Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 全网最强博彩色料洗资

Channel

全网最强博彩色料洗资

@xxzzpf

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

13subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003463800429
TypeChannel
Username@xxzzpf
Description柬埔寨博彩色料小额 盘口直营放料公群 赌资博彩色料料 点位低 无任何风险 为PG平台色播平台洗资,博彩色料洗资(本群支持收款码结账)注:新人做单两组数据起为一单! 如回款之后有被封禁冻结的情况下联系业务员进行1✖️3的赔付(24小时之内)老板们做单前看好群置顶与公告🪧 唯一老板业务员: https://t.me/TZPFN 如有群里人私信你做单被骗概不负责!
Created22 November 2025measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/xxzzpf

Growth

137 August 2026 — 13 subscribers12 August 2026 — 13 subscribers7 August 202612 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 4 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12–14 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 03:1613no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:5313first reading

Engagement

6 posts held, back to 22 November 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
4
Videos
1
Links
2

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
7s
Average length
7s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

22 Nov 2025, 07:56 UTC286 viewsread 12 August 2026

今天早上小弟做单记录 客服 @kefu366 公群 https://t.me/+QIEq25SCrk4wZjE8

22 Nov 2025, 07:41 UTC317 viewsread 12 August 2026

😃飞机做单 日3000+ 无风险业务 不要你任何资料,无任何风险项目

22 Nov 2025, 07:32 UTC197 viewsread 12 August 2026

土豆上压 8000u公群 有收款码的来做单 薪资说明:每天都有1-5k左右收入 😃只要你有收款码就可以做单 😃 每天1000以上利润,不够客服补你 😃 项目无任何风险给PG电子色播平台洗资 做单客服列表 认准唯一客服 @kefu366 资金来往以及结账记录 认准唯一频道 @xxedbc 土豆上压8000u公群链接 https://t.me/+QIEq25SCrk4wZjE8

Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @xxzzpf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“全网最强博彩色料洗资” (@xxzzpf), 13 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xxzzpf.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.