以预约哦
#小崽汁 频道链接：https://t.me/hahbj8/79163
#小崽汁 老师资料 ：https://t.me/bjdsja/7267 妥妥的嫩妹一个呀，她的颜值和照片一样美丽。口活让人惊喜，妹妹口没有齿感。下面敏感，出水多，女上可以摸胸，感受女友一般体验，后入和传教士体位的包裹感好，直至紧紧抱着输出。总体来说体验不错。因为第二次比较难出水 让我在无限刺激中发射，确实不枉此行。在休息过程中妹妹比较健谈，又会注意个人感受，个人觉得眼睛特别好看，如果是我女朋友就完美了。强烈推荐兄弟们，我肯定会返 🔔 课后联系 @jingbeiabot 可进 ✅ 内部群 一键关注·大圣探店群组 😬 @bj51dh
❤1
休息了，可以预约明天
丰台 小崽汁 参与费用：免费参与 参与条件 🪪 必须设置电报用户名 🎫 加入-北京 花满楼 男群 🎫 加入-北京 花满楼 🎫 加入-北京 花满楼 男群 💋 🎫 订阅-北京 花满楼 佳人榜 🎫 订阅-北京 花满楼 佳丽榜 🎫 订阅-北京花满楼导航 🎫 订阅-北京中小项 🎫 订阅-北京 群众观点 🔎 奖品内容 小崽汁 半价卷 × 1 份 中奖名额：1 位 每人限报 1 次 抽奖说明 💰️ 半价券 单P 实付700 × 1 参加活动遇到任何疑问 联系 @bopnp_bot 老师链接 https://t.me/acosb/17885 开奖安排 2026-11-12 19:59:59（北京时间） 自动开奖 点击下方按钮报名，查看参与详情。
❤1
#小崽汁 老师资料 ：https://t.me/bjdsja/7267 朝阳 小崽汁作业 嫩妹里口活算特别好，很舒服，插入后感觉相当紧，兄弟们 不开玩笑 是真的紧 上位主动揺了好一会，直到我自己说要后入，然后后入10分钟解决。整体感觉非常完美。主要是很配合，可以插到底，我的尺寸比较大，又紧又润，主要好润，很舒服，不是那种润滑剂的润，是真的水足。嫩妹里的天花板 🔔 课后联系 @jingbeiabot 可进 ✅ 内部群 一键关注·大圣探店群组 😬 @bj51dh
休息了，可以预约明天
Photo, posted without a caption
休息了，可以预约明天
#小崽汁 频道链接：https://t.me/hahbj8/79163
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @xzz0758. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“小崽汁频道” (@xzz0758), 280 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xzz0758.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.