Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

NFT @xuejiang 血浆 学讲

@xuejiang

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002941803601
TypeChannel
Username@xuejiang
Description官网一口价,喜欢的直接拍。 更多🆔用户名 @tg8tg 频道。 用usdt购买联系 @ganjiang 36#
Created29 August 2025measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded14 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/xuejiang

Growth

212 August 2026 — 2 subscribers14 August 2026 — 2 subscribers12 August 202614 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1–3 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 07:312no change
12 Aug 2026, 16:312first reading

Engagement

6 posts held, back to 29 August 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
2
Links
2

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Recent posts

23 Sept 2025, 00:45 UTC41 viewsread 14 August 2026

https://fragment.com/username/@xuejiang 😢 @xuejiang 血浆 学讲

23 Sept 2025, 00:44 UTC33 viewsread 14 August 2026
Photo

NFT 官网一口价,喜欢的直接拍。🧧 更多nft用户名 @tg8tg 🇸🇰 NFT列表: 1- 2- 3- 4- 5- 6- 7- 8- 9- 10- 11- 12- 13- 14- 15- 16- 17- 18- 19- 20- usdt 购买联系 @ganjiang 干将

23 Sept 2025, 00:43 UTC37 viewsread 14 August 2026

用户名nft出售列表(8) 😢NFT @guanlan 观澜(深圳) 😢NFT @yuangao 原稿 原告 😢NFT @digao 底稿 迪高 😢NFT @qiage 恰哥 七阿哥 😢NFT @zangge 藏哥 😢NFT @zangxing 藏星 脏性 😢NFT @linjiao 麟角 林娇 😢NFT @bingliao 冰疗 😢NFT @xiangquan 项圈 香圈 😢NFT @rouduo 柔朵 肉多 😢NFT @rouwo 肉我 😢NFT @woqie 我切 😢NFT @huanwo 环沃 幻我 😢NFT @senlan 森蓝 @senyuan 森源 😢NFT @wanchou 万筹 😢NFT @shuhao 书豪 书号 😢N

Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @xuejiang. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 55 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“NFT @xuejiang 血浆 学讲” (@xuejiang), 2 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xuejiang.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.