دیگه هیچ چیزی برام جذابیت نداره، فرقی هم نمیکنه کجا باشم. انگار دیگه نمیتونم تصور کنم کسی واقعا حقیقت رو بهم بگه. کاری کردی حتی به این شک کنم که اصلا انسان واقعا روی ماه فرود اومده یا نه! - پخش شده در لایو تهکوک [ ترجمه ] ⊹ #PurpleLyrics

Channel
𝘿𝙚 𝙋𝙧𝙤𝙛𝙪𝙣𝙙𝙞𝙨
@xthewayiseeitx
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
8,607subscribers
+416 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001300611905 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @xthewayiseeitx |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/xthewayiseeitx |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 05:26 | 8,607 | +477 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 21:56 | 8,130 | -52 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 16:26 | 8,182 | +22 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:21 | 8,160 | -31 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:18 | 8,191 | first reading |
Engagement
96 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 2.26%
- avg views ÷ 8,607 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 195
- 96 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 2.80%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 96
- of 96 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 89 of 96 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 96 (5 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 18,692 |
| Reactions total | 503 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 16:41 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 11m 46s
- Average length
- 21s
Measured directly from 33 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
431 reactions across 77 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 145 | 33.6% | |
| 😭 | 127 | 29.5% | |
| ❤🔥 | 70 | 16.2% | |
| 🤣 | 34 | 7.89% | |
| 🍓 | 12 | 2.78% | |
| 🤝 | 11 | 2.55% | |
| 🔥 | 9 | 2.09% | |
| 💘 | 8 | 1.86% | |
| 💋 | 6 | 1.39% | |
| 🤗 | 6 | 1.39% | |
| 😇 | 2 | 0.464% | |
| 😍 | 1 | 0.232% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 89 of the 96 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 503reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 96 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
بذار گذشته، همون گذشته بمونه. به چیزایی فکر کنیم که قراره باعث بشن با هم بخندیم. منو همونطور که الان هستم بپذیر، نه اون آدمی که قبلا بودم. قول میدم همون کسی باشم که بتونی بهش اعتماد کنی. - پخش شده در لایو تهکوک [ ترجمه ] ⊹ #PurpleLyrics
جیمین میخواد یه کلمه انگلیسی که با بالتیمور هم قافیه باشه بگه که چیزی جز Shopping mall به ذهنش نمیرسه و تهیونگ و جونگکوک پاره میشن از خنده 😂😂🤍
😇2
یه ادلیب جدید از Into The Sun با اون وکال رانِ جونگکوک، به درخواست تهیونگی *-* تهیونگ ازش خواست بالاتر بخونه و جونگکوک هم اسلی کرد 🔥 ذوق تهیونگ 😭
آهنگ پیشنهادی کیم تهیونگ [ ترجمه ] ⊹ #PurpleLyrics
❤1
آهنگ پیشنهادی کیم تهیونگ [ ترجمه ] ⊹ #PurpleLyrics
❤🔥3
باز جیمینی دختر بچه دید دلش رفت 😭🩷
😭15
جوری که تهیونگ با دیدن مثلا تردستی جونگکوک زد زیر خنده 🥰💘
❤9🤣3
Photo, posted without a caption
❤3
ایشونم اومده با این آهنگ یه ولاگ پست کرده که ۹۹ درصدش با جونگکوک ضبط شده بعد کپشن زده "زندگی عادی" والا عشقم این چیزی که ما میبینیم "زندگی رویایی دنیاتم و دنیامی" هست-
❤13😭3
البته یاد اینم افتادم. چون دقیقا دارویی که بهش یادآوری میکردم بخوره برای گوشش بود... ولم کن تهکوک.
🐰 «ناراحتم.» 🐯 «منم ناراحتم.» 🐰 «تو چرا؟» 🐯 «چون تو مریضی و منم مریضم. ما رسما اعضای بیمارستانیم.» جونگکوک گفت پاش مشکل پیدا کرده 💔 و تهیونگ هم گفت منم گوش چپم خیلی وقته مشکل داره و کلا باهاش ۳۰ درصد میشنوم ولی دارو مصرف میکنم... یاد اون مومنت افتادم که جونگکوکی ازش میپرسید داروهات رو خوردی؟ 🥲
❤13😭2
Showing the 12 most recent of 96 posts we hold for @xthewayiseeitx. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 295,678 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 23 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@bookxteria · 4,7024 postsHollywoodiDream | هالیوودی دریم
@HollywoodiDream · 14,4684 posts°ʚ🎀ɞ°𝙚𝙩𝙚𝙧𝙣𝙖𝙡 𝙛𝙡𝙤𝙬𝙚𝙧°ʚ🎀ɞ
@eternalflowerr · 4,8532 postsKᴘᴏᴘ Sᴀᴠᴀɢᴇ آپدیت کیپاپ | BL
@kp0psavage · 5,1402 posts𝙾𝚜𝚌𝚒𝚕𝚕𝚊𝚝𝚘𝚛 𝚘𝚏 𝙻𝚒𝚏𝚎
@LifeOscillator · 1,1992 postsMusic Lyrics 🎶
@musiclyricsir · 8,4902 posts՚𝙋𝙖𝙧𝙠𝙃𝙮𝙪𝙣𝙜𝙎𝙞𝙠ᥫ᭡
@parkhyungsik_fans · 3,1312 postsbarbara palvin sprouse
@barbarapalvinDaily · 1,7021 postتهکوک|𝑇𝑎𝑒𝑘𝑜𝑜𝑘
@Fiction1taekook1forever · 1,3721 post"𝐈𝐀𝐍 𝐒𝐎𝐌𝐄𝐑𝐇𝐀𝐋𝐃𝐄𝐑"
@iansomerhalder_iran · 2,0891 post𝐐𝐔𝐄𝐑𝐄𝐍𝐂𝐈𝐀🦢༊
@kiddo8283 · 4,0711 postkorean by prmiss
@koreanbyparmiss · 2,7251 post𝑁𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑙 𝑙𝑎𝑛𝑑 | دنیای کتاب
@landofnovel · 3,3951 postLatin Celebrities
@LatinCelebrities · 2,2801 post🧚♀✨My world ✨🧚
@Meandfairyland · 4,9191 post𝐦𝐞𝐞𝐧𝐛𝐚𝐛𝐞 🩵✨💙
@MEENBABEIRAN · 9131 post𝗥𝘆𝗮𝗻 𝗚𝗼𝘀𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗴
@RyanGosling_616 · 1,5081 postShakira
@Shakirafans · 3,1251 post𝘿𝙚 𝙋𝙧𝙤𝙛𝙪𝙣𝙙𝙞𝙨
@ShinyStuff · 801 post𝑫𝒓𝒆𝒂𝒎𝒔
@spaec · 4,1351 postقَـروقاطــے 👀
@special_chums · 2,4191 post𝙏𝘼𝙆𝙃𝘼𝙔𝙊𝙇𝘼𝙏𝘼𝙈
@takhayolatm · 3,5761 post𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐎𝐑𝐈𝐆𝐈𝐍𝐀𝐋 𝐅𝐀𝐌𝐈𝐋𝐘
@The_OriginalFamily · 1,5641 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝘿𝙚 𝙋𝙧𝙤𝙛𝙪𝙣𝙙𝙞𝙨” (@xthewayiseeitx), 8,607 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xthewayiseeitx.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.