4 measurements spanning 16 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 524–525 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
22 Aug 2026, 17:53
525
+1
8 Aug 2026, 01:41
524
-1
7 Aug 2026, 02:16
525
no change
7 Aug 2026, 02:07
525
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 21 November 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 February 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
372 reactions across 17 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
86
23.1%
🔥
72
19.4%
🤯
42
11.3%
😢
40
10.8%
😱
27
7.26%
👎
24
6.45%
❤
20
5.38%
😁
16
4.30%
💩
10
2.69%
🤩
9
2.42%
🤬
6
1.61%
🎉
5
1.34%
😂
5
1.34%
🫡
5
1.34%
🤔
2
0.538%
👨💻
1
0.269%
💅
1
0.269%
😭
1
0.269%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 372reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 November 2021 to 5 February 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🚀 Next.JS — фреймфорк, созданный командой React.JS для функционала, выходящий за предели SPA (Single-Page Application — одностраничные приложения), поддерживающий SSR (Server-Side Rendering — рендеринг на стороне сервера) и грамотную индексацию страниц (SEO-оптимизация).
👀 Разработчики, работающие с комбинацией Next.JS и React.JS, могут значительно упростить процесс разработки интерфейса. Next.JS поставляется с набо…
👀 Faker.js - генерация фейковых данных в браузере и Node.JS
Да-да, это та самая библиотека, которую автор удалил 4-го января в знак памяти Аарона Шварца.
😮 Огромное преимущество faker.js заключается в возможностях генерировать информацию для чего угодно: ФИО, адреса, компании, кредитные карты, названия компаний, время, даже названия животных :)
🔥 Самое интересное — генерировать эти данные можно на более 40 языках м…
😨 Что случилось с Faker.js? Темная сторона Open Source
😳 4-го января разработчик популярной NPM-библиотеки с открытым исходным кодом Faker.js внезапно удалил исходный код с GitHub и NPM.
Впоследствии GitHub заблокировал его аккаунт из-за «нарушений условий предоставления услуг».
💭 Что случилось и кто такой Аарон Шварц? Читайте в статье.
#статья
🌚 Триады в JavaScript | Рубрика "А Вы Знали?"
😮 Не только в Python, но и в JavaScript триады можно разделять при помощи символа “_”.
💭 Подобное разделение заметно улучшит читабельность кода, особенно во время записи большого числа в виде литерала.
#аВыЗнали
🎉 Поздравляю всех с наступающим новым 2022-ым годом!
💭 Желаю каждому смелых идей, новых знаний в JavaScript (и не только), ошеломляющего успеха во всём!
Чтобы не было лагов, чтобы баги всегда оборачивались фичами, чтобы заказы и проекты шли рекой и всё получалось)
💛 СПАСИБО за подписку на @xo_js, за 1000 подписчиков и за топ-1000 лучших каналов в категории “Технологии” в этом году! Мы не остановимся на этом, здесь …
⚡️ dum — утилита, созданный с целью заменить команду npm run и npx для прироста скорости.
🔥 Инструмент написан на Rust, что позволяет ему выполнять запуск Node.JS проекта как минимум в 5, а то и больше раз быстрее.
💭 Устанавливается одной командой (macOS пользователи могут также скачать утилиту через Homebrew)
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @xo_js. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 6 most recent of 7 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
💭 Так... какой результат вернет данный код?
console.info(typeof typeof 1);
"number"17%
"string"24%
"typeof 1"24%
"object"17%
"undefined"18%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 November 2021 to 5 February 2022. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“JavaScript — советы, модули, гайды” (@xo_js), 525 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xo_js.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
