Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

فرمول ماجرای بیست

@xnzkt

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

35,637subscribers

-1,859 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002026532002
TypeChannel
Username@xnzkt
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/xnzkt

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 65% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 4 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@xnzkt/125798 · this entry28 Jul 2026, 15:17 UTC@ketbex/20085428 Jul 2026, 19:22 UTC1.004.1 hours
@xnzkt/125800 · this entry28 Jul 2026, 17:17 UTC@ketbex/20085228 Jul 2026, 17:22 UTC1.005 minutes
@ketbex/20085028 Jul 2026, 15:21 UTC@xnzkt/125802 · this entry28 Jul 2026, 19:17 UTC1.003.9 hours
@xnzkt/125836 · this entry1 Aug 2026, 08:06 UTC@ketbex/2009641 Aug 2026, 12:11 UTC1.004.1 hours
@xnzkt/125910 · this entry1 Aug 2026, 10:07 UTC@ketbex/2009631 Aug 2026, 10:11 UTC1.004 minutes
@ketbex/2008911 Aug 2026, 08:10 UTC@xnzkt/125912 · this entry1 Aug 2026, 12:07 UTC1.003.9 hours
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@ketbex9 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.003.9 hoursthis entry (63)
@MaFop8 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.001.9 hoursthis entry (53)
@Fo_maj7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.002.0 hours@Fo_maj (43)
@Fojxi7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.002 minutesthis entry (52)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 12 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 12 comparable posts for this entry, running 28 July 2026 to 4 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 5, the earliest publisher we hold is @ketbex. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the keys clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 4 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

35,63737,49636,566.57 August 2026 — 37,496 subscribers8 August 2026 — 37,355 subscribers8 August 2026 — 36,989 subscribers9 August 2026 — 36,574 subscribers10 August 2026 — 36,166 subscribers11 August 2026 — 35,897 subscribers12 August 2026 — 35,637 subscribers7 August 202612 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 5 days, net -1,859. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 35,358–37,775 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 21:1635,637-260
11 Aug 2026, 20:1235,897-269
10 Aug 2026, 21:5136,166-408
9 Aug 2026, 23:3636,574-415
8 Aug 2026, 20:5636,989-366
8 Aug 2026, 00:2137,355-141
7 Aug 2026, 17:0237,496first reading

Engagement

32 posts held, back to 28 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.488%
avg views ÷ 35,637 subscribers
Avg views / post
174
32 posts measured
Reaction rate
0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
32
of 32 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 32 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held32 (28 July 202610 August 2026)
Views total5,566
Reactions total0
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 20:55 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 20:12 UTC52 viewsread 12 August 2026

🫟‌ کتاب فرمول بیست زمین شناسی گاج 📮کیفیت 4K مناسب پرینت رنگی 📮تاریخ چاپ : ۱۴۰۴ ( ویژه کنکور ۱۴۰۵ ) 📮 رشته مشترک 🏵 چاپ جدید مناسب کنکور ۱۴۰۵ و بعدتر 🦋 کتاب فرمول بیست زمین شناسی گاج https://t.me/ketbex

10 Aug 2026, 18:12 UTC42 viewsread 12 August 2026

🫟‌ کتاب فرمول بیست تاریخ معاصر یازدهم گاج 📮کیفیت 4K مناسب پرینت رنگی 📮تاریخ چاپ : ۱۴۰۴ ( ویژه کنکور ۱۴۰۵ ) 📮 رشته مشترک 🏵 چاپ جدید مناسب کنکور ۱۴۰۵ و بعدتر 🦋 کتاب فرمول بیست تاریخ معاصران یازدهم گاج https://t.me/ketbex

10 Aug 2026, 16:12 UTC33 viewsread 12 August 2026

🫟‌ کتاب فرمول بیست تاریخ یازدهم انسانی گاج 📮کیفیت 4K مناسب پرینت رنگی 📮تاریخ چاپ : ۱۴۰۴ ( ویژه کنکور ۱۴۰۵ ) 📮 رشته انسانی 🏵 چاپ جدید مناسب کنکور ۱۴۰۵ و بعدتر 🦋 کتاب فرمول بیست تاریخ انسانی یازدهم گاج https://t.me/ketbex

10 Aug 2026, 14:11 UTC30 viewsread 12 August 2026

🫟‌ کتاب فرمول بیست شیمی دهم گاج 📮کیفیت 4K مناسب پرینت رنگی 📮تاریخ چاپ : ۱۴۰۴ ( ویژه کنکور ۱۴۰۵ ) 📮 رشته تجربی و ریاضی 🏵 چاپ جدید مناسب کنکور ۱۴۰۵ و بعدتر 🦋 کتاب فرمول بیست شیمی دهم گاج https://t.me/ketbex

10 Aug 2026, 12:10 UTC34 viewsread 12 August 2026

🫟‌ کتاب فرمول بیست دین و زندگی دهم گاج 📮کیفیت 4K مناسب پرینت رنگی 📮تاریخ چاپ : ۱۴۰۴ ( ویژه کنکور ۱۴۰۵ ) 📮 رشته ریاضی و تجربی 🏵 چاپ جدید مناسب کنکور ۱۴۰۵ و بعدتر 🦋 کتاب فرمول بیست دین و زندگی دهم گاج https://t.me/ketbex

10 Aug 2026, 10:10 UTC35 viewsread 12 August 2026

🫟‌ کتاب فرمول بیست تاریخ دوازدهم انسانی گاج 📮کیفیت 4K مناسب پرینت رنگی 📮تاریخ چاپ : ۱۴۰۴ ( ویژه کنکور ۱۴۰۵ ) 📮 رشته انسانی 🏵 چاپ جدید مناسب کنکور ۱۴۰۵ و بعدتر 🦋 کتاب فرمول بیست تاریخ دوازدهم انسانی گاج https://t.me/ketbex

10 Aug 2026, 10:04 UTC50 views0 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

⭕️ خفن ترین و جامع ترین پک در چنل های درسی ❤️‍🔥 🐸 کاملترین پک همایش تلگرام تمامی منابع 🐸 کاملترین پک نهایی تلگرام تمامی منابع ـــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــ ⭕️ کامل ترین لیست دبیران دوره های ۴۰۵ و قبل تر ☑️تمامی دوره های دبیران 👇 ☑️آرشیو تمامی جزوات دبیران به تفکیک ❤️‍🔥کامل‌ ترین آرشیو ریاضی کرمی ❤️‍🔥کامل‌ ترین آرشیو ریاضی حیدری ❤️‍🔥کامل‌ ترین آرشیو شیمی فراهانی ❤️‍🔥

Showing the 12 most recent of 32 posts we hold for @xnzkt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

کتاب کمک درسی نهایی کنکوری
@ketbex · 97,022
16 posts
ßōōk | درسی
@KetebDarsibot · 42,388
16 posts
نهایی مرادی و فراهانی دهم یازدهم
@qwklf · 32,370
3 posts
نهایی زیست حنیف عظیمی
@AzimiOrg · 53,164
2 posts
نهایی فیزیک قضاتی
@fi_gho · 40,903
2 posts
نهایی زیست فرهمند‌نیا
@frzwa · 39,507
2 posts
نهایی ریاضی حیدری دهم یازدهم دوازدهم
@Hwmwr · 31,710
2 posts
نهایی فیزیک براتی
@mirwp · 33,070
2 posts
نهایی شیمی مصلایی دهم یازدهم دوازدهم
@qwjga · 31,917
2 posts
نهایی فیزیک نوکنده
@qwkhf · 32,665
2 posts
نهایی ریاضی معین کرمی
@rikarami · 43,987
2 posts
گودرت
@safehajibot · 40,557
2 posts
اخبار درسی کنکوری نهایی
@sazemane_sanjesh · 11,053
2 posts
زمین چلاجور رجایی همدانی
@wnslj · 37,889
2 posts
نهایی عربی فلاح واعظی
@ar_fav · 35,265
1 post
نهایی فیزیک شجاعی
@eonrv · 118,509
1 post
نکته تست زیست زمین همدانی
@gw_zi · 32,155
1 post
نهایی ریاضی آریان حیدری
@qwzdf · 32,028
1 post
نهایی زیست خیراندیش دهم یازدهم دوازدهم
@rbjqn · 45,228
1 post
نهایی شیمی هادیانفرد فرد
@rtvjw · 45,845
1 post
گودرت
@safegirinovbot · 74,063
1 post
اخبار رسمی سازمان سنجش
@sanjeshrasmi · 409,322
1 post
نهایی فیزیک یحیوی
@yah_vi · 34,063
1 post
نهایی فیزیک یحیوی
@yahwt · 31,979
1 post

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“فرمول ماجرای بیست” (@xnzkt), 35,637 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xnzkt.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.