6 measurements spanning 5 days, net -236. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 81,618–81,924 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 11:54
81,653
-35
11 Aug 2026, 10:53
81,688
-53
10 Aug 2026, 11:20
81,741
-79
9 Aug 2026, 10:32
81,820
-38
8 Aug 2026, 06:54
81,858
-31
7 Aug 2026, 14:02
81,889
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 5 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
120
Videos
1
Links
135
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
1,049 reactions across 20 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
369
35.2%
👍
307
29.3%
🔥
242
23.1%
👌
62
5.91%
🤯
34
3.24%
🤝
20
1.91%
😱
12
1.14%
👏
2
0.191%
🙊
1
0.095%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,049reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 December 2025 to 29 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @xnode_pro. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 December 2025 to 29 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
1️⃣2️⃣3️⃣4️⃣5️⃣
New Node Alert: Quip Network is NOW LIVE!
We are thrilled to announce that Quip has officially been added to our platform! You can now deploy and manage your Quip node with just a few clicks.
What is Quip?
Quip is a next-generation infrastructure that merges a Compute-Consensus Layer with a Post-Quantum Asset Layer. Instead of wasting energy on useless cryptographic hashes, Quip’s Quantum Proof-of-…
1️⃣2️⃣3️⃣4️⃣5️⃣
The xNode $100 Balance Giveaway - THE RESULTS ARE IN!
Our latest community giveaway has officially wrapped up! A massive thank you to everyone who jumped in, verified their Twitter and Instagram subscriptions, and supported the project. Your energy fuels us to keep building the best decentralized infrastructure out there. 🚀
Drumroll, please... 🥁 We are thrilled to announce our 10 lucky winners, who…
1️⃣2️⃣3️⃣4️⃣5️⃣
The xNode $100 Balance Giveaway is Live!
We’ve just launched our latest community giveaway - designed to get your next project off the ground and onto our high-performance infrastructure for free.
We are dropping $100 in total platform credits so you can deploy, test, and scale without spending a dime.
The Prize: 10 lucky winners will each score a $10 xNode balance. It’s everything you need to spi…
1️⃣2️⃣3️⃣4️⃣5️⃣
⚡️ The New Era of X1 EcoChain Nodes is Here!
We are evolving! We’ve listened to the community and revamped the way you participate in the X1 EcoChain to make node running more accessible, flexible, and instantly rewarding.
The game has changed. Here is why you should jump in right now:
🔹 Earn Coins, Not Points
Skip the wait and the complicated conversion rates. Starting now, your node generates na…
The OpenClaw Dashboard Guide is Live!
We’ve just released a comprehensive guide to the new OpenClaw Web Dashboard - designed to get you out of the console and into the action.
Everything you need to fine-tune your agent is now accessible directly in your browser.
What’s inside the guide
🛠 Skills (ClawHub): Transform your agent into a DevOps powerhouse. Learn how to plug in Git, Docker, and automation tools seamles…
1⃣2⃣3⃣4⃣5⃣
🏆 The xNode x EcoChain x Nomis Giveaway has Ended!
A huge thank you to everyone who participated and to our partners at X1 EcoChain and Nomis for making this happen. It’s been great to see the engagement across the ecosystem.
🎉 Congratulations to the 10 Winners:
1) 0x0eb3d962fde6e985ac6ff90d0d35722bf815e6bc
2) 0xe1ceea8efaf7fb973cb65653caa7dd3d59283f25
3) 0x2c4cae79cfb24f05efcc8d77c72a9a2e2230a3cd
4) 0x…
1️⃣2️⃣3️⃣4️⃣5️⃣
Last Call: $2,000 Giveaway Ends Tomorrow!
Don't sleep on this - the xNode x EcoChain x Nomis giveaway closes its doors tomorrow, March 5th. We’re giving away 10 X1 EcoChain Beginner licenses (Total value: ~$2,000)
The entry process is as clean as it gets:
1. Mint your score on the X1 EcoChain Testnet via Nomis
2. Visit the giveaway page
3. Connect the same wallet you used for minting
4. Confirm you…
1️⃣2️⃣3️⃣4️⃣5️⃣
Openclaw is officially LIVE on xNode!
We’ve delivered exactly what the community has been asking for: the power of Openclaw, integrated directly into the xNode ecosystem. As a platform dedicated to seamless Node-as-a-Service operations, we are breaking down the barriers between complex AI and user-friendly automation.
The Power of AI Agents - In Just 2 Clicks
Openclaw is your new personal AI powerh…
1️⃣2️⃣3️⃣4️⃣5️⃣
xNode x EcoChain x Nomis Giveaway
From February 19 to March 5, we are launching a giveaway in collaboration with our partners X1 EcoChain and Nomis.
🎁 Prizes
We will be giving away 10 X1 EcoChain Beginner licenses.
10 winners - 1 license each.
Total prize pool value: ~$2,000.
How to participate
The process is intentionally simple:
1. Mint your score on the X1 EcoChain Testnet via Nomis
2. Visit t…
1️⃣2️⃣3️⃣4️⃣5️⃣
X1 EcoChain is now available!
X1 EcoChain is a next-generation Layer-1 blockchain designed to combine true decentralization with energy efficiency. Instead of energy-intensive mining and centralized data centers, the network runs on more than 5,000 low-power physical nodes across 60+ countries, each consuming only 3 Wh. Using Proof of Authority consensus and full EVM compatibility, it delivers secur…
1️⃣2️⃣3️⃣4️⃣5️⃣
OptimAI Network is now available!
OptimAI Network is a revolutionary Layer 2 DePIN designed to redefine how AI models are trained. By decentralizing data mining, OptimAI allows anyone to contribute to the next generation of AI agents simply by using the internet.
Why OptimAI?
By running a Core Node, you power the Layer 2 DePIN backbone - directly supporting high-performance data processing and AI m…
🏆 xNode Power Contest: The Results Are In!
The battle for deposit volume has come to an end! From January 7 to January 21, our community showed incredible activity, and now it’s time to crown the winners who leveled up their node game to the max.
The rankings are based on total deposit volume during the contest period. Let’s see who took the top spots:
🥇 The Leaderboard
1st Place — 20 ARO + 20 TASHI nodes (12 mont…
👍15🔥6❤5
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @xnode_pro. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 194,623 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@xnode_pro named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@proton named in 5 posts, 8 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“xNode: Official Channel” (@xnode_pro), 81,653 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xnode_pro.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.