Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

дневники пикси 𓃠۶ৎ

@xxpilm

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,062subscribers

-17 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001826157642
TypeChannel
Username@xxpilm
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/xxpilm

Growth

3,0623,0793,070.57 August 2026 — 3,079 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,079 subscribers8 August 2026 — 3,073 subscribers11 August 2026 — 3,068 subscribers14 August 2026 — 3,062 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net -17. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,059–3,082 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 04:483,062-6
11 Aug 2026, 07:313,068-5
8 Aug 2026, 05:213,073-6
7 Aug 2026, 13:313,079no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:503,079first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.25%
avg views ÷ 3,062 subscribers
Avg views / post
222
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
28.3%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 9 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held9 (31 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total1,998
Reactions total566
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 23:59 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

566 reactions across 9 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 527832608162609039116729.5%
custom 536167977465993051214826.1%
custom 537316806055746662913223.3%
custom 54337885947727990919817.3%
custom 5370846991511233268213.71%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 566reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
11.1%
1 of 9 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
240
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
220
over 8 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2W5zFHPtZEy12 August 20262 August 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 10:01 UTC103 views57 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🌸🌸Последнее время ✨✨активно залипаю в ✨✨Threads, и мне постоянно попадаются девчонки, читающие классику. 🤎🤎Это так вдохновило! Не могли бы вы порекомендовать что-нибудь стоящее? А у мифа скидки на классику, это знак ?

custom 543378859477279909118custom 527832608162609039117custom 536167977465993051217custom 53731680605574666295

6 Aug 2026, 09:14 UTC193 views51 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

GIRLSSSSS :: ⋆.˚✮🔈✮˚.⋆ 🌟🌟Вышел постер 🌟🌟экранизации «Гипотезы любви» Али Хейзелвуд. Фильм выходит уже 23 сентября

custom 527832608162609039114custom 537316806055746662914custom 543378859477279909114custom 53616797746599305129

5 Aug 2026, 03:46 UTC223 views99 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤩🤩🤩вчера тикток меня 🤩🤩проклял, поэтому кидаю вам: #линавинчестер #анавалери #альваморис

custom 537316806055746662930custom 527832608162609039129custom 536167977465993051228custom 543378859477279909110custom 53708469915112332682

4 Aug 2026, 17:42 UTC220 views47 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤩срочный сбор; 🤩🤩🤩🤩что читаем дальше ?

custom 536167977465993051217custom 527832608162609039113custom 537316806055746662911custom 54337885947727990915custom 53708469915112332681

4 Aug 2026, 14:03 UTC217 views108 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🎧🪨🪷🧦🪷прочитанное за июль ⭐️Игра в неведимку от Альвы Морис ⭐️Эндшпиль от Камилы Соколовой ⭐️на третьей недели - начала читать 3 книги, так и не дочитала. ⭐️«между строк» и «перейти черту» от Колин Гувер в итоге ~ оказывается, получилось 4 книги, но я всем сказала 3! Сколько получилось у вас? делитесь фотографиями книг!🪷🪨

custom 527832608162609039130custom 537316806055746662930custom 536167977465993051229custom 537084699151123326816custom 54337885947727990913

4 Aug 2026, 03:00 UTC235 views39 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

girls&boys….., вчера увидела тикток про расставание медийной пары, и прям сердце сжалось. 🫥 🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩Он страдает, у 🤩🤩🤩неё новый, но всё равно он первый прибегает решать её проблемы. Было ясно, что отношения нездоровые, поэтому и не сложилось. Понятно, что мы видим лишь обложку, а не всю подноготную, но они выглядели ну очень красиво. 🤩🤩🤩Сидела, смотрела их 🤩🤩🤩эдиты и посты в тг, и 🤩🤩🤩теперь захотелось 🤩🤩🤩прочитат

custom 527832608162609039111custom 537316806055746662911custom 536167977465993051210custom 54337885947727990915custom 53708469915112332682

3 Aug 2026, 17:01 UTC230 views28 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @bookishlands

Если честно, так хочется уже, чтобы отстали от актеров, которых сейчас выбирают на роли в экранизации любимых романов… Уже и Дэвиду Яконо досталось за то, что его выбрали на роль Уэса в Better That the Movies, хотя его выбрала автор! По-моему, экранизация «Вне кампуса» уже показала, что главное не внешность, а талант актера. Но людям лишь бы похейтить кого-то (истинные фанаты так делать не будут, кстати)😒 Пора пере

custom 527832608162609039110custom 53731680605574666298custom 53616797746599305125custom 54337885947727990915

2 Aug 2026, 04:10 UTC240 views25 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Advertisementerid 2W5zFHPtZEyForwarded from @eksmofreedomrussiaPhoto

☀️Летние новеллы от Софи Анри, Эмилии Грин и Айли Фриман в игровом формате! Совместно с платформой MakeOn мы адаптировали несколько эпизодов из наших книг для интерактивного чтения! 💻❤️ Теперь можно не только читать историю, но и стать ее частью: ⭐️Делать выбор; ⭐️Общаться с героями; ⭐️Развивать отношения; ⭐️Почувствовать себя главным героем. 🎁 А при успешном прохождении в самом конце вас ждет приятный бонус. Гот

custom 52783260816260903919custom 53616797746599305128custom 53731680605574666295custom 54337885947727990913

31 Jul 2026, 16:58 UTC337 views112 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🧡🧡🧡❤️Начала читать 🧡🧡🧡«Искру» Ребекки Яррос. Книга очень миниатюрная, похожа по размерам на новеллы от других издательств. 💗💗💗Девочки из 💗💗💗@not_love_story 💗💗💗даже бинго сделали (покажу в комментах). О чём: Себастьян исчез после пожара 10 лет назад, оставив Эмерсон. Теперь он вернулся, чтобы восстановить пожарный отряд, и её мир снова перевернулся и стал в огне 😏 Читали Яррос?Какая у вас любимая книга?

custom 543378859477279909135custom 527832608162609039134custom 536167977465993051225custom 537316806055746662918

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @xxpilm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,011,078 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“дневники пикси 𓃠۶ৎ” (@xxpilm), 3,062 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xxpilm.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.