Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 零龙资源分享(三角形PUBG和平无畏契约王者荣耀)

Channel

零龙资源分享(三角形PUBG和平无畏契约王者荣耀)

@xubaiwj

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

10,451subscribers

-2,193 since we began measuring on 19 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002869300747
TypeChannel
Username@xubaiwj
Created14 July 2025measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded19 August 2026
Last confirmed live2 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 2 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/xubaiwj

Growth

10,45112,64511,54819 August 2026 — 12,644 subscribers20 August 2026 — 12,645 subscribers21 August 2026 — 12,644 subscribers22 August 2026 — 12,305 subscribers24 August 2026 — 12,071 subscribers25 August 2026 — 11,878 subscribers26 August 2026 — 11,537 subscribers27 August 2026 — 11,388 subscribers28 August 2026 — 11,270 subscribers29 August 2026 — 11,058 subscribers30 August 2026 — 10,836 subscribers31 August 2026 — 10,795 subscribers1 September 2026 — 10,638 subscribers2 September 2026 — 10,451 subscribers19 August 20262 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 14 days, net -2,193. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,122–12,974 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
2 Sept 2026, 09:5310,451-187
1 Sept 2026, 09:4410,638-157
31 Aug 2026, 08:0710,795-41
30 Aug 2026, 10:4410,836-222
29 Aug 2026, 11:3611,058-212
28 Aug 2026, 10:0311,270-118
27 Aug 2026, 08:3711,388-149
26 Aug 2026, 11:1211,537-341
25 Aug 2026, 09:5411,878-193
24 Aug 2026, 07:0412,071-234
22 Aug 2026, 18:1712,305-339
21 Aug 2026, 05:1412,644-1
20 Aug 2026, 06:2212,645+1
19 Aug 2026, 20:1512,644first reading

Engagement

95 posts held, back to 14 July 2025the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 23 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.02%
avg views ÷ 10,451 subscribers
Avg views / post
316
80 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.926%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
80
of 95 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 63 of 80 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026
Posts held95 (14 July 20251 September 2026)
Views total25,285
Reactions total228
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken1 Sept 2026, 20:41 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
5m 24s
Average length
36s

Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

299 reactions across 66 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 76.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍23076.9%
3812.7%
😁82.68%
😱82.68%
🤯82.68%
💔31.00%
🤔20.669%
😡10.334%
🥰10.334%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 76 of the 95 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 299 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 95 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2025 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Sept 2026, 03:48 UTC16 viewsread 1 September 2026

今天我整合了挂圈各大热门频道! 以下频道是挂圈热门频道大合集 1️⃣小雾改文件 2️⃣小月改文件. 3️⃣落雾改文件. 4️⃣公益内核破解. 5️⃣TG高速公益代理. 6️⃣杰斯三角洲改文件. 7️⃣CC公益端口. 8️⃣期九期改文件. 9️⃣光头强公益内核. 互推日进百人 参加联系 @yihou 参加互推要求:10k+ ------------------------------------- 点我一键加入全部频道😊 点我一键加入全部频道😊 点我一键加入全部频道😊

Signed 频道主

31 Aug 2026, 09:40 UTC169 views3 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Video

无畏契约古龙公益内核[装载机] 1️⃣更新枪械武器美化 2️⃣修复Wawa自瞄特征 3️⃣解决某些闪退特征 4️⃣更新程序流畅度 5️⃣修复UDP解密防录屏 👊免费卡密: HGuvktDxsCgs 😙👉下载点此 #无畏契约 #古龙 #内核

👍3

31 Aug 2026, 09:34 UTC73 views6 reactionsread 1 September 2026
File

三角洲.小呆呆范围内核破解1.1 使用教程请看完 #三角洲 #内核

👍4😁2

30 Aug 2026, 13:02 UTC295 views3 reactionsread 1 September 2026

零龙范围/内透/单解密 13/天一卡九用(三角洲范围+单解密+内透+三服内核+单自瞄追踪+多功能一体+高能英雄全功能+无畏契约裸奔范围+和平追踪+失控进化) 下单地址 https://luoye.yjsfk.cn/shop/5YPMXC8T 反馈代理联系客服 @LLVIP_888

👍3

30 Aug 2026, 12:56 UTC147 views5 reactionsread 1 September 2026
File

零龙失控进化内核 😡发卡链接(卡密所有项目通用) https://luoye.yjsfk.cn/shop/5YPMXC8T 评论区发:零龙牛逼随机赠送20张卡密

👍5

29 Aug 2026, 16:48 UTC≈1,520 views4 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

和平精英少爷直装1.0 🌟支持观透 函数追锁 🌟boss追踪 依旧拷打 👉下载点此 #和平精英 #少爷 #直装

👍4

29 Aug 2026, 16:39 UTC245 views4 reactionsread 1 September 2026

和平精英.XL追索最新破解8.29 ⬇️下载点我 #和平精英 #内核 #辅助

👍4

29 Aug 2026, 16:33 UTC226 views8 reactionsread 1 September 2026

我虽然做了三角洲的收费内核解密单透,但是不会忘记给你们更新公益破解,你们如果有什么想玩的,在评论区发我去解密 文件/直装/内核/注入/APP都可以 ✅三角洲单内透/范围/单解密点我 ✅零龙资源高速下载链接 https://pan.xunlei.com/s/VP-o7HaH_8RcjnrB2MRHBbCZA1?pwd=387f#

👍62

29 Aug 2026, 16:31 UTC231 views3 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

✅暗区突围四服解密MIYA(国服/海外服/台湾服/越南服) 全部移到一个目录然后执行我启动(里面有视频教程) 🐔👉点我下载 #暗区突围

👍3

Showing the 12 most recent of 95 posts we hold for @xubaiwj. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@xubaiwj edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
1 September 2026
Most recent edit
1 September 2026

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 633,691 of 1,629,571 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“零龙资源分享(三角形PUBG和平无畏契约王者荣耀)” (@xubaiwj), 10,451 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xubaiwj.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.