Channel
@xsockspro
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
794subscribers
+194 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003401825210 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @xsockspro |
| Created | 13 November 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/xsockspro |
Hacking & security — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Oct 2026, 09:18 | 794 | +43 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 02:57 | 751 | +32 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 19:21 | 719 | +16 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 19:04 | 703 | +18 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 19:49 | 685 | +48 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 07:13 | 637 | +35 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 18:37 | 602 | +2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:15 | 600 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:07 | 600 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 13 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
18 reactions across 8 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 18 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 18 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 13 November 2025 to 28 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
✅ June Update! Dear friends, we've prepared another round of improvements! • Updated the interface with a softer, more eye-friendly design. • Added multiple connection string formats for easier proxy setup. • Added AutoRenew for automatic proxy renewal. • Unfortunately, we were unable to reach mutually acceptable terms with IPQS. Available providers now: MaxMind GetIPIntel Scamalytics
❤4
✅ May Update! Dear friends, we finally added proxy reputation checks before purchase! Services available for checking: • GetIPIntel • IPQualityScore • AbuseIPDB • Scamalytics You can run a full proxy quality check in the purchase confirmation window. Cost of one check - $0.05
❤3
✅ April Update! - Added proxy search filter by OS: Windows / MacOS / Android - MacOS proxies introduced → Apple icon added to the storefront - Improved icons in purchase confirmation and connection details windows Homepage: - Structure redesigned to be more informative - Added translations: French, Russian, Hindi, German 🔜 Full store localization into these languages is coming soon Have a great day!
❤4
🔥 How Do Websites Detect Mobile IPs? Mobile proxies are highly trusted and look very “human,” but websites can still identify that an IP belongs to a mobile carrier. This is not a reason to block you — just a technical classification. Here’s how they do it: 1️⃣ Mobile carrier ASN databases Every IP belongs to a specific provider. Mobile networks have their own Autonomous System Numbers (ASNs), and websites can eas…
❤2
🔥 Why CGNAT Is a Huge Advantage for Anonymity CGNAT (Carrier-Grade NAT) is a technology used by mobile and some residential networks. Its core idea: one public IP is shared by dozens, hundreds, or even thousands of real users at the same time. This makes mobile proxies incredibly hard to track or block. 1️⃣ Thousands of users behind one IP A website cannot reliably identify who is making a request — too many real …
❤1
🔥 Why Are Mobile Proxies More Expensive? Mobile proxies are the most expensive type of IP — and it’s not marketing, it’s pure technology and economics. Here’s why: 1️⃣ Limited supply from mobile carriers Mobile IPs come directly from real 4G/5G operators. The supply is limited, but demand is huge → prices naturally rise. 2️⃣ CGNAT = extremely high trust level Thousands of real users can share the same mobile IP …
🔥 What Are Mobile Proxies and Why Are They the Most Trustworthy? Mobile proxies use IP addresses from mobile network operators (4G/5G). Since this traffic comes from real mobile carriers, it looks exactly like activity from normal smartphone users. That’s why mobile proxies are one of the most reliable and hardest-to-block proxy types. 🔹 Why are mobile proxies so popular? 1️⃣ Maximum trust level Websites rarely bl…
❤1
🔥 What Are DNS Leaks and How Do You Avoid Them? When you use a proxy or VPN, all your traffic should pass through that server. But sometimes a DNS leak occurs — your DNS requests bypass the proxy and go directly to your ISP. This can reveal your real location and IP, even if the rest of the traffic is routed through the proxy. 🔹 Why are DNS leaks dangerous? 1️⃣ Your real IP gets exposed Websites can see your origi…
🔥 Why Do Websites Block Proxies? Many platforms actively monitor traffic and block proxies — especially when they detect automated or suspicious behavior. Here are the main reasons: 1️⃣ Suspicious behavior patterns If a website sees identical actions across accounts, very fast requests, or activity without natural delays — it looks like a bot. 2️⃣ Too many requests from one IP High request volume = potential DDoS …
❤2
🔹 IPv4 vs IPv6 — What’s the Difference and Which One Should You Use? IPv4 The classic internet protocol — and still the most widely used today. Because IPv4 addresses are limited, they’re more valuable and often more trusted by websites. IPv4 highlights: ✔️ highest compatibility — works everywhere ✔️ fewer blocks on strict platforms ✔️ stable performance for scraping & automation Best for: 🌐 websites with strict f…
❤1
🔹 HTTP vs SOCKS5 — What’s the Difference and Which One Should You Choose? HTTP Proxies These work on the web protocol level. They understand and process HTTP/HTTPS traffic, can modify headers, and sometimes cache requests. Perfect for browsers and anything web-related. HTTP highlights: ✔️ optimized for website traffic ✔️ supports HTTPS ✔️ can modify/analyze headers Best for: 🌐 browsing & web scraping 🛒 marketplace…
🔹 UDP vs TCP — What’s the Difference and Which Is Better? TCP (Transmission Control Protocol) TCP is the “reliable” protocol. It establishes a connection, checks packet delivery, and ensures everything arrives in the correct order. Perfect when stability and accuracy matter. Advantages of TCP: ✔️ guaranteed delivery ✔️ correct packet order ✔️ reliable even on unstable networks Common use cases: 🌐 websites & HTTPS …
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @xsockspro. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“XSOCKS” (@xsockspro), 794 subscribers as measured 4 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xsockspro.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.