3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 199–212 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Aug 2026, 10:26
200
-10
10 Aug 2026, 04:11
210
no change
10 Aug 2026, 01:17
210
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 2 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
12.1%
avg views ÷ 200 subscribers
Avg views / post
24.2
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.89%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held
20 (2 July 2026 – 9 August 2026)
Views total
266
Reactions total
13
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
10 Aug 2026, 01:17 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
20 reactions across 18 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 95.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
19
95.0%
👍
1
5.00%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 20reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
⏳ 24 HOURS.
Tomorrow, the market opens.
🦏 XRHY brings Rhodium—one of the world’s rarest precious metals—on-chain, with 1 XRHY representing 1 mg of Rhodium.
🚀 XRHY / USDC GOES LIVE
📅 10 AUGUST 2026
🕛 12:00 PM UTC
This is more than a new trading pair.
It’s the beginning of Xylapay’s expansion into tokenized real-world assets—with $XYL remaining at the heart of the ecosystem.
24 hours. Then XRHY enters the market…
⏳ 48 HOURS.
We’re almost there.
On 10 August, the XRHY/USDC market goes live—bringing Xylapay’s Rhodium-backed Real World Asset to the blockchain.
🦏 XRHY 1 XRHY = 1 mg of Rhodium
⚡ Built within the Xylapay Ecosystem
💎 Backed by real-world value
🌐 Designed for the tokenized-asset economy
🚀 XRHY/USDC
📅 10 August 2026
🕛 12:00 PM UTC
Two days. Then the market opens.
🌐 xylapay.com
💬 t.me/xylapay
#XRHY #XYL #Xyla…
🦏 Why did we choose Rhodium?
Because the future of tokenized assets shouldn't be limited to what's familiar.
XRHY brings one of the world's rarest precious metals on-chain, where 1 XRHY = 1 mg of Rhodium.
⏳ 4 Days to Go
🚀 Trading Pair: XRHY/USDC
📅 10 August 2026
🕛 12:00 PM UTC
⚡ $XYL powers the Xylapay ecosystem.
🦏 XRHY is the first step in our Real World Asset journey.
The countdown is almost over.
🌐 xylapay.…
⏳ 6 Days to Go.
Some assets are valuable because they're popular.
Rhodium is valuable because it's rare. 🦏
On 10 August, XRHY/USDC goes live, bringing tokenized exposure to one of the world's rarest precious metals through the Xylapay Ecosystem.
XRHY
🔹 1 XRHY = 1 mg of Rhodium
🔹 Rhodium-backed Real World Asset (RWA)
🔹 Built within the Xylapay ecosystem
🚀 Trading Pair: XRHY/USDC
📅 10 August 2026
🕛 12:00 PM UTC
…
Every countdown leads to a moment.
This one leads to Rhodium.
🦏 XRHY brings one of the world's rarest precious metals to the blockchain.
⏳ 7 Days to Go
🚀 XRHY/USDC
📅 10 August 2026
🕛 12:00 PM UTC
The future of tokenized real-world assets starts here.
🌐 xylapay.com
💬 t.me/xylapay
#XRHY #XYL #Xylapay #RWA #Crypto
⏳ 9 Days to Go.
The countdown to XRHY/USDC has officially begun.
🦏 What is XRHY?
XRHY is Xylapay's Rhodium-backed Real World Asset (RWA) token, where 1 XRHY = 1 milligram of Rhodium—bringing transparent, fractional exposure to one of the world's rarest precious metals.
🚀 Trading Pair: XRHY/USDC
📅 Launch Date: 10 August 2026
🕛 Time: 12:00 PM UTC
⚡ $XYL remains the native token powering the Xylapay ecosystem.
🦏…
🚨 XRHY/USDC IS GOING LIVE 🚨
The next milestone for the Xylapay Ecosystem is almost here.
🦏 What is XRHY?
XRHY is Xylapay's Rhodium-backed Real World Asset (RWA) token, where 1 XRHY represents 1 milligram of Rhodium—bringing transparent, fractional exposure to one of the world's rarest precious metals through blockchain technology.
📈 Trading Pair
XRHY / USDC
📅 Launch Schedule
🗓️ 10 August 2026
🕛 12:00 PM UTC
🌐…
🚨 COMING SOON: XRHY/USDC 🚨
A new chapter begins for the Xylapay Ecosystem.
🦏 XRHY is bringing one of the world's rarest precious metals on-chain.
Why Rhodium?
🔹 One of the rarest precious metals on Earth
🔹 Essential across high-value industrial applications
🔹 Limited global supply
🔹 Now available through blockchain technology
While $XYL continues to power the Xylapay ecosystem, XRHY expands our vision into token…
Most people have never heard of Rhodium.
That's the point.
Rarer than gold. Harder to find. Impossible to replicate. The world's most precious metal sitting quietly outside the noise of markets and speculation for centuries.
We've been thinking about what belongs inside the Xylapay ecosystem alongside $XYL.
Something that moves. And something that holds.
Coming soon.
🌐 Website: xylapay.com
💬 Community: t.me/xyl…
In 1973 the world agreed on a system to move money across borders.
SWIFT.
189 countries. Trillions of dollars. The backbone of global finance.
It still takes 3 days.
It still charges $40.
It still asks you to fill out the same forms your grandfather filled out.
52 years and nobody touched it.
Not because it worked.
Because the people it didn't work for had no alternative.
Now they do.
🌐 Website: xylapay.com
💬…
Something I don't think people fully realize yet.
The value of $XYL was never meant to come from hype.
It comes from solving a real problem.
Every new user.
Every transaction.
Every milestone.
Every step toward making global payments simpler.
That's how ecosystems are built.
Price follows attention.
Long-term value follows utility.
We're focused on utility.
The rest will take care of itself.
🌐 Website: xylapa…
Something I've never said publicly before.
The hardest part of building Xylapay wasn't the technology. Solana made the technical part possible. Smart people figured out the hard problems.
The hardest part was convincing myself that a $1 fee was actually enough. That we didn't need to charge more to survive. That the whole model could hold.
It holds.
And every time someone sends money home and their family gets it…
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @xylapay. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,048,229 of 1,563,849entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“XylaFi Token ( $XYL )” (@xylapay), 200 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xylapay.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.