Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for XSPA Universe

Channel

XSPA Universe

@xspa_ai

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,497subscribers

-62 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002428334626
TypeChannel
Username@xspa_ai
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/xspa_ai

Growth

3,4973,5683,532.56 August 2026 — 3,559 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,559 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,558 subscribers9 August 2026 — 3,562 subscribers12 August 2026 — 3,565 subscribers16 August 2026 — 3,567 subscribers19 August 2026 — 3,568 subscribers23 August 2026 — 3,553 subscribers25 August 2026 — 3,546 subscribers28 August 2026 — 3,536 subscribers31 August 2026 — 3,530 subscribers4 September 2026 — 3,520 subscribers9 September 2026 — 3,497 subscribers6 August 20269 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 34 days, net -62. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,486–3,579 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Sept 2026, 01:553,497-23
4 Sept 2026, 02:563,520-10
31 Aug 2026, 12:343,530-6
28 Aug 2026, 20:083,536-10
25 Aug 2026, 23:533,546-7
23 Aug 2026, 01:043,553-15
19 Aug 2026, 10:583,568+1
16 Aug 2026, 07:153,567+2
12 Aug 2026, 10:263,565+3
9 Aug 2026, 08:113,562+4
6 Aug 2026, 08:303,558-1
6 Aug 2026, 04:343,559no change
6 Aug 2026, 03:503,559first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 21 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 22 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
7s
Average length
7s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

22 reactions across 10 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1150.0%
🔥836.4%
👍29.09%
👏14.55%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 24 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 12:35 UTC58 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

The Expansion Continues.. We started with Iran, then expanded towards the arabic speaking diaspora. Next we are expanding all marketing channels in North Africa and Europe! All while we continue to reach more people in the Farsi- and Arabic-speaking diaspora!

🔥21

6 Aug 2026, 06:44 UTC90 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Every tap moves money. The question is whose. Every other crypto card works the same way, the platform is the account, the card is the key to their vault. You tap, they pay the merchant, you settle later. It's their money in motion, not yours. XSPA cuts that chain. Your wallet is the account. You tap, your funds move directly to the merchant. No platform sitting in the middle holding anything. Same terminal. Same

🔥3

5 Aug 2026, 09:30 UTC97 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Welcome to XSPA. Your keys. Your crypto. Zero middlemen. XSPA is the non-custodial Crypto Wallet + Visa card built for real-world spending — fully on-chain, with on-chain & cross-chain swaps baked in. No bridges to hunt down, no wrapped-token headaches. Just move your assets and spend, anywhere. Join the chat →https://t.me/XSPAuniversechat Get the app → https://xspa.onelink.me/4mzx/uqkdcff9 Sovereign money, spend

1

5 Aug 2026, 06:13 UTC97 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

You wouldn't leave your ETH on an exchange. So why spend from one? Every crypto card except XSPA: you deposit → platform holds → card accesses their account. Your name. their money. XSPA keeps the custody model you already believe in. xspa.ai

👍1

4 Aug 2026, 11:31 UTC91 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Crypto neobank cards just hit $607M in monthly volume, up 223% year over year. Big number. Worth unpacking. Most of that volume is running through the same model that's existed since day one: you give the platform your funds, they hold them, and the card gives you access. It's spending from their account with your name on it. XSPA flips it. Your wallet holds the funds. The card just moves them when you tap. No cus

1

3 Aug 2026, 08:22 UTC77 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Cards were meant to be keys, a way to access your money, not a place for someone else to hold it. At some point that flipped. Every card product today works on the same model: they hold your funds first. You access them through the card. The card is their vault door, not yours. XSPA inverts it. Your wallet holds your funds. The card is how you spend them. Top up from your XSPA wallet, spend anywhere Visa is accepte

1🔥1

2 Aug 2026, 11:49 UTC75 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Your wallet stays yours. The card just spends it. Top up from your XSPA wallet and spend anywhere Visa is accepted, your funds never leave your wallet until you choose to use them. No lockup, no middleman, no custody handed over to anyone. That's the XSPA card. 👉 xspa.ai

1 Aug 2026, 10:19 UTC141 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Good news for the community 🎉 Virtual card issuance is now free. And next up: we're removing the 1.99% top-up fee too. We're listening, and we're building XSPA for you. Download XSPA and enjoy the benefit.

4🔥2👍1👏1

1 Aug 2026, 07:18 UTC77 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

💳 Introducing a different kind of crypto card. Most crypto cards work like this: you deposit your funds into their platform (they hold it), then you spend from their balance. That's custody — they're holding your money. XSPA works differently. Your crypto stays in your own self-custody wallet. When you want to spend, you top up the XSPA card directly from your wallet. Your private keys never leave your device. No

31 Jul 2026, 07:08 UTC109 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

⏳ The CLARITY Act has until August 10. Here's what's at stake: - Federal preemption protecting self-custodied crypto from state seizure as "abandoned property" - Statutory protection for the right to hold without a custodian - Regulatory clarity that centralized intermediaries get regulated, self-custody doesn't The bill passed the House, cleared Senate Banking Committee. But August 10 is the last window before rec

30 Jul 2026, 06:56 UTC83 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

📉 DeFi TVL is down 37% YTD. Hundreds of billions left protocols, vaults, and pools since January. What happened to people in DeFi this year: - Exploits drained pools overnight - Governance votes changed terms post-deposit - Front-ends froze, locking users out of their own funds Every single one of those risks disappears with self-custody. XSPA holds nothing. Your crypto stays in your wallet, under your keys. No pr

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @xspa_ai. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“XSPA Universe” (@xspa_ai), 3,497 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xspa_ai.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.