Channel
@xsfjtype
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
4,866subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001405872708 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @xsfjtype |
| Description | بعد از دادن تست MBTI، صفر تا صد خصوصیات تایپ خودت و نزدیکانت رو از همینجا بخون 🤍. تبلیغات: @TbMBTI لینک تست : @MBTItst پرسش و پاسخ : @MBTIpm چنل مختص هر تایپ: @MBTISUB 冬 𝟫𝟫.𝟢𝟧.𝟢𝟩 |
| Created | 23 July 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/xsfjtype |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 16:11 | 4,866 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:36 | 4,869 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:03 | 4,870 | first reading |
36 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 27 of 36 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 36 (2 August 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 8,550 |
| Reactions total | 63 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 05:12 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
63 reactions across 27 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ⚡ | 63 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 27 of the 36 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 63reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 36 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
• شخصیتشناسی تایپ ESFJ ایاسافجی های سالم اصلا نیاز ندارن یه ظاهر "عالی" و فداکارانه از خودشون به بقیه نشون بدن. اونها به اطرافیانشون اهمیت میدن و برای کمک بهشون تلاش میکنن ولی این باعث نمیشه از خودشون غافل بشن و مراقبت نکنن. اونها به جای اینکه تلاش کنن خودشون کارها رو به نحو احسن انجام بدن، از دیگران درخواست کمک میکنن. دوست دارن از دیگران چیزهای مختلف یاد بگیرن و با تغییر کردن مشکلی ندارن. همهی این ها باعث میشه…
⚡2
៕ #FACT ―――——— • تایپ هایی که در نوشتار بهتر از گفتار عمل میکنن : - تایپ INTP - تایپ INTJ - تایپ INFJ - تایپ INFP - تایپ ISTJ • ریلکس ترین و موفق ترین تایپ ها در پنهان کردن استرس : - تایپ ISTP - تایپ INTP - تایپ ENTP - تایپ ESTP • خسته ترین تایپ های شخصیتی : - تایپ INTP - تایپ INFP - تایپ ISFP - تایپ ENFP - تایپ ENTP • منطقی ترین تایپ های شخصیتی : - تایپ ENTP - تایپ INTP - تایپ INTJ - تایپ ENTJ - تایپ ESTJ ―――———…
⚡1
• نقطه ضعف های ESFJ ها - به تأیید دیگران احتیاج دارن. - سریع تصمیم میگیرن. - ممکنه بیش از حد احساساتی باشن. ―――———―――———―― ᚚ @MBTISUB . #ESFJ
⚡1
៕ #FUN ―――——— • تایپهای MBTI و آشپزی ـ ESTJ, INFJ, ISFJ, ENTJ : احتمالا آشپزهای خوبی هستن یا اگر امتحانش کنن از پسش برمیان. ـ ISTJ, INTJ : غذاهای ابتدایی رو بلدن درست کنن و از گرسنگی تلف نمیشن. ـ INFP, ENFP, ISFP : احتمالا فقط غذاهای نیمه آماده مثل ناگت و رامن و غیره رو امتحان میکنن. ـ ENFJ, ESFJ : آشپزی نمیکنن ولی بدشون نمیاد غذاهای ابداعی خودشون رو درست کنن. ـ ESFP, ESTP : تا به حال یه اجاق گاز از نزدیک ندید…
⚡3
• جوری که ESFJ نقشه انتقام میکشه نسبت به دشمنشون و اهانتاش دچار عقده روحی میشن. چطور تونست اینکارو باهام بکنه؟ درمورد اینکه دشمنشون چقدر مخربه شایعه پراکنی میکنن و جوش میارن و درحالیکه توی پشت صحنه سعی دارن زندگیه طرف رو خراب کنن جلوی روش مثل یه فرشته رفتار میکنن. ―――———―――———―― ᚚ @MBTISUB . #ESFJ
⚡2
• مواردی که به تایپ ESFJ ربط میدیم ∽ انجام تکالیف در راه رسیدن به مدرسه. ∽ گاز گرفتن لب ها، به جای کلمات خشمگین. ∽ آغوش های موقت. ∽ بوی وانیل. ∽ موهایی که میریزن توی صورتت، وقتی سرت رو خم میکنی که به چیزی نخوره. ―――———――――――—— ᚚ @MBTISUB . #ESFJ
⚡3
• سازگاری تایپ ENTP با ESFJ اگه ENTP با ESFJ در رابطه ای کنار هم قرار بگیرن، 30 درصد سازگاری دارن که جزو سازگاری بالا در روابط افراد با همدیگهست. در این نوع ارتباط شخصیت ENTP در ارتباط با شخصیت ESFJ به صورت انتقادی با هم برخورد می کنن. یعنی در اختلافات سعی در انتقاد طرف مقابل رو دارن. ارزشی که اون ها رو کنار هم قرار میده عقلانیته. رشد و پویایی این دو در کنار هم از طریق همکار حاصل میشه. اگه هدف مشترکی داشته باشن میت…
⚡1
• توصیف استایل ESFJ توی چند کلمه شیک و پیک، استایل خاص برای هر فصل، یونیک، سافت. ―――———―――———―― ᚚ @MBTISUB . #ESFJ
⚡4
៕ #Fact ―――—— • رتبهبندی تایپها از نظر، فراوانی بین مردم (( خانمها )) 1= ISFJ 2= ESFJ 3= ESFP 4= ISFP 5= ENFP 6= ISTJ 7= ESTJ 8= INFP 9= ENFJ 10= ESTP 11= ENTP 12= ISTP 13= INTP 14= INFJ 15= INTJ 16= ENTJ ―――———―――——————— ᚚ @MBTISUB . #AllTypes
⚡1
៕ #Fact ―――—— • رتبهبندی تایپها از نظر، فراوانی بین مردم (( آقایان )) 1= ISTJ 2= ESTJ 3= ISTP 4= ISFJ 5= ISFP 6= ESFJ 7= ESFP 8= ENFP 9= ESTP 10= INTP 11= INFP 12= ENTP 13= INTJ 14= ENTJ 15= ENFJ 16= INFJ ―――———―――——————— ᚚ @MBTISUB . #AllTypes
• شخصیتشناسیِ ESFJ ها وقتی صحبت از روابط شخصی میشه، ESFJ ها بسیار با محبت هستن و برای حفظ هماهنگی در روابط تلاش زیادی میکنن. زنان و مردان ESFJ احساساتشون رو مخفی نمیکنن، مخصوصا وقتیکه عشق به وجود میاد اونها حسشون رو به روشهای خیلی ملموس بیان می کنن. ―――———―――———―― ᚚ @MBTISUB . #ESFJ
⚡4
• بررسی ESFJ از نظر برونگرایی اون ها هم مثل ENFJ ها، برون گرا ترینِ برون گراها هستن و فقط کافیه لب تر کنن تا یه عالمه دوست و رفیق دورشون جمع بشه؛ اما با Si که دارن ، بازم ترجیح میدن تمرکزشون رو روی کسایی که بیشتر باهاشون آشنان و دوست و خانواده بذارن. ―――———―――———―― ᚚ @MBTISUB . #ESFJ
⚡6
Showing the 12 most recent of 36 posts we hold for @xsfjtype. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 893,471 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“「ISFJ . ESFJ」” (@xsfjtype), 4,866 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xsfjtype.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.