Channel
@xuanhaimmoerchannel
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
23subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003930742737 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @xuanhaimmoerchannel |
| Created | 9 April 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 6 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/xuanhaimmoerchannel |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 1 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 07:37 | 23 | -1 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 21:45 | 24 | +1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 11:36 | 23 | +1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 12:47 | 22 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:43 | 22 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 9 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
6 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 6 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 9 April 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
What about ETH? It will represent the Altcoin market. Looking at the monthly (M) timeframe, the RSI is still below 50, not showing clear signs of an uptrend. However, Elliot Wave theory has provided sufficient momentum, and the RSI is accumulating above 45 sessions. The MACD histogram has a positive value, but essentially, the MACD is still in negative territory, so we are still waiting for it to enter the positive…
🔥1
What about the Altcoin market? Clearly, we are moving within a large triangle pattern. What does this indicate? The total market capitalization of Altcoins and BTC is becoming less volatile and shrinking, potentially stabilizing at the intersection of these two diagonals in the future, around 50-55%. Every four years, BTC.D usually experiences a sharp decline in the final year of the cycle, but this didn't happen i…
Bitcoin: MVRV Z-Score From Bitcoin Magazine Pro And the MVRV index is also like that; it hasn't reached negative values like in previous cycles, so I think BTC still has another dip to complete its 4-year cycle, which may end at the end of this year.
Bitcoin: Net Unrealized Profit/Loss (NUPL) From Bitcoin Magazine Pro And here we have a clear signal that NUPL hasn't yet reached negative levels (which usually happens during BTC's downturns). Therefore, I think BTC hasn't finished its downturn yet.
Bitcoin Price and Global M2 Supply & Growth From Coinglass First, we still need to look at global money flow with the M2 index. In most previous downturns, the M2 index tended to decrease, and the global M2 Yoy Growth was always negative when BTC was at the bottom of the cycle. Looking at this time, that's not happening. I believe this downturn won't last too long or be too extreme, as money flow remains very posi…
Hi guys, today we'll update you on what's happened. Almost 10 years ago, I analyzed that BTC had a bottom at $3000 and that growth could extend to $70,000 (you can check out my article on TradingView). Later, I worked for investment funds and I also predicted a bottom of around $15-20k and a potential growth of $140k with a 10% margin of error. My estimate was around $126-154k for last season. And yes, it reached n…
WELCOME BACK everyone, I will be updating you on the crypto market, US stocks, and gold here. We will have quality research and analysis. Welcome back.
🔥5
Channel photo updated
Channel name was changed to «XUANHAIMMOER CHANNEL»
Channel created
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @xuanhaimmoerchannel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“XUANHAIMMOER CHANNEL” (@xuanhaimmoerchannel), 23 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xuanhaimmoerchannel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.