Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for xor

Channel

xor

@xorespebp

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

5,702subscribers

-10 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001623581772
TypeChannel
Username@xorespebp
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/xorespebp

Growth

5,7025,7125,7077 August 2026 — 5,712 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,712 subscribers10 August 2026 — 5,705 subscribers12 August 2026 — 5,704 subscribers16 August 2026 — 5,702 subscribers7 August 202616 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 9 days, net -10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,701–5,714 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 03:335,702-2
12 Aug 2026, 23:235,704-1
10 Aug 2026, 03:215,705-7
7 Aug 2026, 09:305,712no change
7 Aug 2026, 09:205,712first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 26 October 2025the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

1,097 reactions across 10 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 78.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
86178.5%
🐳16014.6%
🍓766.93%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,097reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 26 October 2025 to 8 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
74
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 10 we hold a reading for · 50%
Most on one post
57
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @xorespebp. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 10 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 October 2025 to 8 December 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

8 Dec 2025, 04:21 UTC≈8,860 views40 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @SecLabNews

🧟React2Shell CVE-2025-55182 с оценкой 10 уже в арсенале китайских APT Критическая уязвимость в React Server Components уже ушла "в поле". Китайские группировки Earth Lamia и Jackpot Panda начали эксплуатировать баг CVE-2025-55182, получивший неофициальное имя React2Shell. Уязвимость с оценкой 10 по CVSS позволяет удаленно выполнять произвольный код без аутентификации на сервере, если проект еще не обновлен до React

🐳2614

8 Dec 2025, 04:21 UTC≈7,870 views37 reactionsread 12 August 2026

интернету пизда видимо грядет новая эпидемия, как было во времена eternal blue пока публичного рабочего poc нет, но думаю сейчас начнутся прям массовые взломы 🥹

🐳37

20 Nov 2025, 16:23 UTC≈9,120 views66 reactionsread 12 August 2026

нас опять блокают по айпи, через минут 5-10 уже будут сервера новые 🕷

57🐳5🍓4

6 Nov 2025, 04:44 UTC≈14,400 views60 reactions12 Starsread 12 August 2026

кто хотел ai ассистента без цензуры и ограничений реально часто спрашивали, это не реклама, просто делюсь digdig2nugjpszzmqe5ep2bk7lqfpdlyrkojsx2j6kzalnrqtwedr3id.onion

59🐳1

5 Nov 2025, 17:28 UTC≈10,300 views69 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026

вообще такая интересная тема, есть ряд тем о которых вроде хочется рассказать и думаю в очередной раз видос наберет миллионы просмотров, но когда сам начинаешь использовать техники и какие-то технические фишки в работе больше палить их не сильно хочется, но в тоже время понимаешь что всем будет интересно.... похоже на желание выложить фотки с какого-то крутого объекта, ценой запала актуальности залаза последнее вре

67🍓2

5 Nov 2025, 17:14 UTC≈8,350 views95 reactionsread 12 August 2026

все больше стал склоняться к тому что одновременный рост в технической сфере и постоянный постинг в медиа невозможны, как только начинаешь много постить - уходишь в это, и на техническое развитие вне контекста постов времени не остается а когда начинаешь реальные задачи решать так же начинаешь уходить в это и на посты просто не остается времени что б РЕАЛЬНО делать это все одновременно надо быть просто ебнутым

65🐳18🍓12

3 Nov 2025, 21:53 UTC≈7,970 views78 reactions2 Starsread 12 August 2026

по факту я практически в лайве это все писал, были естественно ошибки, и написана лишь маленькая часть проекта, хоть видос и на 2 часа в описании к видосу ссылка на репозиторий, там уже финальная версия на конец видоса мой код скорее всего уебщиный, конечно я не могу с пол пинка написать идеальный rest api бэк на С, но думаю что только так научусь чистый код хороший писать, а вы можете заценить видос и тоже попробо

78

3 Nov 2025, 21:40 UTC≈7,740 views61 reactions2 Starsread 12 August 2026

видос залил https://youtu.be/MC3U2ms50Lk?si=9GfCx74Ycyg8Uv8n

43🐳11🍓7

27 Oct 2025, 10:35 UTC≈9,150 views217 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

на днях решил ебануться и устроить небольшой челлендж, начал писать интернет магазин на почти чистом С (там используется лишь драйвер для pg и libuv.h) пишу в vim без подсветки синтаксиса первый видос уже отснят, там будет создание соединения и миграции бд, видео вышло достаточно долгим, естественно было ебанутое количество ошибок компиляции, и все это исправление тоже попало на видос это просто интеллектуальный ч

173🐳30🍓14

26 Oct 2025, 00:36 UTC≈8,620 views374 reactions57 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

привет всем... хотел бы начать всё заново, наверное это немного грустно, но иногда нужно не бояться проститься с прошлым, что бы идти в будущее. теперь тут будет более большой канал, про urban exploration, хакинг, безопасность и деанон, а не просто рандомные посты из моей жизни. относительно недавно я нашел своё истинное призвание. потихоньку стал заниматься расследованиями инцидентов. да, пока ни одна история о

305🍓37🐳32

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @xorespebp. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“xor” (@xorespebp), 5,702 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xorespebp.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.