过年第一次去岳父家,拿点什么比较有排面
🥰15❤12🔥11👏9👍7

Channel
@xs5799
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,201subscribers
-13 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001699020025 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @xs5799 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/xs5799 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 15:17 | 2,201 | -12 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:30 | 2,213 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:33 | 2,214 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 26 September 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 September 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
236 reactions across 9 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🥰 | 80 | 33.9% | |
| ❤ | 71 | 30.1% | |
| 👍 | 36 | 15.3% | |
| 🔥 | 25 | 10.6% | |
| 👏 | 22 | 9.32% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 0.847% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 236reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 26 September 2024 to 29 September 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
过年第一次去岳父家,拿点什么比较有排面
🥰15❤12🔥11👏9👍7
学生嫖娼,从1800砍到600
🥰27❤15👍10👏8🔥3
“我比较传统” “我的其他前任没有这样” 恶心他妈给恶心开门,恶心到家了!
🥰25❤15🔥7👍5👏2😁2
增加品牌曝光率,吸引更多潜在客户 破局业绩增长困境,只需租用我们的广告位。 —————————————— 下方频道共计订阅人数120万+ 接置顶+置底+轮播广告
❤17🥰13🔥4👍3👏3
这个人是一个合作商,之前合作好久了,这个人好像是在rcbc,真没想到合作这么久了为了一千块钱跑了,现在行情不好渠道商真的会为了一两千块钱跑路了,这个是这个人的飞机号:@Aachazi 这个是他的u地址:TWAMEvc7boTPzzPEs2WB6XNF2ymjHq3XgH
❤3👍1
近日三只羊和辛巴吵起来了。此次争端源于双方在各自的直播间销售大闸蟹。在直播过程中,辛巴表示:“我只是卖一些大闸蟹,却遭到了全网主播的指责,说我卖的价格太低。即使你们把这些高粉丝量的主播全部联合起来,我也毫不畏惧,看看是否能让我退出网络平台。” 辛巴在直播中还爆料,三只羊一名女主播已经9个月没消息了,其实是被三只羊负责人和小杨哥一起送进去了,成了替罪羔羊。 随后,有网友扒出辛巴说的这位女主播可能是拥有500多万粉丝的沫沫,她曾是三只羊的主力,陪着三只羊起来的第一批主播。
❤3👍2
曝光这个傻逼黑平台 必赢亚洲 你真是死爹了,卧槽尼玛开不起 开你妈了个逼,玩电子你也黑,你怎么不去死,本人电子玩家,一天陆续充了1000多中途没有赢过,没提过款玩电子,运气好最后一点爆了1400多左右,余额打到1500,这个死逼客服又他妈让我打4杯水,家人们,一定远离这种台子,纯纯杀猪盘,打完了流水提款,后面又让你提供手持视频,你妈的比我是来摇电子的是来给你妈送户口本的? 第一笔充值凭证和最后一笔凭证都给了,就是黑你,最后我想说一句你麻痹的u存u取要你妈的信息。
👍3❤1
清纯中学班花被男同学强行插入,并且强制深喉
👍5❤3
曝光小鸟体育黑台,天博旗下平台,博系包网,作为一个新用户,充值了1200,提现2200,也不给原因,客服也一直说系统审核,啥平台审核一天不给出款,这个平台没有格局,无止境审核,朋友一直在玩,介绍我过来玩,从没见过如此没格局的平台,大家避雷,估计平台开始陆续黑款,在玩的也撤退别的平台吧
❤2
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @xs5799. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 917,753 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“黑料社|网曝门事件x” (@xs5799), 2,201 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xs5799.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.