Channel
@xuehuacfm
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
908subscribers
+674 since we began measuring on 17 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003994366186 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @xuehuacfm |
| Created | 29 April 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 17 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/xuehuacfm |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 19:48 | 908 | +674 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 10:15 | 234 | no change |
| 17 Aug 2026, 10:00 | 234 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 29 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 3 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 7 (29 April 2026 – 17 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,293 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 17 Aug 2026, 10:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
9 reactions across 3 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🍌 | 3 | 33.3% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 33.3% | |
| 💩 | 2 | 22.2% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 11.1% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 29 April 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🩵雪花X新版本更新 🏷版本号: 3.5.040 ⬇️下载地址: https://pan.quark.cn/s/1537d48185f2 🗃更新内容 ✅适配安卓17 ✅优化解密漏人 ❗️游戏分为三层加密 : 🔨坐标pawn 🔨骨骼Transformer 🔨阵营信息Playinfo 不同玩家遇到的是不一样的加密等级，目前坐标加密基本没有问题，骨骼加密顶多也就闪一下，大部分问题都来自于阵营加密，例如:绘制队友 没有这类的账号 无法进行修复，我只能修复遇到的问题
🪐cfm 解密内核 ♾公益雪花X_3.5.028 👀👀👀 ✅修复自瞄溢出框外的问题 ✅修复判定未加密后进入对局初始化时，后台的坐标加密检测重置为导致标签为检测中 ✅模型漏打 ✅外部模拟执行解密 ✅框内漏打 ✅内核陀螺仪自瞄 ✅隐藏进程 ✅隐藏路径 ✅隐藏GPU节点 🛜RT有缓 🛜pd驱动 🛜林羽驱动 💙稳定性说明 ⭐️卡密随便输入 ✅代码由✨生成:仅安全研究行为，无任何收费方式，也不进行任何收费，请注意防骗 反馈问题请在诊断页导出诊断报告，导出后上传并说明大致问题即可。没报告请勿反馈 🩵更新频道 @xuehuabox 👥qq组队群 上一个版本虽然是bug，但是用着自瞄还挺牛逼的，有需要强锁自瞄的，可以使用上一个版本。
❤1
近期又有新一批账号被处以十年封禁。 CFM 与多数游戏不同：并非秒封，而是在特定时间段内出现大批量封禁（随机检测）。 无论是六花、嗯嗯、DRA、柚子猫，还是此前的 ibox、VIA 等辅助，均存在同样的问题，可见封禁与所使用的辅助本身无关。 就举报封禁而言，除 6.6 与 6.12 相对稳定外，其余版本均存在风险。经询问大量十年封禁用户，被封账号绝大多数符合以下特征： 内核 6.1 及以下，使用 RT 驱动； 6 系以下，使用断点或内存类功能（非 CFM 的断点同样计入）。 其余情况均面临被加密、追封十年的风险（原因未知，属随机检测）。 如果你是第一次接触 CFM 辅助，建议通读全文的稳定性说明。 最后澄清关于"内存解密"的传言：若辅助真是直接修改内存，其一，不会存在各种各样的bug，而是直接通杀解密。其二，若因解密拉闸应该是所有人同时拉闸，不会存在有人稳定，有人拉闸，应被全面封杀。 事实上，各类基于模拟执行的解密方案都可能出…
@xuehuadaili
💩2
💙稳定性说明 从去年开始就有解密拉闸，即使完全不动内存也会拉闸。这个检测还没人搞懂，有的人拉有的人不拉，只能推测6系稍微安全一点。 ✏️建议：6.6/6.12放心玩；6.1不要用rt驱动，其他驱动玩；6.1以下不要使用解密。 🏷 封号说明： ✏️ 24小时环境异常 游戏特有的举报检测机制。即使手搓，被举报过多也会触发，与辅助无关。一般先要求人脸，人脸后建议至少隔5小时再打，否则再被举报就会环境异常24小时。 ✏️3/7天环境异常 自身环境较差，或曾使用断点子追/内存功能。建议排查乱七八糟的模块，尤其是修改系统的行为。 6.1内核请勿使用rt驱动，否则环境异常7天。 目前程序已验证自身稳定性，仍有问题请自行排查。 被举报后，后台会加强对你手机设备的审查，包括环境、历史封号记录、设备状态等。检测软件看到的环境和游戏环境没有直接关系，只能作参考。加密后审查翻倍，过不了就封7天；过关一般弹人脸+坐标加密。 坐标加密后不建议继续使用，…
🍌3👍3
原15w人公益频道无故被封 新频道 @aadaili 分享公益资源 解决电报信息差 防止被圈 ✔️通用游戏环境隐藏教程 (橘子闲鱼同款) ✔️全游戏拉闸后清理教程 (阿灵同款) ✔️通用过TG频道验证大全 (最强整合) 🟢王者荣耀裸奔解密公益分享 •嗯嗯通杀解密 •天理算法 •泪心国服 •独久王者 •apple共享 •孤独解密 🟢和平•长期公益项目分享 •葫芦娃 •落叶 •嗯嗯 •橘子 •LV和平 •A内核 •DY子追 •比翼鸟:衍生 •星光兽 •ZERO •谢幕美化 🟢暗区使命高能三角洲cfm萤火lolm等 •小雪三角洲 •嗯嗯cfm解密 •污青萤火 •ACC暗区 •高能英雄 •lolm 汇聚各种游戏:子追 范围 美化 超广角 弱网 清理残留 XP框架 面具模块 直装 改文件等等 ⭐️点击加入新频道: https://t.me/aadaili
Channel created
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @xuehuacfm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,282,191 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“雪花X” (@xuehuacfm), 908 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xuehuacfm.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.