Channel
@xue123er5
On this record: Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1subscribers
-106 since we began measuring on 17 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004360256899 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @xue123er5 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 15 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 17 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/xue123er5 |
@xue123er5 was previously reachable at this handle, before switching to its current one. This says nothing about who or what answers at the old handle today — only that this channel no longer does.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Aug 2026, 16:56 | 1 | -146 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 22:34 | 147 | +40 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 23:15 | 107 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 15 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 10 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 14 (15 August 2026 – 17 August 2026) |
| Views total | 3,872 |
| Reactions total | 5 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 17 Aug 2026, 23:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
5 reactions across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 5 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 15 August 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
【嫩妹报告】https://telegram.me/GZNMHEJI 【老师艺名】#小雪 【联系方式】】@djsnznsj123 【所在位置】天河 【验证留名】哇呜哇 【验证时间】2026年8月17日 【修车费用】600p 【颜值身材】很嫩有點肉感但不胖 【服务内容】 【服务态度】非常好 【优点缺点】 优点：可愛的娃娃面！喜欢她下面天然有点稀疏没长齐的毛，稍微刺激一下很快就进入状态而且越插越湿。 十分听话配合，能一起享受。 胸是天然的C，抱着有点肉感很舒服。 天然黑发没有纹身，弥补了初恋的遗憾。 缺点： 虽然妹妹有抽烟，但房间通风较好，基本上闻不到烟味。 【推荐程度】8 【体验细节】 一开始找不到课室入口，迟到了打乱妹妹食饭的安排很不好意思。 还好妹妹很有耐心地遥控我找到入口。 开门后第一反应是：“这么年轻合法吗？” 确认年龄合法后，便按奈不住上下其手。 刺激了下边大概2-3分钟便进入状态。 刚插入便感受到妹妹下面收缩了几下，她…
雪儿的频道 pinned a photo
地区：#天河 艺名：小雪 验证：视频报日期验证 课表：600/1 TG ：@djsnznsj123 标签：#嫩妹 #制服 #鸳鸯浴 #69 #蛇吻 PS：课后请在下方评论反馈 👍报告撰稿 🗣加入白嫖 👉点此预约下海小雪 报告奖励200 分
雪儿的频道 pinned «https://t.me/Gzffol/42572»
https://t.me/Gzffol/42572
【嫩妹报告】https://telegram.me/GZNMHEJI 【老师艺名】雪 【联系方式】@djsnznsj123 【所在位置】天河区 【验证留名】kis 【验证时间】8.17 【修车费用】1200pp 【颜值身材】9分 【服务内容】课表服务 【服务态度】性格很好 【优点缺点】新人，蛇，听话 【推荐程度】值得推荐 【体验细节】今天闲暇时间趁机放松了下，群里寻觅良久，最终找到了小雪老师，正好赶上了老师的档期，挺招人喜欢的，身材很棒，性格很好，屁股又翘又弹，手感一级棒。三点粉，很爱出水儿，干的得床单湿一片，配合度拉满，有求必应。陪洗+亲咪咪+口+花式调情全套下来，节奏掌握得死死的，前戏丝袜情趣玩得我差点没忍住，赶紧进去，没几分钟，直接出来了，第二炮才扬我雄威。态度积极，技术在线，完全没有敷衍，80分钟真枪实弹干得爽翻，第一次都很快，全看第二次，还是得PP才有体验感。自带课室进出方便，也非常安全！下次还会来。 ♥️温馨提示:…
现在有空要过来的宝子们私我啊🤪
Messages in this channel will no longer be automatically deleted
Messages in this channel will be automatically deleted after 1 month
【嫩妹报告】https://telegram.me/GZNMHEJI 【老师艺名】#小雪 【联系方式】@djsnznsj123 【所在位置】天河 【验证留名】可乐 【验证时间】2026年8月15日 【修车费用】600P 【颜值身材】人照八成。真人脸没那么长，带点娃娃脸，显得很嫩。身材匀称，很顶。 【服务内容】XCZ，舌吻， 【服务态度】非常热情 【优点缺点】优点：听话，指那打那。性格开朗活泼，亲切感强。身材匀称三点粉，胸B-C之间，少女胸手感好。全身皮肤白滑手感好，没纹身。做爰反馈好，屌感好，会迎合。叫声自然不造作，口技很不错，吹的很舒服。 缺点：妹妹有抽烟，稍微有一点点小肚子（但绝不影响观感）嫩妹服务会的不多，需调教。卫生间很小。 【推荐程度】8.5（这个价位以身材颜值来说，可以直接冲。纯个人出击见解） 【体验细节】见有合眼缘的老师就直接约了。课室在著名的网红景点，方便停车。去做工兵之前，本来就抱着人照差太多就掉头走的心态…
❤5
天河宝子们
https://t.me/GZNMMTB/81151
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @xue123er5. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“全国包养萝莉/处女/学妹（广告频道）” (@xue123er5), 1 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xue123er5.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.