Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Quotex Professor Trading

Channel

Quotex Professor Trading

@xyzbjvcjbk

On this record: Topic · Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

35,176subscribers

-26,526 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001535323410
TypeChannel
Username@xyzbjvcjbk
Description𝗗𝗔𝗜𝗟𝗬 40-50 𝗦𝗨𝗥𝗘𝗦𝗛𝗢𝗧 𝗦𝗜𝗚𝗡𝗔𝗟𝗦🚀 ✅🌷🌸𝗔ccuracy on TOP ✅🌷🌸 ✅🌷🌸✅🌷🌸✅🌷🌸✅🌷🌸 NON MTG SIGNAL ✅ PERSON SIGNAL ☎️ @professor1150
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 October 2026
Measurements held9
On Telegramt.me/xyzbjvcjbk

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 7 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 80% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Previous handles

@xyzbjvcjbk was previously reachable at these 2 handles, before switching to its current one. This says nothing about who or what answers at the old handle today — only that this channel no longer does.

@quotexprofessortradings
held 24 August 2026 – 24 August 2026
@tanishatradings
held 7 August 2026 – 7 August 2026

Growth

35,17688,65461,9157 August 2026 — 61,702 subscribers7 August 2026 — 61,702 subscribers7 August 2026 — 79,470 subscribers8 August 2026 — 88,654 subscribers24 August 2026 — 87,572 subscribers24 August 2026 — 87,572 subscribers25 August 2026 — 87,430 subscribers26 August 2026 — 86,720 subscribers7 October 2026 — 35,176 subscribers7 August 20267 October 2026
9 measurements spanning 61 days, net -26,526. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 27,154–96,676 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Oct 2026, 07:2235,176-51,544
26 Aug 2026, 09:1286,720-710
25 Aug 2026, 06:3787,430-142
24 Aug 2026, 13:1587,572no change
24 Aug 2026, 13:0187,572-1,082
8 Aug 2026, 23:0288,654+9,184
7 Aug 2026, 22:5679,470+17,768
7 Aug 2026, 06:0061,702no change
7 Aug 2026, 05:4961,702first reading

Engagement

170 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.123%
avg views ÷ 35,176 subscribers
Avg views / post
43.4
40 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.07%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
40
of 170 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 14 of 40 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 October 2026
Posts held170 (5 August 2026 – 7 October 2026)
Views total1,734
Reactions total20
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Oct 2026, 19:29 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈5,120
Videos
≈98
Links
≈611

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

39 reactions across 31 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1435.9%
👍1128.2%
🔥512.8%
💯410.3%
🙏37.69%
👌12.56%
🥰12.56%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 31 of the 170 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 39 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 170 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 7 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Oct 2026, 09:28 UTC33 views1 reactionsread 7 October 2026
Photo

market fall from our zone but setup changes by market . we will correct or some changes in next one or two days and also add more entry

👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 170 posts we hold for @xyzbjvcjbk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

𝗤𝗨𝗢𝗧𝗘𝗫 𝗧𝗥𝗔𝗗𝗜𝗡𝗚 𝗜𝗦𝗣
@tradingisp · 2,053
#1
Quotex Professor Trading
@professortradings · 32,016
#2
Quotex Trader Ishaa
@quotexTraderIshaa · 1,139
#3
MADMAX📈TRADING💸
@madmaxorwot · 3,185
#4
colegialasdetubarrio ORIGINAL 💋🥵
@samtradez · 465
#5
QUOTEX FREE SIGNALS🎯
@quotexfreesignals3 · 2,041
#6
Quotex Trader Lucky 🔱
@quotextraderlucky19 · 11,912
#7
QUOTEX ITM 🤴
@dailyITMforecast · 570
#8
𝐎𝐋𝐘𝐌𝐏 𝐓𝐑𝐀𝐃𝐄 𝐅𝐑𝐄𝐄 𝐒𝐈𝐆𝐍𝐀𝐋𝐒
@IndianTradersBoss · 2,558
#9
D × - Official Trading
@Dx_Official_Trading · 14,528
#10
Quotex compounding signal 💸💸💸
@viccmac · 6,535
#11
𝒀𝑶𝑶 𝑩𝑰𝑵𝑨𝑹𝒀 𝑻𝑹𝑨𝑫𝑰𝑵𝑮🚦
@Yoo_Binary_Trading · 5,690
#12
TECHNICAL HARSH🤑
@sureshotskingharsh · 10,448
#13
NON MTG BOT (QUOTEX)
@nonmtgbotsignals · 25,256
#14
𝐅𝐔𝐋𝐋 𝐓𝐈𝐌𝐄 𝐓𝐑𝐀𝐃𝐄𝐑😈
@ftt21 · 33,528 (as read 24 August 2026)
#15
Crypto World
@cryptoworld2307 · 1,353
#16
ELITE TRADING BANGLADESH ♤
@Legendary_Trading_Bangladesh · 10,935
#17
TANMAY TRADING
@tanmayoption · 10,085
#18
Quotex Guru🎯
@binarygurujii · 35,982
#19
Aashi Professional Trader
@Ashipower123 · 18,254
#20
Trader Milan Jain Official
@tradermilanjainofficial · 15,080
#21
Trade With Anmol
@TradeWithAnmol143 · 1,238
#22
🚀 𝗤𝘂𝗮𝗻𝘁𝘂𝗺 𝗦𝗶𝗴𝗻𝗮𝗹 🔮
@QuantumSignalNet · 12,683
#23
Trading With Bro Code
@tradingwithbrocode · 11,354
#24
KING OF QUOTEX
@kingtrader4342 · 3,334 (as read 24 August 2026)
#25
Rock Trade
@RockTrade01 · 3,614
#26
A2 Trader
@A2_Trader1 · 78,517
#27
QUOTEX AO VIVO
@M1_Quotex_Ao_Vivo · 4,663
#28
Quotex Compounding Signals📊💯
@quotexcompoundingsignals · 14,072
#29
QUOTEX KING TRADER
@magictrader7273 · 689
#30
Quotex Trading
@quoteX · 1,397,286
#31
Trading Gurru
@gurru0101 · 472
#32
Modern Trading 🧿
@ModernTradingReal · 126,757
#33
Milan Jain Official
@milanjainofficial · 134,589
#34
tradingviewpremiumfreebuy
@tradingviewpremiumfreebuy · 1,139
#35
𝗡𝗢𝗡-𝗠𝗧𝗚 𝗦𝗨𝗥𝗘𝗦𝗛𝗢𝗧 𝗧𝗥𝗔𝗗𝗘𝗥🏆
@non_mtg_binary · 14,225
#36
Hello Quotex
@Hello_Quotex · 11
#37
HIGH LEVEL TRADING🥇(HLT)
@Highleveltrading_07 · 1,069
#38
🔥SUCCESS SIGNALS 🔥
@successtrd · 1,804
#39
QUOTEX BUG SURESHOT
@quotexprofit_hub · 50,910
#40
Binomo King
@binomokingiuya · 116
#41
𝗠𝗢𝗥𝗧𝗔𝗥 𝗧𝗥𝗔𝗗𝗜𝗡𝗚🚦
@MORTAR_TRADING · 4,281
#42
𝐍𝐀𝐕𝐘𝐀 𝐓𝐑𝐀𝐃𝐈𝐍𝐆
@NavyaTrading0 · 2,717
#43
OLYMP TRADE ACCURATE SIGNALS🔥🔥
@olymptradebestsignals · 3,901
#44
Power Trading Official
@powertradingofficial · 3,542
#45
NON MTG SIGNALS BINARY 💸🤑🚀
@nonmtgfuture · 623
#46
ROCKET SHOOTER
@JRTOP77 · 5,406
#47
SK SURE SHOTS EXPERT
@sksureshoot · 10,395
#48
Dheera Trading
@DheeraTrading · 2,335
#49
𝗤𝗨𝗢𝗧𝗘𝗫 𝗕𝗨𝗚 𝗢𝗙𝗙𝗜𝗖𝗜𝗔𝗟
@QuotexBugSignal0 · 11,451
#50
HARSH BINOMO
@harshbinomosureshot · 713
#51
Hm Trader Quotex (Quotex VIP's Signals) 🤑
@hmtraderquotex · 969
#52
𝗤𝗨𝗢𝗧𝗘𝗫 𝗕𝗜𝗡𝗔𝗥𝗬 𝗕𝗢𝗧
@Quote_XBinaryBoT · 23,078
#53
MAXX ACCURACY - THE BEST BINARY SIGNALS GROUP
@maxxaccuracy · 1,231
#54
Rani Quotex
@Rani_Quotex · 32,471
#55
Trading - Sureshot only - QUOTEX/BINOMO/OLYMP TRADE/FOREX
@tradinggod123 · 5,559
#56
Trader J
@jomeir · 13,494
#57
Professor Forex Trading
@professorforex11 · 372
#58
TRADING LEGEND QTX
@realdeepwinner · 130,476
#59
༗ 𝐕𝐀𝐈𝐒𝐇𝐔 𝐓𝐑𝐀𝐃𝐈𝐍𝐆 | 𝐕𝐀𝐈𝐒𝐇𝐔
@powerprincetraderr · 2,492
#60
𝐃𝐌𝐅 𝐓𝐑𝐀𝐃𝐄𝐒
@M1Rtrading · 24,683
#61
Tradearn academy❤️
@tradearnoriginal · 16,686
#62
TRADING LEGEND F&O
@legend_of_trading · 159,958
#63
TR Trader 🔵
@trtrader2020 · 3,078
#64
𝐍𝐎𝐍 𝐌𝐓𝐆 𝐁𝐎𝐓 (𝐐𝐔𝐎𝐓𝐄𝐗)
@nonmtgquotexrobot · 2,101
#65
𝐇𝐄𝐋𝐏𝐈𝐍𝐆𝐓𝐑𝐀𝐃𝐄𝐑®™
@helpingtraderofficial · 7,349
#66
💀𝙌𝙐𝘼𝙉𝙏𝙐𝙈 𝘾𝙊𝙍𝙀🔮
@Qxsupportt · 2,594
#67
🔥HIGHLEVEL TRADING🔥
@tradewithakshay7 · 167
#68
𝐓𝐑𝐀𝐃𝐄𝐑 𝐎𝐅 𝐁𝐀𝐑𝐅𝐈
@trader_barfi · 5,988
#69

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 24 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Quotex Professor Trading
@professortradings · 32,016
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 24 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Quotex Professor Trading” (@xyzbjvcjbk), 35,176 subscribers as measured 7 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xyzbjvcjbk.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.