Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for أبجديّة

Channel

أبجديّة

@xxixxil

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

2,534subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 19 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001458480595
TypeChannel
Username@xxixxil
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded19 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/xxixxil

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

2,5312,5362,533.519 August 2026 — 2,532 subscribers20 August 2026 — 2,533 subscribers24 August 2026 — 2,534 subscribers27 August 2026 — 2,533 subscribers30 August 2026 — 2,535 subscribers2 September 2026 — 2,536 subscribers7 September 2026 — 2,534 subscribers11 September 2026 — 2,535 subscribers15 September 2026 — 2,531 subscribers19 September 2026 — 2,534 subscribers2,53419 August 202619 September 2026
10 measurements spanning 32 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,530–2,537 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 16:592,534+3
15 Sept 2026, 15:562,531-4
11 Sept 2026, 15:212,535+1
7 Sept 2026, 02:142,534-2
2 Sept 2026, 10:332,536+1
30 Aug 2026, 11:452,535+2
27 Aug 2026, 06:032,533-1
24 Aug 2026, 04:342,534+1
20 Aug 2026, 02:082,533+1
19 Aug 2026, 04:152,532first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 30 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

138 reactions across 19 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
138100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 138 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 April 2026 to 18 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @xxixxil. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 April 2026 to 18 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

18 Aug 2026, 23:10 UTC55 viewsread 19 August 2026

‏«أتحرى عوضك يارب، عوضٌ لا أعلم مداه، ولا أتقن حجم تدبيره، لكني أؤمن به كيفما جاء»

11 Aug 2026, 01:10 UTC279 views7 reactionsread 19 August 2026

اللهم إنا نسألك الهدى والتقى والعفاف والغنى والفوز بالجنة والنجاة من النار

7

9 Aug 2026, 14:50 UTC371 views3 reactionsread 19 August 2026

‏«وإني أحذرك من الحماسة في الرأي، والتعجّل في المحبّة، فإن النّفس إن حملتها على ما تريد، أودت بك، وإن الإفراط لا مأمن له، فاتّق شرّ نفسك بنفسك»

3

1 Aug 2026, 16:37 UTC768 views5 reactionsread 19 August 2026

‏«أيّ امرأةٍ -غيركِ أنتِ- عاشت قسوة أيامك وصارت رُغم القسوةِ أنعَم؟»

5

28 Jul 2026, 14:27 UTC855 views9 reactionsread 19 August 2026

‏واليوم أخطو برفقٍ أكثر، بعد أن ركضت لوقت طويل خوفًا من أن يفوتني شيء، وفاتني كل شيء ‏— محمود درويش

9

30 Jun 2026, 12:28 UTC≈1,270 views10 reactionsread 19 August 2026

‏يا واسع الرحمة أنتَ الصاحبُ في سفر الحياة، يسّر لنا الخير فيها، واطوِ عنا بُعد الغايات، وسلّمنا من الأذى، واحفظ علينا الأهل والصحبة

10

26 Jun 2026, 11:54 UTC≈1,400 views10 reactionsread 19 August 2026

‏أعرف بأنّك بذلت ما بوسعك للبدءِ من جديد، أفهم المسافة التي تقف مثل جرحٍ لا يلتئم بينك وبين ما تريد، أعرف أيضًا ضبابية الرّغبة، أن تمد يدك لتمسك شيئًا ما، أيّ شيء.. ثم يفلت من بين أصابعك مرةً أخرى، أتفهم هذه المحاولات بالتّمسك في غصنٍ تتمنى أن لا ينكسر رغم عنف قبضتك عليه.

10

24 Jun 2026, 01:48 UTC≈1,360 views7 reactionsread 19 August 2026

‏ولعلني ككل الذين عاشوا على فتات العمر في بلدانهم رتبت الخيال على السنين والخيبات، ومجّدت اليقين المؤجل والسعادة فيما لا نجد وما لا يمكن اقتناصه.

7

11 Jun 2026, 12:39 UTC≈1,650 views4 reactions1 Starread 19 August 2026

‏هُناك دائمًا يدٌ ‏لولا انتباههَا نموت. ‏- مريد البرغوثي

4

4 Jun 2026, 20:30 UTC≈1,770 views9 reactionsread 19 August 2026

‏وقَد تبدو سعيدًا ‏كلَّ يومٍ ‏وفي أعماقِكَ الشيءُ النقيضُ ‏يَلُفُّ الليلُ دربَكَ.. ‏أينَ تَمضي؟ ‏ولا نورٌ يَشُعُّ ولا وَمِيضُ!

9

3 Jun 2026, 12:11 UTC≈3,550 views6 reactionsread 19 August 2026

‏«لم أكن قبل لقياك أعلم أنَّ في الأرض كل هذا السرور»

6

27 May 2026, 08:09 UTC≈3,820 views8 reactionsread 19 August 2026

لا غيّب الله عنّا وعنكم فرحًا منشؤه العيد ولونه الألفة وامتداده المحبّة، لا غيب الله عنّا وعنكم عيدًا زهوه الأحبّة ودفئه اجتماعهم وتوكيده وصلهم وعوده قربهم.

8

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @xxixxil. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ربّما أنا.
@MIIMIIIM · 37,902
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 31 August 2026
ذاتّ.
@aa02t · 27,154
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 11 September 2026
تَفرُد
@H11_I · 27,100
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 11 September 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“أبجديّة” (@xxixxil), 2,534 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xxixxil.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.